Schack Attack: Judge Schack Smacks Down Steven J. Baum Again!

From homeequitytheft.blogspot.com

In Brooklyn, New York, Kings County Supreme Court Justice Arthur M. Schack is at it again, denying another foreclosing lender seeking foreclosure because of screwed up paperwork. In addition, Justice Schack makes this observation regarding the attorneys of record representing the foreclosing 1st mortgagee and the 2nd mortgagee:

Finally, for reasons unknown to this court, Ms. Bechakas, the attorney of record for subordinate mortgage defendant MERS, as nominee for FIRST FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORP., failed to disclose to the Court that she is employed by plaintiff’s counsel, Steven J. Baum, P.C.

My March 17, 2010 examination of the Office of Court Administration’s Attorney Registry reveals that Ms. Bechakas, admitted in the Fourth Department in 1991, lists her business address as “Steven J. Baum, P.C., 220 Northpointe Pkwy, Ste G., Amherst, NY 14228-1894.” As noted above, Steven J. Baum, P.C. is the attorney for plaintiff LASALLE. The Court is concerned that the simultaneous representation by Steven J. Baum, P.C., of both plaintiff LASALLE and subordinate mortgage defendant MERS, as nominee for FIRST FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORP., is a conflict of interest in violation of 22 NYCRR § 1200.24, the Disciplinary Rule of the Code of Professional Responsibility, entitled “Conflict of Interest; Simultaneous Representation,” in effect when plaintff LASALLE moved in December 2008 for a judgment of foreclosure and sale.

For the ruling, and a discussion of the applicable New York law, see Lasalle Bank N.A. v Smith, 2010 NY Slip Op 50470(U) (March 22, 2010).