Kentucky Court Throws Out MERS Lawsuit

Could Be The Shape Of Things To Come With MERS Lawsuits

Colleen Sullivan, Banker & Tradesman

A federal court in Kentucky has dismissed a suit against the Mortgage Electronic Registration System (MERS) brought by that state’s county clerks.

The court dismissed the case “with prejudice” meaning it cannot be resubmitted.

“There is nothing in the plain language of the statute that indicates that the statute was designed to be enforced by the county clerk,” the court wrote, saying that the registration system was intended to make prospective purchasers aware of potential liens against property. While a failure to do so might give such a purchaser a legitimate complaint, the court ruled, the clerks were not an injured party under the law and could not bring suit.

“The harm for which the plaintiffs seek to recover is recording fee revenue from assignments of mortgages,” the court wrote in its decision. “The purpose of the statutes cited by plaintiffs is to assure that liens are discharged when an underlying loan is paid off, to give subsequent purchasers and lenders notice of recorded liens, and to allow creditors to give notice of their secured interest in the property. The General Assembly has enacted statutory provisions allowing certain governmental agencies to collect unpaid fees and charges. However, the General Assembly did not provide a statutory mechanism for the recovery of fees for unfiled assignments by county clerks. Had the General Assembly wanted to allow county clerks to file lawsuits regarding recording fees, it certainly knew how to do so.”

Read more here

Share

Have No Fear, Edward DeMarco Is Here

FHFA Conservatorship Plan Envisions New Securitization Model

Deutsche-Borse Wire

The Federal Housing Finance Agency sent a letter to Congress Tuesday that outlines its strategic goals to reduce the presence of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the mortgage market while simultaneously building a new infrastructure for the secondary mortgage market.

“With the conservatorship operating for more than three years and no near-term resolution in sight, it is time to update and extend the goals and directions of the conservatorship,” FHFA Acting Director Edward DeMarco wrote in a letter to Members of Congress Tuesday.

“FHFA is contemplating next steps to build an infrastructure for the secondary mortgage market that is consistent with existing policy proposals and will support any outcome of the leading legislative proposals,” DeMarco added.

In a document that elaborated further on the FHFA’s strategic goals, the FHFA said a new secondary mortgage market without Fannie and Freddie would have to include:

- A framework to connect capital markets investors to homeowners — specifically, a securitization platform that bundles mortgages into any of an array of securities structures and provides all the operational support to process and track the payments from borrowers through to the investors.

- A standardized pooling and servicing agreement that replaces the Enterprises’ current Servicer Participation Agreement and corrects the many shortcomings found in the pooling and servicing agreements used in the private-label MBS market before the housing bubble burst.

- Transparent servicing requirements that set forth requirements for mortgage servicers’ responsibilities to borrowers and investors across a spectrum of issues including delinquent loan servicing, solicitation for refinance or loan modifications, and servicing transfers.

- A servicing compensation structure that promotes competition for, rather than concentration of, mortgage servicing. Such a structure would take full account of mortgage servicers’ costs and requirements, and consider the appropriate interaction between origination and servicing revenue.

- Detailed, timely, and reliable loan-level data for mortgage investors at the time a security is issued and throughout the life of the security. Such transparency is a prerequisite for private capital to bear a meaningful portion of mortgage credit risk.

- A sound, efficient system for document custody and electronic registration of mortgages, notes, titles, and liens that respects local property laws but also enhances the liquidity of mortgages so that borrowers may benefit from a liquid secondary market for buying and selling mortgages. Such a system should be especially attuned to privacy and security issues while providing full transparency where required by law or in the interest of borrowers.

- An open architecture for all these elements, to facilitate entry to and exit from the marketplace and an ability to adapt to emerging technologies and legal requirements over time.

Read more here

Share

FHFA Puppetmaster Wants To Name Former BofA Insider As New Fannie Chief

Mayapoulos Was In Charge Of BofA Dept. That Committed Robo-signing

Richard Eskow, Huffington Post

The other day we appeared on Sam Seder’s program,The Majority Report, to discuss the radical-right ideology of Edward DeMarco, a Bush appointee who became Acting Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and continues in that role because Congress won’t confirm President Obama’s nominee.

As we wrote last week, DeMarco is single-handedly blocking relief for millions of struggling homeowners and is using deception to justify his actions.  He refuses to allow Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two government-sponsored enterprises he now directs, to reduce principal or even interest rates.  Some underwater homeowners are paying as much as 7 percent interest, while loans are now available at 4.3 percent.

DeMarco deceived lawmakers by suggesting it would cost $100 billion to write down mortgage principal while, as we wrote last week, his own agency’s estimates show that it would probably save more than $28 billion.

It gets worse.  Even in the days since we taped this interview the DeMarco train has continued to ride the housing market off the rails.  An academic has studied DeMarco’s insistence on increasing the Fannie/Freddie financial portfolio — which he says has no bearing on his refusal to do more to help homeowners — and has concluded that “there is a very significant conflict of interest” which DeMarco and others have understated.

DeMarco’s team has invested roughly $5 billion of Freddie Mac’s $650 billion in “reverse floaters” which are essentially bets that the homeowners who aren’t being helped by DeMarco’s team will never get helped.  That conflict of interest is actually understated, said Christopher Mayer of Columbia Business School, because these “floaters” are derivatives which link back to $26 to $30 billion in mortgages.  That makes the amount of mortgage loans subject to this conflict five to six times what was originally believed.

Read more here

 

Share

FL GOP To Bankers: What Is Thy Bidding My Master?

GOP Rams Foreclosure Streamlining Bill Through Key Senate Committee

Kimberly Miller, Palm Beach Post

A quickie foreclosure bill that would require a homeowner to present a sound defense or face an immediate judgment in some cases moved closer to a full legislative hearing Monday with the blessing of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Monday’s vote marked the farthest a proposal to streamline Florida’s strained foreclosure process has advanced in the Legislature since the housing collapse, but it’s in no way a done deal, lawmakers and lobbyists say.

The 5-2 approval of Senate Bill 1890 came with hesitation from some committee members and firm opposition from homeowners and foreclosure defense attorneys. One man, who called the sponsors of the bill a “disgrace” during public comment, brought blown-up images of his own foreclosure documents that he said show evidence of fraud.

The plan, which contains some consumer protection language, such as reducing the time a bank could pursue a homeowner for unpaid mortgage debt from five years to one year, has earned support from the Real Property Probate and Trust Law section of the Florida Bar.

But the Florida Bankers Association has yet to take a position, and it is flatly opposed by the Florida Consumer Action Network.

“We cannot support this bill because it places too much of the burden of repairing the foreclosure problem on the backs of homeowners and (community) associations,” said Alice Vickers, a network attorney.

House sponsor Rep. Kathleen Passidomo, R-Naples, and Senate sponsor Jack Latvala, R-St. Petersburg, said Monday that they will work through constituent concerns this week to get matching bills. They are seeking approval in the plan’s two remaining Senate committee stops. The House version of the bill (HB 213) has one committee stop left.

Read more here

Share