Baum’s Demise Leaves Hudson Valley Homeowners In Limbo

Cathey O’Donnell, Lohud.com

New York Foreclosures

 

New York’s largest foreclosure firm, which once handled thousands of cases in the Lower Hudson Valley, will officially close Monday, but it has left a trail of questions and frustrated property owners caught in legal limbo.

The Steven J. Baum PC law firm, based in Amherst, N.Y., originally was retained for more than 600 foreclosure cases that remain active in Westchester, Rockland and Putnam. In all, Baum’s firm has handled more than 4,000 cases in the three-county region since 1999, court records show.

But last year, the firm announced its official closing, scheduled for Feb. 20, after it came under scrutiny from state and federal agencies for “robo-signing,” or mass producing foreclosure documents without verifying whether they were accurate.

“The problems Baum’s firm left this state with are just beginning,” said Susan Chana Lask, a Manhattan attorney. “The new firms taking over his files need to take time to figure out and correct what he did.”

That means homeowners face longer delays and could owe more money in accrued interest, penalties or fines while their cases drag through an already overburdened state and federal court system.

“This is a real problem,” said Derek Tarson, an attorney with the Legal Aid Society of Rockland. “I’ve really noticed it at the foreclosure settlement conferences where I have clients who show up but there’s no representative from the bank.”

Read more here

Share

Lippman Announces Foreclosure Court In NY

Dan Wiessner, Reuters

A new court initiative will allow all New York homeowners facing foreclosure to obtain legal representation and streamline the process of settling mortgage disputes out of court, Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman said Tuesday during his annual State of the Judiciary speech.

The “unprecedented” deal between the state, legal service groups and four large banks — Wells Fargo, Citibank, Chase and Bank of America — includes the creation of a new court part that will hear only foreclosure settlement conferences, Lippman said. Each week of the month will be dedicated to a different bank, with one attorney assigned to handle all cases for that lender.

“There will be no more excuses, no more delays,” Lippman said. “Real negotiations will take place, and homeowners will leave the table with the best available offer.”

The court system, Lippman said, is seeking to avoid scenarios that can delay settlement conferences for years, including homeowners being told their paperwork is out-of-date and lawyers for banks claiming to have incomplete sets of documents.

The program will kick off in New York City, where non-profit legal service groups have agreed to represent all homeowners entering the settlement conference process. The new part will not launch for “at least a couple of months,” said Paul Lewis, who helps coordinate courts’ handling of foreclosure proceedings for the Office of Court Administration.

Last year, New York became the first state to require attorneys for lenders to verify the accuracy of all mortgage documents. The rule led to an immediate dip in the number of foreclosures filed in the state, but court officials recently warned of a continuing crisis that is depriving homeowners of their legal rights and overburdening the court system. More than 345,000 mortgages were delinquent or in default in New York in 2011, according to a report released last month by the Neighborhood Economic Development Advocacy Project.

The chief judge’s announcement came less than one week after federal officials unveiled a 49-state, $25 billion settlement with five large banks. The settlement promises to pay $2,000 to any homeowner who has been illegally foreclosed upon, and some of the money will be used to fund legal service programs to allow homeowners to secure modifications on their mortgages.

Read more here

Share

Foreclosure Fraud Queen Linda Orlans Stakes Claim In NY

Forms New Law Firm With Former Baum Minions

Jonathan Epstein, Buffalo News

Two former attorneys from Steven J. Baum PC have formed their own Law firm in Amherst to focus on mortgage foreclosures, bankruptcies and other real estate legal matters.

Adam Gross and Amy Polowy joined with Michigan-based attorney Linda Orlans to form Gross, Polowy & Orlans LLC.

The start-up firm has already opened an office in Amherst and employs 18 attorneys and 47 support staff, having hired most from the Baum firm.

Gross Polowy has already assumed a small portion of the 50,000 cases that Baum had leftover when it announced its closure. And it plans to open another office on Long Island, mirroring the geographic footprint of the now-disgraced Baum firm.

The Amherst-based Baum firm was the state’s leading foreclosure law firm, handling more than 40 percent of cases across the state. But the firm, which had been criticized for shoddy work, lost its contracts with mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac after Halloween office party photos surfaced that mocked foreclosure victims.

The firm and an associated document processing firm, which had employed more than 700, including nearly 100 attorneys, announced in could close in late February.

The new firm — known as GPO—said it is working to first stress home retention as a means of distinguishing itself from firms around the state that operate on what Gross called a “race to foreclosure” model.

“We’re not calling ourselves a foreclosure firm. We’re calling ourselves a home retention firm,” said Gross, 46, a downstate attorney who has handled foreclosures since 1998.

“When you look at the array of options available to a servicer, one of them is foreclosure, but the best option is for the borrower to be able to retain home ownership and continue to make payments that are affordable.”

That doesn’t mean it won’t initiate foreclosure proceedings on behalf of its lender clients, he said. For one thing, many servicing guidelines require the foreclosure to be filed even when the borrower and lender are still negotiating a loan modification or other alternative.

Even the state’s new mandatory settlement conferences—a new requirement imposed by state lawmakers before a foreclosure can be completed — do not take effect until after the first foreclosure papers have been filed.

“A home retention, if the borrower can qualify, is the best option,” Gross said. “Anybody representing servicers should take the same approach.”

Read more here

Share

MERS Tells Schneiderman His Lawsuit Is Garbage

Steve Dibert, MFI-Miami

Below is a press release issued by MERS in response to the lawsuit filed by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman last week naming MERS as a co-defendant for defrauding the people of the state of New York.  Naturally, like every other press release MERS publishes you have to take it with a grain of salt because their press releases tend to be as accurate and unbiased as Leni Riefenstahl’s pro-Nazi “documentary”, Triumph of the Will from 1934.

Setting the Record Straight

Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) takes its role as a mortgagee very seriously. The MERS® System is an important part of the mortgage industry and the MERS business model has been consistently validated in all 50 states. All of the activities of MERSCORP and MERS are in compliance with state and federal laws. We are confident that as people understand more about MERS and the role we play, they will see that MERS adds great value to our nation’s system of housing finance in ways that benefit not just financial institutions, the broader economy and the government, but—most of all—homeowners.

AG Schneiderman Claim #1: Defendants have improperly brought New York foreclosure proceedings in MERS’ Name

FACT: The right to bring a foreclosure action is determined by the Plaintiff’s relationship to the mortgage loan, which is whether the entity bringing the action is the holder of the note or authorized by the holder of the note to bring a foreclosure action. MERS was authorized by the note holder to bring foreclosure actions in its name, and the borrower agreed that MERS may be the entity who may foreclose on the property in the event of a default. That being said, since July 2011 MERS no longer acts as foreclosing entity. In addition, MERSCORP never received a fee or made any money on foreclosures initiated in MERS’ name.

AG Schneiderman Claim #2: MERS Certifying Officers, including defendant servicers’ employees and agents, have submitted false, deceptive and often legally invalid documents in New York foreclosure proceedings

FACT: When MERS is the mortgagee and is not the entity foreclosing, MERS executes an assignment of a mortgage that transfers all of the interests in the mortgage to the entity that is foreclosing prior to the commencement of the foreclosure. The courts have held that MERS may assign its interests, as a mortgagee, and that such assignments are valid.

AG Schneiderman Claim #3: The use of MERS certifying officers by defendants has confused and deceived homeowners and the courts.

FACT: It is perfectly proper for MERS, as the mortgagee, in order to fulfill certain acts required of the mortgagee, to appoint signing officers (or agents) to act on MERS’ behalf. To act as a principal for its signing officers is not a deceptive trade practice. There is no requirement under New York law that a principal must disclose whether its agents are employed by another entity. These agents authorized to act on behalf of MERS are not employees of MERS, but employees of the loan servicers or sub-servicing companies. Signing officers are duly authorized to perform their responsibilities on behalf of MERS who is the mortgagee – in compliance with applicable laws – and to sign their own names and to use the titles “vice president” and “assistant secretary” of MERS.

AG Schneiderman Claim #4: MERS and defendant servicers through their use of MERS have concealed important information from homeowners about their property and the role that MERS plays with respect to their mortgage.

FACT: MERS does not hide ownership or undermine the integrity of land records. Any mortgage holder registered in the MERS® System can easily access information related to their mortgage on our website or through a toll-free number. Federal law provides that consumers are notified for changes in investors or servicing status. In addition, county land records were not intended to identify the servicer of a mortgage or the current note holder; they are intended to provide notice to purchasers of property that there is a lien on the property and when that lien was perfected.

Share