Pennsylvania Activists Want Foreclosures Stopped

Claim Paperwork Problems Are Robbing people Of Due Process

Timothy McNulty, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Pennsylvania foreclosuresHousing activists are calling on Pennsylvania banks and sheriffs to temporarily halt all home foreclosures, saying a paperwork error could save thousands of people their homes.

The state Superior Court on Jan. 30 ruled in favor of three women facing foreclosure who claimed they were not notified, as required by law, that they could have a face-to-face meeting with their mortgage holders to try to resolve outstanding payments.

The Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency issued more than 100,000 such “Act 91″ forms from 1999 through 2008 that did not contain that notification, their lawyer Michael Malakoff said.

That means they, too, could get relief from courts. Another of his pro-bono clients, Kathy Todd of Lincoln Place, was due to go through a sheriff’s sale two weeks from now before it was halted due to the decision.

“It’s a huge relief for me to know I’m not going to lose my house,” she said at a Downtown news conference called by Action United, a nonprofit advocating for low-income residents.

The community group is trying to publicize the decision by a three-member Superior Court panel so that others going through the foreclosure process are made aware of the matter, as well as lenders and sheriffs around the state.

Pending the appeal of the decision to the full Superior Court — which was filed Feb. 13 by lenders Beneficial, HSBC and J.P. Morgan Chase — the housing group says officials should put a halt on all foreclosure actions.

“Since the Superior Court has now ruled that this Act 91 letter is wrong … the foreclosures that have happened in the past are a problem and for sure no more foreclosures should go forward if that deficient letter is in people’s files,” said Maryellen Deckard, Action United’s lead Western Pennsylvania organizer.

“I think it would be a win-win for the city, the sheriff’s office and the homeowners — as well as the banks — to stop the process until the law becomes settled,” Mr. Malakoff said.

In a separate interview, Allegheny County Sheriff William Mullen said his office has been following the legal wrangling but has no plans to halt foreclosure actions until court rulings are final.

If the courts continue to rule the Act 91 letters were deficient “there will be a lot of cleanup work to do. There are a lot of things to look at before we make the final call,” he said.

The sheriff launched a mortgage conciliation initiative

Read more here

Share

PA County Sues US Bank Over MERS Recordings

usbank,pa countiesJoe Napsha, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review

Pennsylvania’s 67 counties may have lost $100 million in fees because of a system that assigns mortgages without recording documents in county courthouses, according to a lawsuit filed by Washington County.

The county sued U.S. Bank Corp. of Minneapolis in Washington County Court, claiming the bank failed to pay a $52 recording fee when it acquired residential properties bundled in investment securities and sold them through the Mortgage Electronic Registration System Inc. of Reston, Va., known as MERS.

MERS is a national database of mortgages created by the banking industry to automate recordings and aid creation of mortgage-backed securities. Some experts consider that process to be a contributing cause to the mortgage and credit crisis that plunged the country into a recession in 2008. The electronic system tracks more than 65 million mortgages.

In the lawsuit, Washington County estimated it lost $1.6 million in recording fees over seven years from U.S. Bank’s failure to record mortgages it acquired. Based on the estimated losses, about 30,470 mortgages were not recorded in the county.

Washington County Recorder of Deeds Deborah Bardella said that estimate may be low because the county does not know how many times the mortgages were assigned to different investors.

The lawsuit, filed Sept. 28, not only wants restitution from U.S. Bank but asks the court to require the bank to record prior mortgage assignments on all properties on which it foreclosed. The county also is seeking class-action status that would cover the lost recording fees in the state’s 67 counties.

U.S. Bank spokeswoman Nicole Garrison-Sprenger said, “We think this suit is without merit.”

It’s the first lawsuit filed in the state against a bank over the issue of failing to record mortgages bundled into mortgage-backed securities that were sold and assigned to other financial institutions through MERS, said Evie Rafalko McNulty, president of the Pennsylvania Recorder of Deeds Association and the recorder in Lackawanna County. She estimated that Lackawanna County, where Scranton is the county seat, lost $1.3 million in recording fees.

Read more here

Share

PA man files suit over securitized home foreclosure

Rich Lord, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

The millions of mortgages that were bundled into giant investment pools and traded like stocks shouldn’t be subject to foreclosure, according to an unusual lawsuit filed Wednesday.

That’s because when banks chose to turn mortgages into investment products, they gave up the right to take the house, attorney Luke Lucas argues.

His lawsuit in U.S. District Court focuses on one Plum man’s mortgage. But if its theory were accepted by courts, it would have huge implications for the entire mortgage market.

Mr. Lucas sued on behalf of Jayson Schott, 34, who in 2004 got a $97,500 adjustable rate mortgage from America’s Wholesale Lender. The rate went up, and he went into default.

Bank of America, which bought America’s Wholesale Lender, filed for foreclosure in 2008. But according to the complaint, the loan had long since ceased to be a mortgage.

That’s because shortly after its inception, it was “securitized” — combined with thousands of other loans into an investment vehicle called a Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit, or REMIC. That was done, according to the complaint, in order to make it a tax-exempt product that investors from all over the world could buy into — like a stock.

That longstanding process became more prevalent last decade.

Read more here

Share

Facing legal issues, Goldbeck McCafferty becomes KML

 

Jeff Blumenthal, Philadelphia Business Journal

Goldbeck McCafferty & McKeever , the Philadelphia law firm that represents lenders in residential foreclosure disputes, has changed its name to KML Law Group in a major restructuring effort. The change reflects the departure of firm president Gary McCafferty and an interest in rebranding in the wake of a lawsuit filed against the firm late last year.

The firm was sued last November in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court for allegedly using paralegals instead of lawyers to sign legal papers related to foreclosures and accused of the unauthorized practice of law.

Read more here

 

Share