Trump Beautifully Outmaneuvers BofA To Help Socialite

Robert Frank, Wall Street Journal

In the history of rapid wealth loss, Patricia Kluge stands apart. Once married to one of America’s richest men, she won a divorce settlement in 1990 worth more than $100 million and proceeded to spend it on her lifestyle and business ventures. She was forced to sell off her Cartier diamonds, Givenchy gowns and silk drapes before declaring personal bankruptcy in June.

Yet the Fall of the House of Kluge has been a windfall for one man: Donald Trump.

As Ms. Kluge’s empire collapsed, Mr. Trump bought. Over the past six months, he swooped in and picked up many of the pieces of her palatial Virginia estate and winery. He bought the 1,000-acre vineyard and winery for a fraction of their original value. He bought 200 acres nearby for less than $500,000, with help from Ms. Kluge and her son.

Now, the pompadoured billionaire and reality-TV star may have outplayed a much bigger rival in a bid for Ms. Kluge’s crown jewel: her mansion. Bank of America owns the house after foreclosing and is trying to sell it for $16 million. The 24,000-square-foot neo-Georgian palace has 45 rooms, a spa, home theater, 3,500-bottle wine cellar and 2,000-square-foot sitting room.

One thing the house doesn’t have, however, is a front yard. Mr. Trump owns that, having purchased it with his 200 acres. He also owns most of the driveway and the backyard, making a sale to any other buyer difficult. Mr. Trump said he would buy it from Bank of America for $3.6 million.

To make his point, he has erected signs on the front lawn of the mansion that read, “No Trespassing. This Land is Owned by Trump Virginia Acquisitions LLC,” aimed at warding off possible buyers. He has also let the lawn go to seed.

“Maybe someone is stupid enough to buy the house,” Mr. Trump said. “I wish them luck.”

The broker for the house, Joseph Marchetti III, responded: “We believe the house is a salable asset as it is.”

The mansion spat is just the latest drama to emerge from the outsize life of Patricia Kluge. Ms. Kluge, who was born in Baghdad and once posed nude for a London magazine, married John Kluge in 1981. Mr. Kluge, 34 years her senior, was named the second-richest man in America in 1986 by Forbes magazine after making billions from his Metromedia broadcasting empire. Ms. Kluge became a prominent socialite in New York, Palm Beach and Virginia.

Read more here

Share

Freddie Mac Fires Shapiro & Burson

Lorraine Mirabella and Jamie Smith Hopkins, The Baltimore Sun

Freddie Mac has instructed its mortgage servicers to stop referring foreclosure cases to Shapiro & Burson, the Virginia law firm accused of improper handling of more than 1,000 deeds forMaryland homes in foreclosure, the mortgage giant said this week.

Prosecutors in Prince George’s County began investigating the firm in March after a paralegal formerly employed there filed a complaint alleging that deeds and foreclosure paperwork contained fraudulent signatures.

Freddie Mac, one of the two huge mortgage companies that buys loans and mortgage securities, removed Shapiro & Burson from its Maryland designated-counsel list during an update this week. The law firm’s Virginia Beach location is still listed on Freddie Mac’s Virginia list, but the firm was suspended from taking on any new Virginia foreclosure cases after March 23, a Freddie Mac spokesman said.

The spokesman, Brad German, called the decision “mutual” and said he could not comment on whether the continuing investigation by the Prince George’s County state’s attorney’s office played a role. But Jose Portillo, the former Shapiro & Burson paralegal who complained to Maryland officials, said Freddie Mac contacted him in March to hear his allegations.

Read more here

Share

Man Saves Friend’s House Who Was Scammed By Miami Lawyer

Laura Bassett, Huffington Post

Lee Castillo, 34, is an IT systems engineer with zero experience in the mortgage industry.  But when he found out that his friend had been scammed by a loan modification company and was a week away from losing his home, Castillo decided to get involved.

“He had been trying to work with CitiMortgage and OneWest bank to get a loan modification, and they made it extremely difficult for him, especially since English was not his first language,” Castillo told HuffPost. “He came to me and said he needed to find a place to rent because the bank kept saying they didn’t receive all the documents they needed and that they were gonna foreclose. So I said, let me look into this for you and see what’s going on.”

Castillo’s friend in need, Julio Salazar, says he started losing income from his Falls Church, Va., hair-cutting business last March due to the recession.  When he could no longer afford his $1,700 monthly mortgage payments, he sought the help of Friendly Financial Services, a loan modification “specialist” in Miami.

The company referred Salazar’s case to a mortgage lawyer named Robert Rosenwasser, who charged Salazar $2,300 up front and then failed to send in all the applicable financial materials to OneWest bank.

Homeowners are never supposed to pay upfront for loan modifications. Charging money upfront is illegal in Florida, and a federal ban on collecting upfront fees took effect Jan. 31. Frank Dorman, a spokesman for the Federal Trade Commission, told HuffPost that loan modification scams have increased with the recession to take advantage of increased foreclosure.

“We advise people to avoid any company or individual that requires a fee in advance, guarantees to stop a foreclosure or modify a loan, or advises the homeowner to stop paying the mortgage company,” he said. “Many of the complaints received by the FTC include not being able to contact the company after paying for mortgage refinance services, not being able to get their money back, and not receiving proper help from the company after paying for services.”

Salazar received no help after paying Rosenwasser the $2,300 fee.

“I got a foreclosure letter after three months,” Salazar, 40, told HuffPost. “They took my money and did nothing.”

Read more here

Rosenwasse­r represente­d one of MFI-Miami’s clients as well. As far as we can tell, he charged my client $6000 and did nothing. When IndyMac began giving my assistant the run around, she contacted Rosenwasse­r for assistance and about coordinati­ng our efforts since he is a licensed attorney, Mr. Rosenwasse­r began screaming and berating her with a lot of colorful variations of the f-bomb­.   Usually when an attorney or a mod company owner does this, it means they’re up to no good.  If this article is accurate, now I know why Rosenwasser acted the way he did.

My client and myself then never heard from Mr. Rosenwasse­r again after that phone conversation. That is until my client called him asking for an update 6 months later and Mr. Rosenwwass­er demanded more money. -Steve

Share

Lawmakers consider slowing Virginia foreclosure process

David S. Hilzenrath, Washington Post

As Virginia’s new legislative session gets underway, lawmakers are considering an overhaul of the state’s foreclosure process aimed at combating alleged shortcuts and abuses by lenders seizing borrowers’ homes.

Homeowners, who currently face one of the fastest foreclosure processes in the country, would be given more time to defend themselves under one proposal. Another bill would require lenders to get the approval of a judgebefore seizing a home. A third would give homeownersa last-minute chance to avert foreclosure by catching up on overdue payments.

The effort to transform Virginia’s foreclosure process faces an early test Monday, when one of the more far-reaching bills is scheduled for a hearing and a vote in a House subcommittee. The measure would force banks to maintain up-to-date records on Virginia loans in government offices, potentially restraining global trade in these mortgages.

The proposals come as high unemployment and the real estate meltdown have made foreclosures commonplace. Overwhelmed by defaults, some lenders have been accused of using bogus or “robo-signed” documents to seize property from delinquent borrowers.

The Virginia Bankers Association strongly opposes the overhaul, saying it would gum up the process. Members of the group visited the General Assembly this week to make their arguments.

Some key lawmakers, including the speaker of the House, say the system works well and that proposed revisions could make matters worse.

Bills filed in the House and Senate call for a variety of changes.

Homeowners would be given greater warning – 30 or 45 days – before their houses could be auctioned. Current law requires that foreclosure notices be sent at least 14 days in advance, which has left some homeowners with too little time to mount a defense.

Under the new proposals, lenders would face penalties for foreclosing on the basis of false documents, and would have to seek court review before foreclosing.

Read more here

Share