Pssst…Hey Mac, you want some back alley legal advice?

How Real Estate Agents Love Playing Amateur Lawyer

Steve Dibert, MFI-Miami

 “Short sales are not sales for midgets.  There are no midgets dancing and singing, “We represent the lollipop bank, the lollipop bank, the lollipop bank”  and then handing you an agreement.  Short sales and modifications are not the yellow brick road to get you out of your mortgage obligation.” Dominick Sammarone

Anyone who has ever attempted to deal with Real Estate Agents or Brokers on a professional basis knows that most of them are bored housewives or retirees who think they are attorneys or finance experts because they took an 80 hour course on how to perform real estate transactions.  Mr. Rourke may have anointed them an attorney on Fantasy Island but here in the real world, the advice they give can have devastating results.

I hear horror story after horror story from homeowners who tell me about how real estate agents are advising them on loan modifications and short sales.   Homeowners tell me continually that realtors advise them not to make their mortgage payments.  They tell me that the agents seem to believe the propaganda from the bank when they say, “We can’t help you if your not 90 days behind.” Because of their own ignorance of the process, they are more than happy to convey this to the homeowner.

Anyone with any experience in foreclosure defense know this is bullshit. Unfortunately, it appears someone forgot to tell the Real Estate Brokers.   My experience with most Real Estate Brokers is that they feel because they took an 80 hour course on real estate transactions that they know more than a lawyer or someone who actually has a track record of keeping people in their home.

I have Real Estate Agents and homeowners who call me 9-12 months after they begin a modification or short sale negotiation.  They call me out of  desperation because they’ve hit the proverbial brick wall with the lender and now the lender is either foreclosing or has foreclosed.   The homeowner is now weeks or days away from being evicted from their home all because the realtor had no idea what they were doing.   I then have to play Winston Wolf from Pulp Fiction to save the homeowner from being tossed on the street and the realtor from getting in trouble with either state regulators or the Federal Trade Commission.

Most realtors don’t comprehend the gravity of the situation they have created for themselves or the homeowner.   When I explain to them what needs to be done the conversation tends be like the conversation that Winston Wolf has with Vincent and Jules in Pulp Fiction.  I have to explain to them that what they are doing is unlicensed practice of law.  Sometimes I have to be curt because not only are they giving unlicensed legal advice, they are also violating the Mortgage Assistance Relief Services Rule (MARS) issued by the Federal Trade Commission and various state laws.   Some Real Estate Brokers think that because they are soliciting business in other states, they won’t get caught or they are exempt from the laws of the state they are located in.   This is not true.  They are still under the jurisdiction of that state, the state the homeowner is located in and the Federal Trade Commission.

I advise them on how to protect themselves and give them advise on how to correct the situation.   They usually respond with a screaming tirade or don’t seem to care.   Usually when I receive the screaming tirade, it’s a clear indication they know they are breaking the law but are doing it anyway.   I then have to say, “Well, do you want me to save your ass, or not?  If not, good luck to you!”

But what really scares me are the responses like one I received from a Real Estate Broker in Traverse City, Michigan who said, “Well, it hasn’t been a problem, yet.  So I’m not worried about it.” This guy new he was ripping people off and didn’t seem to care.

Dominick Sammarone, a New York Real Estate Agent with onlinerealty.us, a website owned by attorneys says homeowners need to remember, “Short sales are not sales for midgets.  There are no midgets dancing and singing, “We represent the lollipop bank, the lollipop bank, the lollipop bank”  and then handing you an agreement.  Short sales and modifications are not the yellow brick road to get you out of your mortgage obligation.”

Sammarone  says, “I am seeing a flood of legal advice and continuous posts on the Internet by Real Estate Brokers and agents, advising consumers what to do if they are behind in their payments. This is illegal because it’s considered practicing law without a licence. I cannot believe the “broad brush statements” being made that are confusing consumers more everyday.”

Dominick Sammarone wrote an excellent list on the Ryan & Schwarz website of the bullshit he hears Real Estate Agents tell people on sites like Zillow, Trulia, and their own blogs:

1. Do a short sale instead of a foreclosure – (without looking into their other debt. For example, credit cards and second mortgage leins)

2. Stop making mortgage payments so you can qualify for a HAFA short sale.

3. You can live in your home for 2 years or more!

4. Don’t hire and pay an attorney to do a short sale. Your mortgage will be a thing of the past when it’s all over.

5. The lender will not seek a deficiency judgment because they are just happy to get “some” of the money back they lent to you.

6. The Lender has to accept a short sale offer.

7. You will recieve CASH after the closing.

8. Your home does not have to be owner occupied to qualify for a HAFA short sale.

9. You’re not responsible for the Brokers sales commission, the bank pays it! (I’d love to see that put in writing)

10. Sure, its ok to strip the house before you go.

I thought Real Estate Agents were not supposed to give legal advice? It’s getting very scary out there for us all due to the fact that agents are giving advice out of their expertise!  There are approximately 7 steps to consider before pursuing a short sale. A short sale is the very last step after all else fails. But if you are a Realtor who makes their living selling homes, it’s sold and packaged as the “First Step.”

One thing is for sure, Real Estate professionals are leaving the door wide open for more lawsuits by giving advice to consumers that would be better dealt with by a legal professional!

I had a client in Florida sue the real estate broker who was helping him with his modification because she told him not to make his mortgage payment and the house went into foreclosure.   It was later revealed she collected an upfront fee of $3500 from him and was not a licensed mortgage broker which required under Florida law.  His attorney and I were able to save the house and the attorney was later able to negotiate a permanent loan modification for homeowner.

The sad truth is that since the financial crisis began in 2007, everyone who lifted a pen to sign a mortgage or a sales contract thinks they’re an expert.  Most of these people lack any type of real experience.  Real Estate Brokers are no different than the attorneys, mortgage brokers or title people who jumped on the wave of modifications and short sales without knowing the fundamentals of how lending or how mortgage backed securities actually work in the U.S.


Share

Wisconsin Appeals court clarifies redemption rights with 2 mortgages

A foreclosing party can cut short a mortgagor’s right to redeem property from 12 months to six if the foreclosing party waives a right to seek a deficiency judgment. When two mortgages exist, foreclosing on one and seeking money damages on the other won’t impact the foreclosing party’s rights to a six-month redemption period.

Joe Forward, State Bar of Wisconsin

A foreclosing party who waives the right to a deficiency judgment on one mortgage does not lose the right to a shortened redemption period by later seeking a money judgment for defaulting on a second mortgage against the same property, a Wisconsin appeals court recently held.

Under 846.101, a foreclosing party may waive a judgment for deficiency amounts due after sale of the mortgaged premises. If the plaintiff so elects, no judgment for deficiency may be ordered and the debtor’s statutory right to redeem the property is reduced from 12 months to six months. In other words, a lender trades deficiency rights for a shortened redemption period.

Harbor Credit Union (Harbor) held two mortgages on the same property owned by Christopher Samp (Samp). The first mortgage secured a loan of approximately $275,000. The second mortgage on the same property secured a loan of about $125,000.

In March 2009, Harbor filed a complaint for foreclosure under the first mortgage, and elected to shorten Samp’s redemption period from 12 months to six months under 846.101 by waiving the right to a deficiency judgment under section 846.04(1).

In June 2009, the Door County Circuit Court issued an order and judgment that Samp defaulted on the first mortgage and ordered the property sold within six months. The court also ordered that, pursuant to section 846.101(2), no deficiency judgment could be entered even if the proceeds were insufficient to pay the amount due on the first mortgage.

The circuit court’s order stated that Harbor’s $125,000 second mortgage interest was junior and subordinate to Harbor’s first mortgage, but said nothing more about it.

In December 2009, Harbor obtained separate action seeking a money judgment on the second defaulted mortgage for nearly $121,000.

Two weeks later, and just over six months after the circuit court issued the foreclosure judgment, Harbor submitted the only bid on the foreclosed property for $411,000, and moved for judicial confirmation of the sale.

Harbor’s attorney asserted there was no deficiency on the foreclosure of the first mortgage and the money judgment on the second mortgage “would also be satisfied from the proceeds of the sale.” The circuit court confirmed the sale, although Samp indicated his wish to redeem the property that same day by paying the sale amount.

Read more here

Share

Wells Fargo Foreclosures Proceed After Data Queried

Dakin Campbell and David Mildenberg, Bloomberg

Wells Fargo & Co. is standing by the accuracy of its foreclosure filings and won’t follow competitors in delaying seizures, after an employee testified he signed documents for proceedings without personally reviewing records.

The bank said yesterday it doesn’t plan to halt repossessions because its “procedures and daily auditing demonstrate that our foreclosure affidavits are accurate.”

In a May 20 deposition, a Wells Fargo Home Mortgage employee said he signed 50 to 150 documents a day, including statements describing debts and borrowers used to justify foreclosures, without personally confirming the information was correct. His testimony related to a civil claim against the bank in a Washington state court. A judge dismissed the case in June.

Mortgage firms have drawn fire from borrowers, lawyers and state officials for letting employees sign affidavits for court- monitored foreclosures without personally checking loan records. JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corp. last week delayed foreclosures to review the accuracy of their filings. Last month, Ally Financial Inc. said its GMAC Mortgage unit would halt evictions for a similar review.

The Wells Fargo employee said he relied on foreclosure lawyers and personnel in other departments to check files, according to a deposition transcript provided by Melissa Huelsman, the Seattle attorney representing the homeowner. The employee said he confirmed the date on the file before signing without verifying other information.

‘Out of Context’

Those comments “should not be taken out of context,” Wells Fargo said in yesterday’s statement, e-mailed by a spokeswoman, Vickee Adams. The judge “reviewed Wells Fargo’s procedures, documents and declarations and summarily dismissed the borrower’s case, confirming that the foreclosure was valid,” the bank said in the statement.

Read more here: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-10-06/wells-fargo-won-t-delay-foreclosures-as-rivals-review-filings.html

Share

Foreclose first, ask questions later

Ann Woolner, Bloomberg via The Miami Herald

There was a time, not long ago, when having a home of your own signaled stability. It was a stake in a community, a place for individuals to come into their own or for families to grow. It was a solemn obligation to a financial institution, a statement of the bank’s faith in you, an investment for old age.

So much for that. These days, millions of houses across the country sit empty or shelter owners who can’t or won’t make mortgage payments. The vacancies undermine the notion of home ownership as a road to stability.

As dismal as the housing market is, at least we could cling to the idea that the nation was slowly climbing out of the mortgage mess. Despite how painful and heartbreaking foreclosures and evictions are, the country was working its way toward still-distant normalcy.

DASHED HOPES

This month, hopes for a stabilized housing market took a hit, as Ally Financial Inc.’s GMAC Mortgage unit halted evictions in 23 states. Attorney generals in two more states also are demanding moratoria.

The culprit is sloppy, possibly fraudulent, paperwork by at least one manager at the division. And it looks like he was doing what lots of other foreclosure processors were doing, too.

We’ve seen this culprit before. Sloppy research and sometimes fraudulent paperwork by lenders, loan packagers, credit raters and insurers of mortgage-backed securities kicked off the mortgage disaster in the first place.

The only difference is that this time it’s occurring at the rear end of the business, foreclosures.

Did anybody working at mortgage lenders learn anything over the past two years? And shouldn’t banks be careful about taking away someone’s home?

GMAC middle manager Jeffrey Stephan said in a deposition that he signed 10,000 foreclosure packages a month. To accomplish that, he had to give up something. What he omitted was checking to see whether the named owner was really in default and whether the listed mortgage holder in fact still held the mortgage.

In other words, he had no time to check the facts contained in the papers whose accuracy he was guaranteeing. Nor did he bother to always have a notary present when he signed, as required.

Likewise, a JPMorgan Chase executive said in a deposition last May that she hadn’t personally verified information on the thousands of affidavits and other documents she signed so that her bank could foreclose on houses.

OVERWHELMED

Beth Ann Cottrell, an operation supervisor at the company’s Chase Home Finance unit, testified that she and seven other managers signed a total of about 18,000 documents a month, according to a transcript.

Between the two of them, JPMorgan and Ally service a huge chunk of the country’s home mortgages, $1.35 trillion for JPMorgan and more than $349 billion for Ally, according to newsletter Inside Mortgage Finance.

Read more: http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/10/03/1854196/foreclose-first-ask-questions.html#ixzz11L4nLPbT

Share