BoA’s Balboa Insurance Hid Files For IndyMac and Aurora

Wikileaks releases the detailed Bank of America information about how they track their mortgages through Balboa, a company they acquired during the acquisition of Countrywide and how the 50 state Attorneys Generals aren’t digging deep enough.  I wrote about something similar a year ago but this goes into much deeper detail and is worth the read.  It was given to Wikileaks by a BofA insider at Balboa.  Hats off to the crew at Wikileaks!

How Balboa Hid Documents for IndyMac and Aurora

Written by ExBofAEmployee1, Wikileaks/BankofAmericaSuck

Attorneys and Attorney Generals nationwide have been working diligently against the banks in order to keep their clients in their homes. You must keep in mind that there are several levels of indiscriminate behavior going on, keeping these efforts at bay. For now, however, I will give you a general overview of how some of the tracking systems interact and how the reporting works, so that those with the power to subpoena documents for their clients know where to find the correct documentation to support their individual cases, because as Abigail Fields points out, “It would certainly be provable/disprovable by subpoenaing documents.”

In order to do that, however, an attorney would need to know where to look. If you were to only subpoena generic loan information, you will only be provided with the System of Record (SOR) data, which previous posts have clearly proved do not show the full picture as there are several common ways of removing information from the system of record both individually and en masse. As the email trail clearly shows, there is always an audit trail in the back end if you know what to ask for.

Some of the more common scenarios are:

They foreclosed on my property without proper documentation

This is a difficult one to prove, but it can be done with proper timing. As mentioned in previous posts, there are multiple departments under the document tracking umbrella, but as a prosecuting attorney against Bank of America, the easiest place to start looking is in the Balboa mail room.

Mailed documentation is important, because if you time it right, this is going to be your first point of reference when locating your “lost” deed of trust, promissory note, mortgage, etc.

The first documentation you, as an attorney, will want to subpoena is the servicing contract between the insurance tracker (Balboa, Assurant, etc) and the loan servicer (GMAC, Aurora Loan Services, OneWest, GMAC, Wells Fargo, BAC, etc). These can be obtained by an Operations Account Manager for that specific account (the department is managed by Jeremy Dahl, who once again reports to Rhonda Meyers). For each loan servicer, Balboa maintains at least 1 OAM who works at the mortgage lender’s office and 1 OAM who works at a Balboa office in order to maintain constant communication. In addition, every week, these OAM’s hold 1 internal call amongst department managers to discuss outstanding issues and 1 external call which includes management from the loan servicer. After each call, documentation and meeting minutes are distributed to all members of Balboa management so that they are all made fully aware of what was discussed and the progress of any dealings. These meeting minutes are then stored in yet another share drive.

Each contract contains quite a bit of information, but you want to look specifically for the information regarding the Service Level Agreement (SLA), Return to Lender (RTL), and Unable to Locate (UTL) documents. What you are looking for specifically is: a) How long the insurance tracker is required to keep a non-insurance related document, and b) How the insurance tracker is required to process a non-insurance related document.

Why is this important?

One loophole often exploited by the mortgage servicer to “lose” documentation is hidden in this system. There are 2 ways to prove this:

1-Mass Scale

When IndyMac and Aurora were taken over by the Feds/filed bankrupcty, what they did to exploit this loophole was simply box up all of the files they didn’t want anybody to see and sent them to Balboa. Balboa took care of them, because: a) The document remained in possession of the insurance tracker for 90 days according to the SLA cited in the contract, and b) Any documents that had the lienholder’s (or an acceptable subsidiary’s) name on it was returned to them after the 90 day period according to the RTL guidelines in the contract, while any documentation where the lienholder information was missing (scratched out, torn off, etc) was shredded per the UTL guidelines in the contract.

In order to prove this scenario, you will also need to subpoena and review (in addition to the lender contract) the full range of volume tracking documents for the date ranges the Feds would’ve been checking records (these are stored on shared tracking drives located in Simi Valley, CA, Plano, TX, and Chandler, AZ), as well as a few weeks before and after. The volumes are recorded at each step of the mailroom process via MS Excel spreadsheets and MS Access databases (review Microsoft’s EULA for information on how to obtain this information). The volumes are tracked throughout several internal share drives, SQL databases, Sharepoint sites, and even on paper documents stored in filing cabinets by Rhonda Meyers and several other AVP’s throughout Balboa. If you were to subpoena and review these specific documents (whether obtained through BAC, Balboa, or Microsoft) for the date ranges surrounding any date federal regulators were physically auditing Aurora Loan Services and IndyMac Bank, you will notice the following irregularity:

On a high volume tracking level, you will see an influx of physical documents received by the Balboa mailroom within 3-5 business days of any timeframe in which the Feds were investigating actual documents at Aurora & IndyMac. You will also notice that the influx of incoming physical documents during your target date range inconsistently affects the relative amount of RTL & UTL documents when compared to the ratios outside the target range or when compared to EDI (Electronic Document Images) or Faxed documents, as all of these incoming document sources are tracked separately for purposes of the contractual SLA.

If you wanted to further prove the point, you can also subpoena the signed delivery records kept by both FedEx/DHL/US Postal Service and the Balboa mailroom (again, run by Rhonda Meyers and tracked via MS Excel spreadsheet in various share drives) in order to see where these large volumes came from. You can find the information in the loan servicers’ expense reports as well, because large boxes haphazardly filled with documents are surprisingly heavy and cost quite a bit to ship. Accounting records for Aurora, IndyMac, and Balboa will show this scenario happened and it is indeed traceable.

Read more here

Share

Foreclosures go wrong as lenders, cleanup crews cut legal corners

L.L. Brasier and John Wisely, Detroit Free Press

Some Michigan residents have returned home to find their windows broken, houses ransacked and valuables missing.

Not from burglars, but overzealous mortgage lenders and their trash-out teams: unlicensed crews hired to clean out and secure property during foreclosures. Lawsuits filed across Michigan and the nation paint an ugly picture of impersonal foreclosures bent on speed that cut legal corners without concern for homeowners who have paid up.

“Once the foreclosure train leaves the station, it’s very difficult to stop,” said Carlin Phillips, a Boston lawyer who represents a west Michigan family that paid cash for a house. A trash-out crew mistakenly entered the property three times to shut off utilities and remove personal property, he said.

Lawyers in other suits contend that some lenders, their lawyers and property management firms are granting salvage rights to trash-out crews, who then take TVs, furniture and other personal property.

Not from burglars, but overzealous mortgage lenders and their trash-out teams: unlicensed crews hired to clean out and secure property during foreclosures. Lawsuits filed across Michigan and the nation paint an ugly picture of impersonal foreclosures bent on speed that cut legal corners without concern for homeowners who have paid up.

“Once the foreclosure train leaves the station, it’s very difficult to stop,” said Carlin Phillips, a Boston lawyer who represents a west Michigan family that paid cash for a house. A trash-out crew mistakenly entered the property three times to shut off utilities and remove personal property, he said.

“It’s like the Wild West out there,” said attorney William Yochim, representing a Royal Oak homeowner whose residence was trashed out even after he paid it off.

Even after making good on mortgage, owners vulnerable

Martin Powelson owned several rental homes and flip houses during the boom times.

When money got tight and the property started to slip into foreclosure in 2008, Powelson turned to his mother, who helped him redeem the house by paying off the delinquent mortgage with cash.

A few weeks later, he returned to find the front window broken, the locks changed, his new Jacuzzi removed, several thousand dollars worth of power tools missing and his new $6,000 sleigh bed — still in its box — gone. All told, Powelson said he lost more than $60,000 in personal items.

Wrongful trash-out

His home had been trashed out — wrongly, it turns out — by an unlicensed crew sent there by his lender, who had been told by the law firm that handled the pre-foreclosure paperwork that the house had not been redeemed and had been foreclosed upon.

It had not.

Today, Powelson is suing Trott & Trott, a Farmington Hills law firm that is the third-largest debt collection firm in the country; his former lender, Colorado-based Aurora Loan Services, and several small companies involved in the actual trash-out of the Sheridan house.

“I’ve never gotten an apology,” Powelson told the Free Press during an interview outside his now mostly empty house. Nor was any of his property returned — except for some small tools and miscellaneous items. The now-bankrupt trash-out company has admitted in court records that it kept, sold and disposed of his belongings. Powelson’s suit seeks at least $180,000 in damages and reimbursement. A trial date has not been set.

Trott & Trott declined to answer questions about this case submitted by the Free Press, stating in an e-mail that the firm did not comment about ongoing litigation. But Trott attorney Charles Hahn, who has called the suit “frivolous,” admitted in court May 19 that the firm had misinformed the lender about Powelson’s status.

Read more here: http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100607/NEWS05/6070369/1318/Foreclosures-go-wrong-as-legal-corners-are-cut&template=fullarticle

Share

Aurora High Risk Specialist Fired After Cooperating With An FBI Investigation

Denver Business Journal – by Greg Avery

A former employee of Aurora Loan Services LLC alleges in a lawsuit filed Monday that the company fired him in retaliation for helping federal investigators who were looking into one of its loans.

Michael Walker filed the lawsuit in Denver District Court against the Littleton-based company, a Lehman Brothers subsidiary that wrote billions of dollars’ worth of mortgage loans later bundled into mortgage-backed securities sold by the investment house.

A request for comment has been left with Aurora Loan Services’ attorney.

Walker’s suit says he was a former “high-risk specialist” in quality control at Aurora Loan Services LLC, a job that involved reviewing loans for signs of fraud and misrepresentation.

In early 2006, Walker filed a “suspicious activity report” with the FBI noting suspicions he had about documentation for a loan being processed for a multiple-unit residential property. Such reports are a routine obligation of financial institutions, the suit says. (Read more)

Share