Fed Shoulders AIG Loan Losses of $450Million to Ease Sale to MetLife

By Hugh Son

March 11 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve Bank of New York and American International Group Inc. agreed to shoulder as much as $450 million in losses tied to the insurer’s Japan real estate bets as part of the sale of a division to MetLife Inc.

MetLife won an accord to split most declines on $1 billion in commercial mortgages included in the $15.5 billion purchase of the AIG unit, according to a MetLife regulatory filing and the company’s chief financial officer. A corporate vehicle owned by the Fed and New York-based AIG will use MetLife stock gained in the sale to pay for future real estate losses, reducing the assets left to repay taxpayers, said two people with knowledge of the arrangement.

AIG’s Japan mortgage holdings were deemed a “more troubled asset” by MetLife, which is also indemnified from losses on one of the U.K. businesses it will acquire in the purchase of American Life Insurance Co. AIG said March 8 it is divesting Alico, which operates in more than 50 countries including Japan, to pay down bailout debts on a $60 billion Fed credit line.

“You have to ask yourself, ‘does the American taxpayer have any hope of getting their money back any other way besides selling this business?’” said William Cohan, a former JPMorgan Chase & Co. banker and author of “House of Cards,” about the financial crisis. An agreement for one side to retain some risk is typical in deals “when the buyer and seller have a difference of opinion about an asset,” he said.

Read more here:  http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-11/fed-shoulders-aig-loan-losses-to-ease-sale-of-unit-to-metlife.html

Share

Are TARP Funds Being Used To Fund Cheap Overseas Call Centers?

From Banking Horror Stories

Yesterday afternoon a client of mine and I had to call JP Morgan Chase about the whereabouts of his file MFI-Miami requested 2 months ago. After being told quite adamantly that my client would have to pay $10 per document we were requesting (that’s a subject for another article I’m working on) and after I threatened this customer service agent with everything short of telling him he was one phone call away from getting a human booster shot from a guy named Jamie, we realized we were calling a call center in the Philippines and the guy was unaware of who Jamie was.

As soon as I got back to the office to brief my assistant about the client’s file and she hands me the phone to help her talk to a customer service person at Citimortgage.  After talking to this heavily accented woman for about 10 minutes, I asked her where she was located and she tells me the Philippines.  I talked to other members of my staff and they tell me they get the same thing except Wells Fargo and American Home Servicing routes the calls to India.  American Home Servicing Agents in India get angry pretty fast when you demand to speak to someone at an American call center in Texas or California.  I had one guy lose it and scream at me in Bengali or Hindi, I couldn’t tell which.  The women in my office say the only major bank that doesn’t route their calls to Asia is Bank of America.

The experiences my office has had with dealing with these call-centers mirrors the complaints that I have heard from my clients on a daily basis for the past 18 months.  Complaints that have become more and more frequent since congress passed TARP in September of 2008.

So at the risk of sounding like I come from the nether regions of Glennbeckistan, I have to ask, are TARP funds that were given to these banks by you and I, the American taxpayer, being used to employ cheap labor in developing nations and are these call-centers using child labor? Why aren’t Americans being employed to fill these positions?

I contacted both Citigroup and J.P. Morgan – Chase’s press office and surprisingly enough my calls did not get forwarded to the Philippines.  I had to leave messages and have not heard back.  I would say the chances of me getting a return phone call are about as likely as a customer service manager calling me back from a mortgage servicer.

I find it odd that no one in Washington has asked these questions especially someone like John Dingell or Tom Harkin.  You would think members of congress especially pro-union members would be fighting and clamoring to get these call-centers in their districts in this economy just for bragging rights. Is it just another sign that congress is out of touch with what is going on outside the beltway?

<a href=”http://www.blogcatalog.com/directory/business/finance/” title=”Finance Blogs – BlogCatalog Blog Directory”><img src=”http://www.blogcatalog.com/images/buttons/blogcatalog5.gif” alt=”Finance Blogs – BlogCatalog Blog Directory” style=”border: 0;” /></a>

Share

Wells Fargo Chief Makes $21.3 Million

DOUGLAS MCINTYRE, Daily Finance

Wells Fargo (WFC) CEO John Stumpf made $21.3 million last year, up from a mere $8.8 million in 2008, according to the preliminary proxy the bank filed with the SEC on March 3rd. The four executives under him, including the CFO, the head of wealth management, the chief of wholesale banking, and the head of consumer finance, made an average of $13 million. Stumpf’s cash compensation was over $5 million and he also received nearly $45,000 in perquisites which included use of a company car.

Welcome to the world after TARP repayment, and less than two years after the credit crisis nearly brought the U.S. banking system to it knees.

The Wells Fargo board may argue that its CEO posted strong enough results for the firm’s stock to be up 250% during the last year, but that’s no better the the improvement in Citigroup’s (C) shares, and well below the run-up in the shares of Bank of America (BAC). Advocates of Stumpf’s pay package might argue that he deserves his compensation simply because Wells Fargo is still around and several other large banks and investment banks are not.

The Administration and Congress are still considering significant restrictions on bank activity in the future, including the Volcker rule, which would sharply restrict proprietary trading. There is no guarantee that if bank executives had taken more modest pay politicians would not be as aggressive in “punishing” financial firms with greater oversight, but paying a bank CEO $21 million certainly does not help.

Read more here: http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/company-news/wells-fargo-chief-makes-21-3-million/19382717/

Share

Obama Doesn’t ‘Begrudge’ Bonuses for Blankfein, Dimon

Julianna Goldman and Ian Katz, Bloomberg

President Barack Obama said he doesn’t “begrudge” the $17 million bonus awarded to JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon or the $9 million issued to Goldman Sachs Group Inc. CEO Lloyd Blankfein, noting that some athletes take home more pay.

The president, speaking in an interview, said in response to a question that while $17 million is “an extraordinary amount of money” for Main Street, “there are some baseball players who are making more than that and don’t get to the World Series either, so I’m shocked by that as well.”

“I know both those guys; they are very savvy businessmen,” Obama said in the interview yesterday in the Oval Office with Bloomberg BusinessWeek, which will appear on newsstands Friday. “I, like most of the American people, don’t begrudge people success or wealth. That is part of the free- market system.”

Obama sought to combat perceptions that his administration is anti-business and trumpeted the influence corporate leaders have had on his economic policies. He plans to reiterate that message when he speaks to the Business Roundtable, which represents the heads of many of the biggest U.S. companies, on Feb. 24 in Washington.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aKGZkktzkAlA&pos=1

Share