BofA Impeding Criminal Mod Investigation By Buying Off Homeowners

AZ AG Says Bank of America Settlements Impede Fraud Probe

Karen Gullo, Bloomberg

Bank of America Corp. is impeding an investigation of its loan modification practices by negotiating settlements with borrowers who must agree to keep them secret and not criticize the bank in exchange for cash payments and loan relief, Arizona officials say.

The Arizona Attorney General’s office is asking a court to block those aspects of the settlements and require the bank to turn over all the agreements. The bank denies any wrongdoing.

One 2011 accord involving a borrower facing foreclosure who defaulted on a $253,142 mortgage included a $5,000 payment, plus $7,500 for legal fees, and the defaulted payments were waived and the loan was modified to a 40-year term with a 2 percent interest rate, court documents show. The terms of the original loan and the borrower’s complaint about the lender weren’t described in the documents.

The borrower “will remove and delete any online statements regarding this dispute, including, without limitation, postings on Facebook, Twitter and similar websites,” and not make any statements “that defame, disparage or in any way criticize” the bank’s reputation, practices or conduct, according to documents filed in state court in Phoenix. The borrower’s name and address were redacted.

Non-Disparagement

Bank of America attorneys argue that borrowers don’t have to sign the agreements to get a loan modification and deny that settlements hinder the state’s probe. Borrowers can be subpoenaed to disclose the accords, and the Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank won’t enforce the non-disparagement provision if they talk to investigators, the bank’s lawyers have said in court filings.

Read more here

Share

Citibank CEO Has A Moment Of Zen

Vikram Pandit Says Big Banks ‘Should Start Serving’ Customers

Catherine New, Huffington Post

Citigroup CEOBig banks are realizing they may actually have to pay attention to customers to keep them.

An unprecedented number of people dumped billion-dollar institutions for smaller banks in 2011, a new report from Javelin Strategy and Research shows. The big switch came as anti-bank rage swelled, driven by the Occupy movement, Bank Transfer Day — and the $5 monthly debit card fee that Bank of America abandoned last fall after a storm of outrage.

“Banks have to start serving clients and really serve them, rather than serving themselves,” Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit said in a Bloomberg interview in Davos, Switzerland, on Thursday.

Of the 5.6 million people who switched banking institutions from September to December, 11 percent said they cut ties with their big bank because they “wanted to move to a credit union or community bank” and were fed up with fees, according to a survey analysis by Javelin, a financial research firm. In previous quarters, the number of adults who expressed that sentiment was so small the research company couldn’t make a reliable comparison.

The final data from 2011 showed that more people stayed put than moved. But of those who moved, “it was a surge” from big institutions to smaller ones, said Jim Van Dyke, founder of Javelin.

Big banks are now trying to win back good will — and customer revenue.

For Chase, that means focusing on higher net-worth clients, a spokesman told The Huffington Post. Bank of America executives explained in the latest earnings call with analysts that it is closing branches to focus on mobile phone and tablet services.

Read more here

 

Share

Groups Call For U.S. To Kill The Beast! Kill The Beast! Kill The Beast!

Public Citizens And Other Groups Call For U.S. To Break Up Bank Of America

Rick Rothacker, Reuters

Bust Up BofAA group of consumer advocates, academics and economists want to end “too-big-to-fail” banks, starting with Bank of America Corp.

The group, led by onsumer advocacy organization Public Citizen, plans to file a petition with the Federal Reserve Board and other regulators on Wednesday asking them to carve the bank into simpler, safer pieces.

The Fed and the coalition of regulators known as the Financial Stability Oversight Council have the authority to take such action under the Dodd-Frank financial reform law passed in 2010, the group said.

Nearly two dozen professors and groups have joined the effort.

It’s not clear how much effect the petition will have, and some community groups have declined to sign on.

However, the petition is a dramatic criticism of regulators who have so far done little to shrink giant banks after the 2007-2009 financial crisis.

“Bank of America currently poses a grave threat to U.S. financial stability by any reasonable definition of that phrase,” the 24-page petition said.

It said Bank of America, the nation’s second-largest bank, is too large and complex, and that its financial condition could deteriorate rapidly at any moment, potentially causing the market to lose confidence in the bank.
“An ensuing run on the bank could cause a devastating financial crisis,” the petition said.

David Arkush, director of Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division, said a lot of the group’s concerns apply to other large banks, but that Bank of America is the institution most exposed to the housing crisis.

“Regulators need to get ahead of this and act proactively to reform Bank of America,” Arkush said.

Bank of America has had a tough time emerging from the financial crisis, particularly because of mortgage losses tied to its 2008 Countrywide Financial purchase.

The bank’s stock slid 58 percent last year as investors expressed disappointment with the speed of a turnaround and fear about the bank’s ability to comply with new capital rules.

Read more here

Share

Federal Court Says David J. Stern Can Pursue $11M From BofA

Bank of America May Owe Lawyers $11 Million

By Marimer Mato, Courthouse News
BofA owes Stern $11millionA Plantation, Fla., law firm can seek $11 million in unpaid legal fees for its work on Bank of America foreclosure cases, a federal judge ruled.
The Law Offices of David J. Stern says it was the legal counsel for Bank of America’s Florida residential foreclosure cases across the state, employing some 1,200 attorneys and support staff at its peak.
 Plantation, Fla., is one hour north of Miami in Broward County.
Stern’s 11-count complaint claims that Bank of America and its corporate parent owe more than $1.9 million, while BAC Home Loans Servicing owes more than $8.7 million.
The BAC tally reflects that work that Stern allegedly performed for Countrywide Home Loans, which Bank of America bought in 2008 and merged with its loan-servicing operation.
Stern says it entered into a written contract with Countrywide in 2003 and entered into two oral contracts with Bank of America for legal services.
Exhibits to the complaint include the written contract and hundreds of pages of billing totals.
 Bank of America moved to dismiss 10 of Stern’s 11 claims, claiming that the breach-of-contract claim against BAC is the only viable allegation because it relies on a written contract.
It also says Florida’s Statute of Frauds bars enforcement of oral contracts because the firm cites at least two years of work, yet never memorialized the oral contract with a written document.
 U.S. District Judge Federico Moreno disagreed since the statute bars indefinite oral contracts that necessarily require more than one year of work. ”Nothing in Plaintiff’s allegations indicates that the parties’ understanding was that the contract would extend beyond a year,” Moreno wrote. “The court does not find the Statute of Frauds bars plaintiff’s claim for breach of oral contract because the plaintiff alleges that it fully performed under the oral contract.”
 Moreno also disagreed that the open-account claims should be thrown out as duplicative of the breach-of-contract claims. “The Plaintiff met the requirements of both the Florida forms and the federal forms to state a claim for open account,” the nine-page decision states.
As to the account-stated claims, Bank of America said it never agreed to pay the amount due.
Share