Volcker: Regulators Can’t Be Trusted To Act

Shahien Nasiripour, Huffington Post

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul A. Volcker criticized bank regulators Wednesday, saying Congress needs to specifically act to rein in Wall Street and the nation’s megabanks because the regulators won’t do it on their own.

Testifying before the House Financial Services Committee, the chairman of President Barack Obama’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board was asked to comment on the need for legislation banning banks from trading securities with their own funds and from owning or investing in hedge funds and private equity firms. Volcker has repeatedly called for such a ban, even saying that banks with Wall Street trading and Main Street lending operations need to choose between the two.

“In my opinion, it’s very unlikely that the regulators and supervisors would evoke a strict prohibition until a crisis came and then it’s too late,” Volcker said. “That’s why you want it in legislation.”

Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd released the latest version of his financial reform bill on Monday. The legislation leaves it up to bank regulators to enact such a ban, and only after the Government Accountability Office conducts a “study.” The Obama administration has pushed for an outright ban.

For regulators, “there’s a lot of pressure not to do it,” Volcker told reporters during a break in the hearing. That’s why it needs to be in the legislation, specifically directing regulators to take action, he said.

In a mocking tone, Volcker said the banks would tell regulators, “‘Don’t touch us’…’What did we do wrong?’… You know, ‘Leave us alone.’”

Dodd’s bill, to the disappointment of reformers and consumer groups, leaves a lot of discretion in regulatory matters to bank regulators like the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Treasury Department.

Read more here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/17/volcker-regulators-cant-b_n_503304.html

Share

Senate financial bill appears likely to keep Fed as regulator of big banks

Brady Dennis, Washington Post

Key members of the Senate banking committee are coalescing around legislation that would strip the Federal Reserve of much of its regulatory authority but would leave the central bank with oversight of the nation’s largest banks, according to aides familiar with the ongoing negotiations.

Under the plan, the Fed would continue to supervise only 23 bank-holding companies with assets exceeding $100 billion. Supervision of the nearly 5,000 banks below that threshold would fall largely to a proposed new regulator to be created by merging the Office of Thrift Supervision and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, aides said.

In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. would take over regulation of more than 800 state-chartered banks that currently are part of the Federal Reserve System, according to the aides, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the talks are still ongoing and the provisions still could change.

Banking committee Chairman Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.) and freshman Republican Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) have been negotiating for weeks the particulars of a sweeping overhaul of the nation’s financial regulatory system and hope to have a draft within the next week.

Dodd’s initial draft of the bill last fall stripped the Fed entirely of its regulatory authority, leaving the central bank with the sole purpose of overseeing the nation’s monetary policy. The Fed’s prospects for retaining any oversight duties seemed uncertain at best, as committee members on both sides of the aisle heaped criticism on the agency for its failures in the lead-up to the financial crisis.

Read more here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/09/AR2010030903584.html

Share

Lobbyists Win: Consumer Bill Gives Exemption on Payday Loans

Sewell Chan, NY Times

Senator Bob Corker, the Tennessee Republican who is playing a crucial role in bipartisan negotiations over financial regulation, pressed to remove a provision from draft legislation that would have empowered federal authorities to crack down on payday lenders, people involved in the talks said. The industry is politically influential in his home state and a significant contributor to his campaigns, records show.

The Senate Banking Committee’s chairman, Christopher J. Dodd, Democrat of Connecticut, proposed legislation in November that would give a new consumer protection agency the power to write and enforce rules governing payday lenders, debt collectors and other financial companies that are not part of banks.

Late last month, Mr. Corker pressed Mr. Dodd to scale back substantially the power that the consumer protection agency would have over such companies, according to three people involved in the talks.

Mr. Dodd went along, these people said, in an effort to reach a bipartisan deal with Mr. Corker after talks had broken down between Democrats and the committee’s top Republican, Senator Richard C. Shelby of Alabama. The individuals, both Democrats and Republicans, spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the negotiations.

Under the proposal agreed to by Mr. Dodd and Mr. Corker, the new consumer agency could write rules for nonbank financial companies like payday lenders. It could enforce such rules against nonbank mortgage companies, mainly loan originators or servicers, but it would have to petition a body of regulators for authority over payday lenders and other nonbank financial companies.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/10/business/10regulate.html?hp

Share

Fight For The CFPA Is ‘A Dispute Between Families And Banks,’ Says Elizabeth Warren

Shahien Nasiripour, Huffington Post

While members of the Senate Banking Committee debate proposals to fix the nation’s broken financial system and ineffective approach to protecting consumers, Elizabeth Warren has one message: Pass a strong bill or nothing at all.

“My first choice is a strong consumer agency,” the Harvard Law professor and federal bailout watchdog said in an interview with the Huffington Post. “My second choice is no agency at all and plenty of blood and teeth left on the floor.”

There’s been a steady leak of Senate proposals to fix the dysfunctional way federal regulators protect consumers from abusive lenders. One was an independent unit housed within the Treasury Department; another was a new entity, housed in the Federal Reserve, with little independence or power.

The Senate shouldn’t waste its time, asserts Warren, explaining that current proposals fail to address some of her key priorities such as arming the proposed agency with independent rule-making authority, without interference by bank regulators.

Read more here:  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/03/fight-for-the-cfpa-is-a-d_n_483707.html

Share