Fannie Mae Refused To Spank Countrywide’s Fannie for Bad Debt

Jody Shenn, Bloomberg

Fannie Mae refused to seek large amounts of mortgage repurchases from Countrywide Financial Corp. as housing began to crash, according to the former head of its regulator.

James Lockhart, who led the Federal Housing Finance Agency until 2009 and its predecessor, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, “spent a lot of time” pushing Fannie Mae executives to seek more so-called putbacks on Countrywide loans that failed to match their promised quality, he said today.

“They didn’t want to offend their largest customer,” Lockhart, now the vice chairman at investment firm WL Ross & Co., said during a speech at a Mortgage Bankers Association conference in New York.

Trends in mortgage-repurchase demands are among “procyclical” issues in the market, or items that can lead to looser credit during a boom and tighten standards during tougher times, Lockhart said. Policy makers should strive to lessen the dynamic as they remake the housing-finance system, he said.

“If people had known how bad the repurchases were going to get, we’d certainly have had a lot more disciplined underwriting,” Lockhart said in an interview. His discussions with Fannie Mae (FNMA) officials about Countrywide loans took place in 2006 or 2007, he said.

Fannie Mae and competitor Freddie Mac, the mortgage-finance companies, are being sustained on injections of taxpayer capital after being seized in 2008. Countrywide, once the largest U.S. home lender, was bought by Bank of America Corp. that year.

Read more here

Share

Occupy Detroit Stages “Foreclosure Monoply” Protest At BofA Branch

Occupy Detroit staged a pretty creative protest at a Bank of America branch in downtown Detroit modeled after the board game, “Monopoly”.  They even had a guy dressed up like Rich Uncle Moneybags.

Share

Swiss Missed: UBS loses bid to dismiss FHFA mortgage debt case

Jonathan Stempel, Reuters

A U.S. judge has rejected UBS AG’s (UBSN.VX) bid to dismiss a federal regulator’s lawsuit accusing it of misleading Fannie Mae (FNMA.OB) and Freddie Mac (FMCC.OB) into buying billions of dollars of risky mortgage debt.

U.S. District Judge Denise Cote in Manhattan said on Friday that the Federal Housing Finance Agency may pursue claims that UBS violated federal securities laws by misleading Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into buying $6.4 billion of subprime and other residential mortgage-backed securities.

The case is one of 17 that the FHFA filed last year against banks over losses suffered by the housing finance giants on approximately $200 billion of mortgage debt. Cote’s decision is the first to consider a defendant bank’s motion to dismiss, and the judge’s reasoning may also be applied in the other cases.

“The court is essentially saying that banks do not get to plead ignorance when they had an obligation to provide information to investors,” said Kathleen Engel, a professor at Suffolk University Law School in Boston and co-author of “The Subprime Virus.”

“It will give the FHFA a lot of confidence to pursue its cases, and make the banks very skittish.”

Read more here

Share

FHFA Puppet Master Caught Lying To Congress About Write Downs

Fannie Mae backed principal reductions, internal documents show

Jim Puzzanghera, LA Times

Fannie Mae officials supported principal reductions for some struggling homeowners in 2009 and believed they would save taxpayer money, but a pilot program set to start a year later was abruptly canceled apparently for ideological reasons, according to internal documents obtained by two House Democrats.

The documents contradict congressional testimony in November by Edward DeMarco, the regulator for Fannie Mae, who has opposed principal reductions, said Reps. Elijah Cummings of Maryland and John Tierney of Massachusetts.

The lawmakers also said DeMarco, acting director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, withheld some of the documents from their request for information about principal reduction reports and other findings from the agency and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

“Contrary to your testimony, we have now obtained a wide range of internal documents demonstrating that Fannie Mae officials conducted detailed, substantive analyses and concluded years ago that principal reduction programs have enormous potential to save U.S. taxpayers significant amounts of money by reducing overall losses from foreclosures following default,” Cummings and Tierney wrote in a letter Tuesday to DeMarco.

The lawmakers said the failure by Fannie Mae to launch a principal reduction program “was not merely a missed opportunity, but a conscious choice that appears to have been based on ideology rather than Fannie Mae’s own data and analyses.”

An FHFA spokeswoman said the agency had just received the letter and had no immediate comment.

Cummings and Tierney have been part of an aggressive campaign by congressional Democrats, Obama administration officials and housing advocates to get Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to start a wide-scale program to reduce the principal owed by struggling homeowners to help keep them out of foreclosure and heal the real estate market.

DeMarco has strongly resisted that push, leading to calls for him to be fired. He has argued there are less costly ways to assist distressed homeowners and that the FHFA’s must protect the $188 billion in taxpayer money pumped into Fannie and Freddie since they were seized by the government in 2008.

Read more here

Share