Financial Regulators ‘Paralyzed’ By Threat Of Wall Street Lawsuits

Regulators Live In Fear They Will Be Sued

Christopher Doering, Reuters via Huffington Post

Some U.S. regulators are “paralyzed” by the threat of lawsuits from Wall Street firms seeking to slow or stop the rollout of rules that would crimp their bottom line, a top U.S. official said on Thursday.

Bart Chilton, a Democratic commissioner at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, said if regulators live in fear of a lawsuit alleging they failed to consider sufficiently the costs and benefits of a rule, rulemaking slows or halts and opponents have succeeded.

Regulators, already months behind in implementing rules from the Dodd-Frank financial reform law passed in 2010, are bracing for additional legal challenges as more regulations are completed.

Insufficient or flawed analysis of the costs of a rule versus the benefits to the public or industry likely will be a reason cited in lawsuits seeking to overturn the measures.

“Sure, people have the right to go to court and challenge things,” Chilton said at a financial conference in New York.

“But regulators need to keep our eye on the ball and not be scared into making rules and regulations weak or ineffective because we are overly concerned about what we call ‘litigation risk’,” he said, according to the text of his speech.

Chilton said the CFTC follows the proper requirements for assessing the cost-benefit analysis (CBA). The agency puts out a proposal, asks for comments and what the cost might be. In some cases, the agency either is not provided with the costs of the regulation or the comments have no use.

“Those who criticize our CBAs should be required to provide … real, verifiable dollars and cents to rebut our analyses,” he said.

Read more here

Share

Obama Consumer Agency May Not Be Able To Oversee Mortgage Firms

Shahien Nasiripour, Huffington Post

The nascent consumer agency dedicated to protecting borrowers from abusive lenders, a cornerstone of the Obama administration’s efforts to reform the financial industry, will not be able to regulate the kinds of lenders that helped cause the crisis if the White House doesn’t meet a key deadline, federal auditors say.

Firms like New Century Financial, Ameriquest, Fremont General and Countrywide Financial — lenders that aren’t banks and fall outside the bounds of regular federal supervision — made the kinds of shoddy mortgage loans that ultimately led to the housing crisis. The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, currently led by Elizabeth Warren on an interim basis, is supposed to change that by putting them under the umbrella of a robust federal regulator.

But if the White House can’t get a nominee through the Senate by July, the bureau will lack the authority to supervise nonbank lenders, according to a Jan. 10 report by the inspectors general of the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve obtained by The Huffington Post. In six months, the agency officially assumes the power formally held by bank regulators. Bloomberg News first reported on the existence of the report Wednesday afternoon.

The dilemma poses a challenge to the Obama administration, which sold the agency to Congress and the industry in part based on the promise that it will help level the playing field between banks and nonbanks when it comes to government oversight. Banks have long been regulated by federal agencies and subject to regular audits. Nonbanks, like home mortgage and payday lenders, have been subject to sporadic oversight, at best. Such companies have been hit with billions in fines and legal settlements in response to accusations they engaged in abusive and predatory lending.

Read more here

Share

The Rise and Fall of Bear Stearns

Alan “Ace” Greenberg, the Wall Street firm’s defiant former CEO, discloses his regrets, his beef with mortgage brokers, and why he thinks financial reform isn’t necessary.

From Newsweek

Wall Street—according to former Bear Stearns CEO Alan “Ace” Greenberg—used to be a gentlemanly place where Midwestern boys made good, partners carpooled together to downtown offices, and the keys to success simply meant selling poor-performing stocks quickly.

Greenberg puts forth this utopian history in his new book, The Rise and Fall of Bear Stearns, which he co-wrote with Mark Singer following the collapse of the storied bank. Greenberg recently sat down with NEWSWEEK’s Nancy Cook at his new office on the third floor of JPMorgan, the financial firm that acquired Bear Stearns in May 2008. There Greenberg talked about his regrets, his beef with mortgage brokers, and the reasons why financial reform is unnecessary. Excerpts:

Do you regret anything about your time at Bear Stearns?
No, I don’t. There’s very little in my whole life that I’d do over again. There were a lot of forks in the road, and most of the time I took the correct one. Certainly at Bear Stearns, I think that I didn’t make many mistakes. But, you know, you have to keep in mind that the only people who don’t make mistakes are the ones who don’t do anything. After the collapse, I think there were three people working on books. All of them wanted my cooperation. Then when the books came out—I’m not blaming the writers—but their sources were just so far off base that it was sickening. It was then that I said, “I have to set the record straight for me, my children, and my grandchildren because this is just not what happened.” My book has accomplished that purpose, as far as I’m concerned.

Do you feel like you, as a businessman, learned anything following the financial collapse?
Nothing that I didn’t know before.

You have a really interesting line in the book in which you talk about how presidents of companies never really know what goes on. Can you elaborate?
I don’t care how much you watch things or how acutely involved you are, there are probably bad things that happen. We had three people whose job was to constantly check on people, but their job wasn’t to check on the purchasing department. They were to supposed to check on the traders. I hate to say it, but every firm that has a purchasing department [should] beware. They are presented with so many opportunities to do wrong. The only way you can protect yourself would be to fire everyone who works in the purchasing department.

Read more here: http://www.newsweek-interactive.com/2010/06/22/the-rise-and-fall-of-bear-stearns.html?from=rss#

Share

Janet Tavakoli Explains Derivatives To Max Keiser – Wall Street Financial Terrorism

Share