Michigan agrees to foreclosure settlement

Deal may net $500M for state’s strapped mortgage holders

Brian O’Connor, Detroit News

constipated Bill Schuette

MI AG Bill Schuette

Checks for as much as $2,000 could be headed to Michigan residents who wrongly lost their homes to foreclosure between 2008 and 2011, Attorney General Bill Schuette announced Tuesday.

The state should get more than half a billion dollars, Schuette said, as part of a nationwide settlement worth up to $25 billion between the attorneys general of more than 40 states that is still being finalized.

The negotiations with five major lenders — Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup and Ally Financial — would settle complaints that they foreclosed on homes with illegal, forged or incomplete documents, or wrongly turned down mortgage modifications. The deal wouldn’t absolve lenders of all wrong-doing, and homeowners would retain the right to sue.

The deadline for states to sign on was Monday, but those with significant foreclosure problems — including California, Florida, Massachusetts and others — are still negotiating. Schuette said he expected the agreement to be finalized this week. It then goes to a federal judge for approval. Tuesday was the first time the attorney general’s office had announced it would join the settlement, which has been led by the Iowa attorney general and been in the works for more than a year.

“We’ve been following it closely and felt that this was an important step…,” Schuette said.

Beyond the cash settlements to improperly foreclosed homeowners, Schuette expects the state to get $101 million that he wants used to aid trouble homeowners in the state, including foreclosure counseling, restitution to people who have been scammed in phony foreclosure prevention schemes, and aid to veterans and children left homeless by foreclosure.

The prospect of more money to bolster foreclosure prevention programs sounds good to Mary Lou Keenon, communications director at Michigan State Housing Development Authority.

“We’re very excited about it,” Keenon said. “Any time we can have funds for helping with the foreclosure issue in Michigan, we’re happy.”

Read more here

Share

Florida Barbie Feeling Heat For Mishandling Robo-Signing Talks

Bondi Issues Cryptic One Sentence Press Release

Steve Dibert, MFI-Miami

Florida BarbieAfter a year of nonstop criticism of the way she has handled the foreclosure fraud crisis brought on by several of her campaign donors, Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi issued a cryptic one sentence press release.  Looks like she’s feeling the political heat now that the Florida legislature is in session.

February 7, 2012
Media Contact: Jenn Meale
Phone: (850) 245-0150

TALLAHASSEE, Fla.–Attorney General Pam Bondi remains engaged in the settlement discussions in order to ensure that Floridians receive their fair share in any agreement and that bank mortgage servicers are held accountable. 

 

Share

Will state AGs Sacrifice Grandma’s Pension In Robo-Signing Accord?

Will the Attorneys General Sell Out the Pension Funds?

Abigail Caplovitz Field, Huffington Post

A shocking aspect of the proposed foreclosure fraud settlement among bailed-out banks, the state attorneys general, and the feds has rightly gotten a lot of attention, namely the bailed-out banks’ ability to pay their “penalty” with other people’s money. I confess, when I first heard about it, I figured it was a testament to the federal government’s craven capitulation to the bailed-out banks. (Let’s call them the B.O.B.s, rhymes with S.O.B.s) But now I know it’s much worse than that, thanks to excellent reporting by David Dayen. The federal government reallywants the B.O.B.s to use pension fund money to pay their “penalty.”

Now, readers know I’m not exactly a Pollyanna, but I feel like one now. See, I thought our federal government understood that the right way to penalize someone with a fine was to actually make them pay the bill. I thought the feds realized the best way to punish the banks was to have them cough up cash into a BP spill-type fund, and have 50 special masters (one per state) use it to pay down mortgages, thereby punishing banks and helping homeowners. I just figured the feds had rushed things so much, doing essentially no investigation, that they didn’t have the goods to leverage a better deal. But no. The feds see the banks’ ability to spend firefighters’, teachers’ and cops’ money as a design feature, not a flaw.

(Yes, private investors besides pension funds are affected too. I am fixating on the pension funds because attorneys general usually protect state pension funds from theft.)

See, on a conference call that included Dayen, HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan was boasting about how the settlement would deliver up to $40ish billion in principal reductions. That boast amazed people, because that number’s never been on the table; at best it’s been $17 billion in principal reduction, plus penalties of $8 billion. Donovan then explained the feds are um, banking on the B.O.B.s using other people’s money to pay the penalty. See, the banks only get 50 cents “credit” toward the penalty total for every $1 of other people’s money they write down. So when Donovan says the feds are expecting to get $2 or more in principal reductions for every $1 in “penalty” total, he apparently means the feds are hoping every dime of principal reduction comes out of a pocket other than the B.O.B.s’.

How can the AGs wink and nod and sign off on a deal that everyone expects will steal billions from investors, including pension funds? The NY AG’s office under Eric Schneiderman’s predecessor, Andrew Cuomo, incarcerated people for stealing from the pension fund. Schneiderman himself has sued Bank of New York Mellon for defrauding the pension fund. How can he possibly ink a deal that could take money from the fund for harm the fund didn’t cause?

Read more here

Share

As Florida Barbie Makes Excuses For LPS, Another AG Files Robo-Signing Lawsuit

Another attorney general pursues robo-signing forgery case, not Bondi

Kimberly Miller, Palm Beach Post

Chris KosterMissouri Attorney General Chris Koster announced this morning a 136-count indictment against the DocX foreclosure processing company for forgery and making false declarations related to mortgage documents.

Nevada and Michigan are pursuing similar claims against DocX, a now closed subsidiary of the Jacksonville-based Lender Processing Services.

Today’s indictment alleges that the person whose name appears on 68 notarized deeds of release on behalf of the lender is not the person who actually signed the paperwork, according to a press release. The name that appears on the documents is the infamous Linda Green, who was the focus of a 60 Minutes episode last year that featured Palm Beach County foreclosure fighter Lynn Szymoniak.

“The grand jury indictment alleges that mass-produced fraudulent signatures on notarized real estate documents constitutes forgery,” Koster said. “Today’s indictment reflects our firm conviction that when you sign your name to a legal document, it matters.”

Florida’s attorney general’s office has said that the so-called “surrogate signing” that occurred at DocX may not be forgery under state statute because there was no intent to defraud on behalf of the signer.

Read more here

Share