Florida Bar Is Finally Investigating Foreclosure Attorneys On Both Sides Of Fight

Foreclosure lawyer probes left up to Florida Bar

Kimberly Miller, Palm Beach Post

The Florida Bar’s investigations into foreclosure fraud by its members jumped 63 percent in the past year, but no disciplinary actions against attorneys have been levied since complaints began to mount in the fall of 2010.

The responsibility to hold lawyers accountable for foreclosure misconduct now rests solely with the Florida Bar after the state attorney general’s investigation into high-volume foreclosure law firms collapsed this week.

Since March of last year, the number of foreclosure fraud investigations of attorneys by the Bar grew from 222 cases to 362. During the same time period, about 130 cases were closed with no findings of fault. There are 229 pending cases.

Despite the lack of punitive action, Arne Vanstrum, associate director of lawyer regulation for the Florida Bar, said the regulatory group is taking the investigations seriously. And while the attorney general’s probe focused on illegal activity, the Bar’s review also includes scrutiny of ethical violations, he said.

“We’re putting a lot of resources into this,” Vanstrum said Friday, a day after Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi announced an unfavorable court ruling that effectively shut down her foreclosure mill investigations. “These cases are unique in that it’s very widespread, not just in Florida but nationwide.”

All of the leading partners in the seven firms targeted for state investigation remain members in good standing with the Bar.

Specifics of the Bar investigations are not public, but complaints generally include forged signatures on court documents, bad notarizations and backdated paperwork.

Scores of attorneys – sometimes just out of law school – have worked at Florida’s big foreclosure firms since home repossessions went full throttle in 2008.

Sanctions for attorneys guilty of misconduct range from public reprimand to disbarment.

Tampa-based foreclosure defense attorney Mark Stopa said he’s concerned that David J. Stern, once dubbed the foreclosure king of Florida, hasn’t faced reprimand.

Stern’s Broward-based firm collapsed in the fall of 2010 after the start of the state investigation and subsequent loss of clients. By early 2011, he announced he was closing shop, leaving as many as 100,000 cases statewide in limbo.

Read more here

Share

Did Florida Barbie’s Foreclosure Investigation Fizzle Because Of Corruption Or Lack Of Interest?

Florida attorney general’s attempt to subpoena foreclosure mills stalls

Kim Miller, Palm Beach Post

Florida BarbieFlorida’s once-heralded foreclosure mill investigations have fizzled as the attorney general’s office has failed to find the right strategy to continue its pursuit and three law firms call for the cases to be dismissed.

This week, an attempt to have the Florida Supreme Court weigh in on whether the state has the authority to subpoena the Law Offices of David J. Stern was denied by the 4th District Court of Appeal.

The decision effectively ends the investigations into complaints that the firms doctored court paperwork in an attempt to speed foreclosures.

“It means the buck has stopped” with the appeals court, said Royal Palm Beach-based foreclosure defense attorney Tom Ice. “No appeal to the Florida Supreme Court.”

Even before Wednesday’s ruling – from the very beginning of the investigations – there has been uncertainty about how to prosecute a civil case against the firms.

In 2010, flooded with complaints about unbridled foreclosures, former Assistant Attorneys General Theresa Edwards and June Clarkson said they felt their only option to protect consumers was to go after the law firms under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.

The act governs trade or commerce, but it is unclear whether it can be used against law firms. Attorneys for the firms argue that what they are accused of did not qualify as “trade or commerce” and that the statute is intended to protect consumers. Technically, the consumers were the banks, they say.

Now, more than a year and a half after the investigations were announced during a news conference convened by former Attorney General Bill McCollum, Edwards and Clarkson have been fired, two of the firms have closed, and it is debatable whether there is a legal path to hold the Florida firms accountable.

“This denial is significant,” Attorney General Pam Bondi’s office said in a statement. “The attorney general’s office will now assess each of its seven pending investigations into law firms for potential misconduct in foreclosure cases to determine whether there are other avenues through which the office can pursue foreclosurerelated misconduct.”

In interviews taken as part of a state inspector general’s inquiry into the May firing of Edwards and Clarkson, one leading investigator said that despite increased resources dedicated to the investigations, the state was not close to filing formal complaints.

“The Florida Office of the Attorney General still cannot figure it out,” the January report paraphrases former Chief Assistant Attorney General Robert Julian as saying about why Edwards and Clarkson shouldn’t be blamed for an inability to build a case against the firms.

The Tampa-based Florida Default Law Group points to the inspector general’s report as evidence of why the cases should end.

“It is our understanding that the attorney general’s investigation into our firm has been completed and now that the Office of Inspector General report shows the lack of any substance supporting the investigation, it should be dismissed,” said Ron Wolfe, Florida Default Law Group managing partner.

Read more here

 

Share

Florida Bar Foreclosure Ethics Opinion Is As Impotent As Bob Dole

Bar’s ethics opinion little chill to foreclosures

Tom Lyons, Sarasota Herald-Tribune

A year ago, the Florida Bar issued an ethics opinion that was a warning for every mortgage lawyer who helps lenders foreclose on Florida homes.

It must have made many of them squirm a bit, but maybe not enough.

By then, everyone paying even a bit of attention knew huge numbers of foreclosure cases had been filed with iffy mortgage documents, most purporting to prove the plaintiff’s right to foreclose.

Many documents had been recently “robo-signed” by people who were not really vice presidents of mortgage companies, as claimed, but menial workers paid to blindly sign stacks of papers. The signers had no idea what was in them or when or if a loan had really been been made or sold.

Sometimes the signature was authenticated with a notary stamp that showed an impossible signing date, or other clues that helped defense lawyers realize the documents were an attempt to replace original ones that could not be found or had never existed.

While lawyers for lenders portrayed this creative document creation as simply catching up on paperwork reflecting legitimate mortgage ownership transfers, it often involved making false or uncertain claims to a court in hope no one would notice or object.

It worked, thousands of times.

But it also started to fail at times. As word of possible forgery or fraud got out, some foreclosed homeowners hired lawyers who challenged the documents. Many cases were thrown out of court and many others stalled for years as residents stayed in homes without paying.

Read more here

Share

FHFA Puppet Master Enters The Lion’s Den of NPR

DeMarco Defends Freddie Mac To One Of It’s Biggest Critics

Mark Memmott, NPR

Saying he is “completely puzzled by the notion that there was something immoral that went on here,” the man at the top of the agency that regulates Freddie Mac has explained why he believes the taxpayer-owned mortgage company did nothing wrong when one of its arms, as NPR and ProPublica have reported, “placed multibillion-dollar bets against American homeowners being able to refinance to cheaper mortgages.”

Edward DeMarco told Morning Edition co-host Steve Inskeep in an interview broadcast on today’s show that Freddie Mac’s actions were “in the class of ordinary business transactions.” The “reverse floaters” in Freddie Mac’s investment portfolio, which as NPR has reported “brought in more money for Freddie Mac when homeowners in higher interest-rate loans were unable to qualify for a refinancing,” did not affect the agency’s efforts to stabilize the mortgage market, DeMarco said.

Instead, DeMarco characterized the investments as part of Freddie Mac’s effort to make sure it doesn’t lose money. And he said one of his major responsibilities, is to “make sure Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac undertake activities that don’t cause further losses to the American taxpayer.”

DeMarco is acting director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) — the agency that regulates Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.

Listen to the interview here

 

Share