Michigan agrees to foreclosure settlement

Deal may net $500M for state’s strapped mortgage holders

Brian O’Connor, Detroit News

constipated Bill Schuette

MI AG Bill Schuette

Checks for as much as $2,000 could be headed to Michigan residents who wrongly lost their homes to foreclosure between 2008 and 2011, Attorney General Bill Schuette announced Tuesday.

The state should get more than half a billion dollars, Schuette said, as part of a nationwide settlement worth up to $25 billion between the attorneys general of more than 40 states that is still being finalized.

The negotiations with five major lenders — Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup and Ally Financial — would settle complaints that they foreclosed on homes with illegal, forged or incomplete documents, or wrongly turned down mortgage modifications. The deal wouldn’t absolve lenders of all wrong-doing, and homeowners would retain the right to sue.

The deadline for states to sign on was Monday, but those with significant foreclosure problems — including California, Florida, Massachusetts and others — are still negotiating. Schuette said he expected the agreement to be finalized this week. It then goes to a federal judge for approval. Tuesday was the first time the attorney general’s office had announced it would join the settlement, which has been led by the Iowa attorney general and been in the works for more than a year.

“We’ve been following it closely and felt that this was an important step…,” Schuette said.

Beyond the cash settlements to improperly foreclosed homeowners, Schuette expects the state to get $101 million that he wants used to aid trouble homeowners in the state, including foreclosure counseling, restitution to people who have been scammed in phony foreclosure prevention schemes, and aid to veterans and children left homeless by foreclosure.

The prospect of more money to bolster foreclosure prevention programs sounds good to Mary Lou Keenon, communications director at Michigan State Housing Development Authority.

“We’re very excited about it,” Keenon said. “Any time we can have funds for helping with the foreclosure issue in Michigan, we’re happy.”

Read more here

Share

Will state AGs Sacrifice Grandma’s Pension In Robo-Signing Accord?

Will the Attorneys General Sell Out the Pension Funds?

Abigail Caplovitz Field, Huffington Post

A shocking aspect of the proposed foreclosure fraud settlement among bailed-out banks, the state attorneys general, and the feds has rightly gotten a lot of attention, namely the bailed-out banks’ ability to pay their “penalty” with other people’s money. I confess, when I first heard about it, I figured it was a testament to the federal government’s craven capitulation to the bailed-out banks. (Let’s call them the B.O.B.s, rhymes with S.O.B.s) But now I know it’s much worse than that, thanks to excellent reporting by David Dayen. The federal government reallywants the B.O.B.s to use pension fund money to pay their “penalty.”

Now, readers know I’m not exactly a Pollyanna, but I feel like one now. See, I thought our federal government understood that the right way to penalize someone with a fine was to actually make them pay the bill. I thought the feds realized the best way to punish the banks was to have them cough up cash into a BP spill-type fund, and have 50 special masters (one per state) use it to pay down mortgages, thereby punishing banks and helping homeowners. I just figured the feds had rushed things so much, doing essentially no investigation, that they didn’t have the goods to leverage a better deal. But no. The feds see the banks’ ability to spend firefighters’, teachers’ and cops’ money as a design feature, not a flaw.

(Yes, private investors besides pension funds are affected too. I am fixating on the pension funds because attorneys general usually protect state pension funds from theft.)

See, on a conference call that included Dayen, HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan was boasting about how the settlement would deliver up to $40ish billion in principal reductions. That boast amazed people, because that number’s never been on the table; at best it’s been $17 billion in principal reduction, plus penalties of $8 billion. Donovan then explained the feds are um, banking on the B.O.B.s using other people’s money to pay the penalty. See, the banks only get 50 cents “credit” toward the penalty total for every $1 of other people’s money they write down. So when Donovan says the feds are expecting to get $2 or more in principal reductions for every $1 in “penalty” total, he apparently means the feds are hoping every dime of principal reduction comes out of a pocket other than the B.O.B.s’.

How can the AGs wink and nod and sign off on a deal that everyone expects will steal billions from investors, including pension funds? The NY AG’s office under Eric Schneiderman’s predecessor, Andrew Cuomo, incarcerated people for stealing from the pension fund. Schneiderman himself has sued Bank of New York Mellon for defrauding the pension fund. How can he possibly ink a deal that could take money from the fund for harm the fund didn’t cause?

Read more here

Share

Donovan And 40 AGs Sellout For A Pittance

More than 40 states to sign foreclosure settlement

Jon Prior, Housing Wire

Shaun DonovanMore than 40 states will sign a settlement with the top five mortgage servicers over alleged foreclosure abuses that arose more than one year ago, Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller said in a statement Monday night.

Last week, Miller extended the deadline to Monday for states wanting to sign the deal with Bank of America ($7.97 0%)Wells Fargo($30.20 0%)Citigroup ($33.30 0%)JPMorgan Chase ($38.14-0.14%) and Ally Financial ($22.95 0%).

“The sign-on deadline for the proposed joint state-federal mortgage servicing settlement passed Monday with more than 40 states signing on,” Miller said “This enables us to move forward into the very final stages of remaining work. Federal and state officials, as well as representatives from the banks, continue to address matters that they must complete before finalizing any settlement.”

Throughout the day, those representing states hardest hit by the foreclosure crisis signaled they are still working on the details of the settlement.

“We’re closer,” a spokesperson for California AG Kamala Harris said.

“My office is continuing to review the intricate draft settlement terms and advocating for improvements to address Nevada’s needs,” said Nevada AG Catherine Cortez Masto in a statement. “Receipt of important state specific information is necessary to make our determination and my office is still in discussions regarding that information.”

Florida AG Pam Bondi said she “remains involved in the settlement discussions in order to reach the best resolution for Floridians and all Americans.” She signed a joint letter with other republican AGs in 2010, saying a settlement that would involve principal reduction creates a moral hazard and lead to more strategic defaults.

 

Read more here

Share

The Rumors Of A Robo-Signing Agreement Today Have Been Greatly Exaggerated

State AGs faced Monday deadline to join mortgage deal

Aruna Viswanatha and Karen Freifeld, Reuters

A multi-state mortgage settlement in the works for more than a year will likely be pushed back again as dissident U.S. states continue to press specific concerns and ignore a Monday deadline to decide whether they will sign it.

States had been given two weeks to assess a proposed settlement, under which top U.S. banks would pay up to $25 billion in exchange for resolving civil government lawsuits about misconduct in servicing home loans and pursuing faulty foreclosures.

But on Monday, as a close-of-business deadline loomed, many states had not yet reached a decision.

Some states and activist groups have been concerned the proposed deal would release banks from too many claims and does not provide enough relief to homeowners.

California Attorney General Kamala Harris, whose state would see homeowners get some $6 billion to $8 billion if it participates, was not expected to issue any statement on Monday, a person familiar with the matter said.

On Friday, Harris told Reuters she was “less concerned with the timeline than the details” of the settlement.

A New York lawsuit filed on Friday against JPMorgan Chase , Bank of America and Wells Fargo has also become a stumbling block, according to a person briefed on the negotiations.

This person said on Monday that the banks are balking at the lawsuit from New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman that accuses them of fraud in their use of the electronic mortgage registry MERS.

The lawsuit is based on claims that were expected to be resolved through the settlement.

The multi-state settlement talks are focusing on the three banks named in Schneiderman’s suit, as well as Citigroup and Ally Financial.

Schneiderman has been a key opponent of the proposed settlement.

However, Schneiderman said Jan. 27 that the liability releases in the draft settlement had become narrow enough so that a full investigation by a new mortgage crisis unit that he will help lead could move forward.

Jennifer Givner, press secretary for Schneiderman, declined to comment on Monday.

HOLD OUTS

Other states continued to weigh the details until the last minute.

In a statement, Nevada Attorney General Catherine Masto said her office is continuing to review the settlement and is advocating for improvements to address Nevada-specific needs.

Read more here

Share