Tsunami Of Foreclosure Complaints Flood Florida Bar

Kimberly Miller, Palm Beach Post

The Florida Bar has fielded nearly 1,400 complaints against attorneys relating to the housing crisis, an unprecedented amount that has buried investigators and forced the group to rethink how it will handle widespread grievances in the future.

Beginning in the fall of 2010, as foreclosures receded because of robo-signing revelations, a wave of consumer complaints alleging attorney misconduct began to hit the Bar.

The complaint categories – mortgage fraud, foreclosure fraud, loan modification misconduct – didn’t even exist three years ago, said Ken Marvin, director of lawyer regulation for the Florida Bar.

His first recorded loan modification complaint was in November 2010. Today, 793 cases have been opened.

“They just started coming in and the numbers were incredible,” Marvin said. “We never even had a loan modification category or mortgage fraud or foreclosure fraud, and we had to create all of this because we wanted to track these reliably.”

The Bar hired an additional attorney to specifically process foreclosure and mortgage complaints, which make up about 17 percent of all open Bar cases.

“The most important thing is to get it right,” Marvin said.

As of late March, 208 of the 1,394 housing-related cases have resulted in some kind of disciplinary action against an attorney, which can range from a public reprimand to disbarment.

But while foreclosure fraud may be the most high-profile type of case following the collapse of the Law Offices of David J. Stern last year, no punitive actions have been taken so far against an attorney in that category. Of 377 foreclosure fraud cases opened, 234 are still pending.

“Oftentimes you have a disappointed client, but that doesn’t mean there was bad action by the attorney,” said Boca Raton real estate attorney Marlyn Wiener.

“Everybody pushes the fraud button, that’s everyone’s first reaction. You may find sloppy processing, but not necessarily fraud.”

Specifics of the Bar investigations are not public, but foreclosure complaints generally include forged signatures on court documents, bad notarizations and backdated paperwork.

Read more here

Share

The Ghost Of David Stern Still Haunts Florida

Thousands of foreclosures in limbo one year after Stern firm’s collapse

Kimberly Miller, Palm Beach Post

The so-called foreclosure king of Florida knew his reign was over four months before his law firm’s doors would officially shutter.

“There’s nothing left for you here. There’s nothing left for me here. We’re done. And that’s the end of the story,” one of David J. Stern’s chief employees remembers him telling her in November 2010, according to her deposition.

The conversation followed what Stern characterized in his own deposition as the “unexpected catastrophic event” of being fired by the two biggest clients of his massive home repossession empire.

On March 31, 2011, he closed the firm, leaving as many as 100,000 Florida foreclosures, or nearly a third of the state’s backlog, in limbo.

A year later, thousands of his company’s former cases are still sputtering through the courts, sometimes stalled as new attorneys get their bearings or even dismissed so fresh paperwork can be filed, foreclosure defense attorneys say.

In fact, in the year since the epic collapse of Stern’s firm, much is unresolved.

  • Despite 377 complaints to the Florida Bar related to foreclosure fraud, not a single attorney has been sanctioned. Stern remains a member in good standing.
  • The attorney general’s investigation into foreclosure mills withered this year when the state’s power to subpoena them was quashed.
  • A required mediation program ordered by the Florida Supreme Court for lenders and homeowners died in December after a lack of participation and cooperation rendered negotiations impotent.

And the 368,000-case backlog in the state’s foreclosure courts has grown as the Stern firm’s wayward files added to the logjam, some attorneys said.

“Let’s face it : Florida was struggling with foreclosures in the first place,” said Sylvia Ayalon, a former analyst at the Consumer Mortgage Audit Center in Fort Lauderdale, who now works for Fembi Mortgage in Miami. “That combined with a defective process, the large footprint of the Stern firm, and the backlog just continues to grow.”

Still, there has been some progress in the foreclosure courts since the unprecedented rise and fall of The Law Offices of David J. Stern.

Repairs to the Stern files, where necessary, leave stronger legal claims that could protect future home buyers from having to defend title to their home, said foreclosure defense attorney Frank Albear of LaBovick Law Group in Palm Beach Gardens.

Also, Florida’s courts have started paying more attention to allegations of fraud and the defenses of homeowners, said Roy Oppenheim of Oppenheim Law in Weston.

“The entire chapter before the collapse was one of the darkest hours in the history of the Florida Bar and jurisprudence,” Oppenheim said. “But now, arguments we’ve been making are resonating, we’re getting cases dismissed, and judges are no longer taking at face value everything the banks say.”

Read more here

Share

The One Good Thing That Came From The Mortgage Settlement

Servicing settlement means more oversight of foreclosure law firms

Kerri Panchuk, Housing Wire

foreclosure mill oversightThe $25 billion mortgage servicing settlement means more due diligence work for servicers when assessing the work of law firms and other third parties assisting with foreclosures and bankruptcies.

The national mortgage servicer settlement involving the nation’s top five mortgage servicers shows firms taxed with ensuring that all law firms, trustees, subservicers and other third parties handling foreclosure or mortgage servicing activities are in line with best practices outlined in the settlement agreement.

The settlement, agreed to in February, was officially filed with the court on Monday.

Servicers are required to survey the firm’s qualifications, practices, information security for document handling and financial viability, according to settlement documents.

The agreement with the state attorneys general requires servicers to amend their agreement and engagement letters to ensure they comply with all federal and state policies and procedures.

Servicers also are on notice via the settlement that they must deliver timely notice of a third-party provider’s failure to adequately perform a given task or comply with procedures.

Firms on the servicing side also are called to ensure third-party companies have access to all relevant information from the servicing shop to handle court and foreclosure proceedings.

Read more here

Share

Whistleblowing Florida Attorney to Receive $18M As Part Of National Mortgage Settlement

Justin T. Hilley, Housing Wire

Lynn Szymoniak's big paydayA well-known Florida attorney and whistleblower who appeared on ’60 Minutes’ to make allegations of robo-signing against mortgage servicers will receive $18 million to settle her lawsuit over the foreclosure of her condo.

The funds will go to Lynn Szymoniak, the first in South Carolina to file a lawsuit under the whistleblower provision of the False Claims Act to settle her claims over the 2009 foreclosure of her condominium unit.

The condo is in West Palm Beach, Fla., but Szymoniak filed her lawsuit in South Carolina after her attorneys presented her case to the state’s U.S. Attorneys Office because of its “very active” false claims practice, said Bill Nettles, U.S. Attorney for the District of South Carolina. The office is devoting more resources to false claims cases, recently doubling the number of attorneys handling those case types.

The $18 million figure is a line item in the government’s $25 billion settlement with the nation’s five largest mortgage servicers, details of which were revealed in court filings Monday. The funds going to Szymoniak will come out of a $95 million payment to the Treasury that originated from Szymoniak’s initial lawsuit related to the improper foreslosure on her condo.

Szymoniak was featured on “60 Minutes” in 2011 for uncovering details of banks’ robo-signing of mortgages documents.

The state attorneys general and the Department of Justice filed the settlement with the servicers Monday. About $1.5 billion of the total settlement will be used as a “Borrower Payment Fund.” Borrowers foreclosed on between Jan. 1, 2008, and Dec. 31, 2011, who qualify for the payouts, could receive up to $2,000 each.

Read more here

Share