Lehman Docs Show Wall Street Arrogance Led To Financial Collapse

William D. Cohan, Bloomberg

If one wants to understand the full complicity of Wall Street in the Great Recession, look no further than the voluminous package of pre-collapseLehman Brothers documents that have been made available by the law firm Jenner & Block LLP, which has acted as the coroner in the Lehman post-mortem.

Most important, the cache dispels the myth that Dick Fuld, chief executive officer of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., and his close associates were unaware of the risks their business faced in 2007 and 2008. That would be bad enough, but the more devastating reality is that Fuld and his sycophants were warned repeatedly but were blinded by their hubris.

The records confirm, yet again, that the “forces-out-of- our-control” argument we hear from Wall Street leaders is bunk. It is the ill-advised behavior of one banker after another, day in and day out, that leads to the sort of devastating financial crisis we are only now emerging from.

For instance, at a Lehman board meeting in September 2007, according to a copy of the presentation in the data cache, Lehman executives presented a clear summary of the brewing crisis. “The initial tremors were felt at the end of 2006,” the board was told, “when the poor loan performance of sub- prime borrowers began to be a cause for concern in the marketplace. This was evidenced by a gradual spread widening in the asset backed index.” The presentation continued: “The market continued to widen as it became apparent that the performance problems in mortgage loans was not going to abate and was no longer limited to the sub-prime market but also affecting the Alt-A product.”

Read more here

Share

Goldman Sachs fined $22 million over ‘huddles’

Ronald D. Orol, MarketWatch

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. settled charges with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday, agreeing to pay a $22 million fine over allegations that the Wall Street bank didn’t have policies to prevent analysts from sharing nonpublic information with the firm’s traders.

The exchanges took place in weekly “huddles,” where Goldman’s research analysts met to provide “their best trading ideas” to the firm’s traders and later passed them on to a select group of “top clients,” the SEC said.

“Despite being on notice from the SEC about the importance of such controls, Goldman GS -3.75%  failed to implement policies and procedures that adequately controlled the risk that research analysts could preview upcoming ratings changes with select traders and clients,” said Robert Khuzami, the SEC’s director of enforcement.

The agency said the “huddles” practice took place between 2006 and 2011, and involved sales personnel. At the meetings, analysts discussed short-term trading ideas and traders discussed their views on the markets.

In 2007, according to the SEC, the New York-based investment bank began a program known as the “Asymmetric Service Initiative,” where analysts shared information and trading ideas from meetings with some investor clients.

The SEC noted that in 2003 Goldman paid a $5 million penalty to settle charges that, among other violations, it failed to set up and enforce written policies to misuse material nonpublic information obtained from outside consultants about 30-year U.S. Treasury bonds. Goldman settled the proceeding without admitting or denying the findings.

Read more here

Share

Feds To Crack Down On Firms Not Included In Mortgage Settlement

JESSICA SILVER-GREENBERG, NY Times\

Federal regulators are poised to crack down on eight financial firms that are not part of the recent government settlement over homeforeclosure practices involving sloppy, inaccurate or forged documents.

Last week, a senior Federal Reserve official recommended fines for these additional firms, raising questions about how deep foreclosure problems run through the banking industry.

In addition, judges, lawyers and advocates for homeowners say that people are still losing their homes despite improper documentation and other flaws in the foreclosure process often involving these firms.

The eight firms cited by the Federal Reserve — HSBC’s United States bank division, SunTrust Bank, MetLife, U.S. Bancorp, PNC Financial Services, EverBank, OneWest and Goldman Sachs — should be fined for “unsafe and unsound practices in their loan servicing and foreclosure processing,” Suzanne G. Killian, a senior associate director of the Federal Reserve’s Division of Consumer and Community Affairs, told lawmakers last month in a House Oversight Committee hearing in Brooklyn.

The recommendation is the culmination of an investigation begun nearly two years ago over accusations that bank representatives had been churning through hundreds of documents a day in foreclosure proceedings without reviewing them for accuracy, a practice known as robo-signing.

Some see the Fed’s recommendation as an attempt to push these firms to agree to the terms of the broader mortgage settlement involving the state attorneys general and federal officials. During those settlement talks, federal regulators contacted other institutions in hopes that they would also agree to the terms, according to people briefed on the negotiations.

Read more here

Share

Goldman Sachs Gives Romney A Golden Shower…Of Cash

Goldman Fills Romney’s War Chest With Cash As They Snub Obama

Dan Freed, The Street

Mitt Romney Golden ShowersGoldman Sachs(GS_) donors to the 2012 Presidential campaign overwhelmingly favored Republican frontrunner Mitt Romney to President Barack Obama in the month of January, according to data from OpenSecrets.org the website of the Center for Responsive Politics.

Romney raised a total of $25,250 from 15 donors versus just $1500 from three donors for Obama, according to the nonprofit’s website, which does not appear to have any data beyond Jan. 31.

While those totals would not include any funds Obama may have raised from Goldman employees during a $35,800-a-plate Wall Street fundraiser he held earlier this month, they nonetheless represent a big shift from the 2008 campaign, when Obamaraised $1 million from employees of the investment bank.

Obama has gone back and forth between attacking Wall Street and backing away from tough rhetoric during his Presidency, though memories of the whopping $550 million fine Goldman paid to settle Securities and Exchange Commission charges against the bank in 2010 are unlikely to have faded in the minds of Goldman employees. That case caused the bank to lose its bulletproof aura, and injected political risk in a major way into the thinking about how to value Goldman shares.

It also represented a blow to Goldman executives, who have long been proud of their participation in government and politics, something that had been a great asset to the institution but became a liability in the wake of the 2008 crisis as many people argued the government was essentially for sale to well-connected firms like Goldman.

Read more here

 

 

Share