DeMarco Defers Decision On Principal Write-Downs

Fannie, Freddie leader’s mortgage-cutting dilemma

Kathleen Pender, San Francisco Chronicle

Ed DeMarco, the man who oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, is still mulling whether to allow permanent principal reductions on mortgages owned or guaranteed by the taxpayer-supported entities.

DeMarco, acting director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, said he would have a decision by the end of April, but on Friday his spokeswoman said the decision “is being deferred” while the agency “continues to work on its principal forgiveness analysis.”

Fannie and Freddie allow temporary reductions – known as principal forbearance – on some underwater loans.

But DeMarco is under intense pressure to let Fannie and Freddie permanently forgive principal for some borrowers.

The pressure is coming from troubled homeowners and their advocates, the Obama administration and some legislators (mostly Democrats) and economists. They say DeMarco is taking his job – preserving Fannie and Freddie assets – too zealously and is single-handedly blocking a recovery in the housing market.

Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-San Jose, has called DeMarco an idiot for not reducing principal. “The private sector is doing more principal reductions than the brain-dead government,” she says.

Peter Goodman, business editor at the Huffington Post, labeled him “America’s most dangerous man.”

Van Jones, co-founder of Rebuild the Dream, called DeMarco an “ideologue” in an interview on KQED radio this month.

There are at least 11 million borrowers who owe more than their homes are worth. Jones and others would like to see lenders reduce all of these underwater loans to market value.

Many not theirs

But only about 4.5 million of those are owned or guaranteed by Fannie and Freddie, and only a subset of them would be eligible for partial principal forgiveness if DeMarco allows it.

“This particular fight is about adding one more option to the modification menu for about 700,000 loans,” says Jed Kolko, chief economist with Trulia.

It would affect only homeowners with a Fannie or Freddie loan on their primary residence who are underwater and behind on their payments and qualify for the government’s Home Affordable Modification Program.
Read more here

 

 

Share

Disgusting: BofA Kicks Disabled Girl And Mom To The Street After Giving Them A Mod

BofA Knew Loan Was to Renovate The House To Accommodate Girl’s Cerebral Palsy

Gale Holland, Los Angeles Times

BofA kicks disabled child from homeDirma Rodriguez had five minutes to gather her things and vacate the West Adams house she and her severely disabled daughter had lived in for more than 25 years.

As a property manager changed the locks, Rodriguez fluttered back and forth from the yard — where a pile of stuff lay by the kitchen stove — to her car, where her daughter, Ingrid Ortiz, sat screaming and crying.

How Rodriguez and Ortiz ended up in this predicament is a long, messy story that resounds with a misery all too common in this age of foreclosure.

Rodriguez took out a loan to retrofit her house for her special-needs daughter. After she fell behind on her payments, the Bank of America lowered her monthly obligation, but then sold the house at a foreclosure auction last September. The new owner, a house flipper from El Segundo called West Ridge Rentals, moved to evict the family.

I came upon Rodriguez’s story through Occupy Fights Foreclosure, the latest offshoot of the 99% movement. Occupy interceded to stop her eviction March 26, and it just may have saved her home for good. Bank of America said last week it is considering a loan modification that would return the home to Rodriguez and her family.

But how did it come to this? Bank of America took a $45-billion bailout from taxpayers when it got into financial trouble. Why couldn’t the bank have shown Rodriguez — a widow whose life was already a trial — the same courtesy when she got squeezed?

Read more here

Share

More Whistleblowers Are Rewarded In Mortgage Settlement

Lynn Szymoniak and Four Others Rewarded

Cora Currier, ProPublica

Buried in the sweeping mortgage settlement with banks, for which final documents were filed this week, are five whistleblower cases that shed light on the litany of foreclosure abuses by the banks.

According to one suit, Bank of America allegedly passed bad loans on to the Federal Housing Administration. According to another, the bank allegedly denied qualified homeowners access to HAMP, the government’s loan modification program.

The suits were all settled as part of the overall $25 billion mortgage deal. They were filed under the False Claims Act, which provides incentives for whistleblowers to come forward in cases in which someone has defrauded the government. Whistleblowers can net up to 25 percent of the total settlement from False Claims suits, and in some of these cases, the reward is in the millions.

Details are available for four of the cases; documents in a fifth, against JPMorgan Chase, have not yet been filed in Massachusetts. While the cases were settled as part of the overarching agreement, they still have to be accepted by the courts in which they were originally filed. In reaching the settlements, none of the banks admits or denies the lawsuits’ allegations.

We’ve laid out the details of each case.

Countrywide Defrauded the FHA

Kyle Lagow worked at LandSafe, a contractor of Countrywide, which Bank of America bought in 2008. He brought a suit in 2009 alleging that the company systematically undermined the appraisal process for home loans in order to approve as many as possible:

Read more here

Share

BofA Defrauded HAMP For Profit While Pocketing Incentives

Wanted to Avoid Millions In Losses

Jessica Dye, Reuters via Huffington Post

Bank of America NA prevented homeowners from receiving mortgage-loan modifications under a federal program in order to avoid millions of dollars in losses while benefitting from financial incentives for participating in the program, according to a complaint unsealed in federal court Wednesday.

The suit is the second whistleblower complaint unsealed so far with apparent ties to the $1 billion False Claims Act settlement announced by Bank of America and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York on February 9.

The Bank of America settlement is also part of the sweeping $25 billion agreement reached between state and federal authorities.

Final settlement documents have yet to be filed in the BoA settlement, which the U.S. Attorney’s Office said was the largest ever False Claims Act payout related to mortgage fraud.

The settlement resolved claims that Bank of America’s Countywide Financial subsidiaries defrauded the Federal Housing Administration by inflating appraisals used for government-insured home loans, as well as claims involving the Home Affordable Modification Program, a federal program to help American homeowners facing foreclosure.

The complaint unsealed Wednesday was filed by whistleblower Gregory Mackler, a Colorado resident who said he worked alongside Bank of America executives while an employee at Urban Lending Solutions, a company to which Bank of America contracted some of its HAMP work.

While working at Urban Lending, Mackler said he saw BofA and its loan servicing subsidiary, BAC Homes Loans Servicing LP, implement “business practices designed to intentionally prevent scores of eligible homeowners from becoming eligible or staying eligible for permanent HAMP modification.”

Read more here

Share