Foreclosure Fraud Queen Linda Orlans Stakes Claim In NY

Forms New Law Firm With Former Baum Minions

Jonathan Epstein, Buffalo News

Two former attorneys from Steven J. Baum PC have formed their own Law firm in Amherst to focus on mortgage foreclosures, bankruptcies and other real estate legal matters.

Adam Gross and Amy Polowy joined with Michigan-based attorney Linda Orlans to form Gross, Polowy & Orlans LLC.

The start-up firm has already opened an office in Amherst and employs 18 attorneys and 47 support staff, having hired most from the Baum firm.

Gross Polowy has already assumed a small portion of the 50,000 cases that Baum had leftover when it announced its closure. And it plans to open another office on Long Island, mirroring the geographic footprint of the now-disgraced Baum firm.

The Amherst-based Baum firm was the state’s leading foreclosure law firm, handling more than 40 percent of cases across the state. But the firm, which had been criticized for shoddy work, lost its contracts with mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac after Halloween office party photos surfaced that mocked foreclosure victims.

The firm and an associated document processing firm, which had employed more than 700, including nearly 100 attorneys, announced in could close in late February.

The new firm — known as GPO—said it is working to first stress home retention as a means of distinguishing itself from firms around the state that operate on what Gross called a “race to foreclosure” model.

“We’re not calling ourselves a foreclosure firm. We’re calling ourselves a home retention firm,” said Gross, 46, a downstate attorney who has handled foreclosures since 1998.

“When you look at the array of options available to a servicer, one of them is foreclosure, but the best option is for the borrower to be able to retain home ownership and continue to make payments that are affordable.”

That doesn’t mean it won’t initiate foreclosure proceedings on behalf of its lender clients, he said. For one thing, many servicing guidelines require the foreclosure to be filed even when the borrower and lender are still negotiating a loan modification or other alternative.

Even the state’s new mandatory settlement conferences—a new requirement imposed by state lawmakers before a foreclosure can be completed — do not take effect until after the first foreclosure papers have been filed.

“A home retention, if the borrower can qualify, is the best option,” Gross said. “Anybody representing servicers should take the same approach.”

Read more here

Share

Will state AGs Sacrifice Grandma’s Pension In Robo-Signing Accord?

Will the Attorneys General Sell Out the Pension Funds?

Abigail Caplovitz Field, Huffington Post

A shocking aspect of the proposed foreclosure fraud settlement among bailed-out banks, the state attorneys general, and the feds has rightly gotten a lot of attention, namely the bailed-out banks’ ability to pay their “penalty” with other people’s money. I confess, when I first heard about it, I figured it was a testament to the federal government’s craven capitulation to the bailed-out banks. (Let’s call them the B.O.B.s, rhymes with S.O.B.s) But now I know it’s much worse than that, thanks to excellent reporting by David Dayen. The federal government reallywants the B.O.B.s to use pension fund money to pay their “penalty.”

Now, readers know I’m not exactly a Pollyanna, but I feel like one now. See, I thought our federal government understood that the right way to penalize someone with a fine was to actually make them pay the bill. I thought the feds realized the best way to punish the banks was to have them cough up cash into a BP spill-type fund, and have 50 special masters (one per state) use it to pay down mortgages, thereby punishing banks and helping homeowners. I just figured the feds had rushed things so much, doing essentially no investigation, that they didn’t have the goods to leverage a better deal. But no. The feds see the banks’ ability to spend firefighters’, teachers’ and cops’ money as a design feature, not a flaw.

(Yes, private investors besides pension funds are affected too. I am fixating on the pension funds because attorneys general usually protect state pension funds from theft.)

See, on a conference call that included Dayen, HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan was boasting about how the settlement would deliver up to $40ish billion in principal reductions. That boast amazed people, because that number’s never been on the table; at best it’s been $17 billion in principal reduction, plus penalties of $8 billion. Donovan then explained the feds are um, banking on the B.O.B.s using other people’s money to pay the penalty. See, the banks only get 50 cents “credit” toward the penalty total for every $1 of other people’s money they write down. So when Donovan says the feds are expecting to get $2 or more in principal reductions for every $1 in “penalty” total, he apparently means the feds are hoping every dime of principal reduction comes out of a pocket other than the B.O.B.s’.

How can the AGs wink and nod and sign off on a deal that everyone expects will steal billions from investors, including pension funds? The NY AG’s office under Eric Schneiderman’s predecessor, Andrew Cuomo, incarcerated people for stealing from the pension fund. Schneiderman himself has sued Bank of New York Mellon for defrauding the pension fund. How can he possibly ink a deal that could take money from the fund for harm the fund didn’t cause?

Read more here

Share

Donovan And 40 AGs Sellout For A Pittance

More than 40 states to sign foreclosure settlement

Jon Prior, Housing Wire

Shaun DonovanMore than 40 states will sign a settlement with the top five mortgage servicers over alleged foreclosure abuses that arose more than one year ago, Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller said in a statement Monday night.

Last week, Miller extended the deadline to Monday for states wanting to sign the deal with Bank of America ($7.97 0%)Wells Fargo($30.20 0%)Citigroup ($33.30 0%)JPMorgan Chase ($38.14-0.14%) and Ally Financial ($22.95 0%).

“The sign-on deadline for the proposed joint state-federal mortgage servicing settlement passed Monday with more than 40 states signing on,” Miller said “This enables us to move forward into the very final stages of remaining work. Federal and state officials, as well as representatives from the banks, continue to address matters that they must complete before finalizing any settlement.”

Throughout the day, those representing states hardest hit by the foreclosure crisis signaled they are still working on the details of the settlement.

“We’re closer,” a spokesperson for California AG Kamala Harris said.

“My office is continuing to review the intricate draft settlement terms and advocating for improvements to address Nevada’s needs,” said Nevada AG Catherine Cortez Masto in a statement. “Receipt of important state specific information is necessary to make our determination and my office is still in discussions regarding that information.”

Florida AG Pam Bondi said she “remains involved in the settlement discussions in order to reach the best resolution for Floridians and all Americans.” She signed a joint letter with other republican AGs in 2010, saying a settlement that would involve principal reduction creates a moral hazard and lead to more strategic defaults.

 

Read more here

Share

MERS Tells Schneiderman His Lawsuit Is Garbage

Steve Dibert, MFI-Miami

Below is a press release issued by MERS in response to the lawsuit filed by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman last week naming MERS as a co-defendant for defrauding the people of the state of New York.  Naturally, like every other press release MERS publishes you have to take it with a grain of salt because their press releases tend to be as accurate and unbiased as Leni Riefenstahl’s pro-Nazi “documentary”, Triumph of the Will from 1934.

Setting the Record Straight

Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) takes its role as a mortgagee very seriously. The MERS® System is an important part of the mortgage industry and the MERS business model has been consistently validated in all 50 states. All of the activities of MERSCORP and MERS are in compliance with state and federal laws. We are confident that as people understand more about MERS and the role we play, they will see that MERS adds great value to our nation’s system of housing finance in ways that benefit not just financial institutions, the broader economy and the government, but—most of all—homeowners.

AG Schneiderman Claim #1: Defendants have improperly brought New York foreclosure proceedings in MERS’ Name

FACT: The right to bring a foreclosure action is determined by the Plaintiff’s relationship to the mortgage loan, which is whether the entity bringing the action is the holder of the note or authorized by the holder of the note to bring a foreclosure action. MERS was authorized by the note holder to bring foreclosure actions in its name, and the borrower agreed that MERS may be the entity who may foreclose on the property in the event of a default. That being said, since July 2011 MERS no longer acts as foreclosing entity. In addition, MERSCORP never received a fee or made any money on foreclosures initiated in MERS’ name.

AG Schneiderman Claim #2: MERS Certifying Officers, including defendant servicers’ employees and agents, have submitted false, deceptive and often legally invalid documents in New York foreclosure proceedings

FACT: When MERS is the mortgagee and is not the entity foreclosing, MERS executes an assignment of a mortgage that transfers all of the interests in the mortgage to the entity that is foreclosing prior to the commencement of the foreclosure. The courts have held that MERS may assign its interests, as a mortgagee, and that such assignments are valid.

AG Schneiderman Claim #3: The use of MERS certifying officers by defendants has confused and deceived homeowners and the courts.

FACT: It is perfectly proper for MERS, as the mortgagee, in order to fulfill certain acts required of the mortgagee, to appoint signing officers (or agents) to act on MERS’ behalf. To act as a principal for its signing officers is not a deceptive trade practice. There is no requirement under New York law that a principal must disclose whether its agents are employed by another entity. These agents authorized to act on behalf of MERS are not employees of MERS, but employees of the loan servicers or sub-servicing companies. Signing officers are duly authorized to perform their responsibilities on behalf of MERS who is the mortgagee – in compliance with applicable laws – and to sign their own names and to use the titles “vice president” and “assistant secretary” of MERS.

AG Schneiderman Claim #4: MERS and defendant servicers through their use of MERS have concealed important information from homeowners about their property and the role that MERS plays with respect to their mortgage.

FACT: MERS does not hide ownership or undermine the integrity of land records. Any mortgage holder registered in the MERS® System can easily access information related to their mortgage on our website or through a toll-free number. Federal law provides that consumers are notified for changes in investors or servicing status. In addition, county land records were not intended to identify the servicer of a mortgage or the current note holder; they are intended to provide notice to purchasers of property that there is a lien on the property and when that lien was perfected.

Share