Dimon Vows To Fight MBS Lawsuits

Hugh Son, Bloomberg

Dimon Vows To Fight MBS SuitJamie Dimon, who’s already spent $18.5 billion cleaning up mortgages at JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM), is warning a growing list of claimants that they’re in for a fight.

Investors demanding that the biggest U.S. lender buy back soured loans or compensate them for losses on mortgage securities “face a long and difficult road,” Dimon said last week in a shareholder letter. Those lining up include holders of $95 billion of bonds represented by Gibbs & Bruns LLP, the law firm that won $8.5 billion last year from Bank of America Corp. (BAC)

“We are going to fight repurchase claims that pretend the steep decline in home prices and unprecedented market conditions had no impact on loan performance,” Dimon, chief executive officer of the New York-based lender, wrote in the April 4 letter. He’ll also oppose “securities claims brought by sophisticated investors who understood and accepted the risks.”

Dimon, who updates investors on his firm’s mortgage losses tomorrow, is seeking to contain expenses from faulty loans that have cost the industry more than $72 billion. Similar combative language didn’t work for Bank of America CEO Brian T. Moynihan, who said in 2010 the firm will engage in “hand-to-hand combat” to fend off demands before agreeing to a string of settlements.

“They were in the same businesses as everyone else,” Mark Williams, a former Federal Reserve bank examiner who teaches finance at Boston University, said of JPMorgan. “If everyone around them is basically settling, it’s hard for me to think that there’s not something there that will make them settle.”

Repurchase Costs

JPMorgan had a $3.6 billion liability for repurchases at the end of last year, the firm said in January. Losses of as much as $2 billion beyond that are “reasonably possible,” and the firm expects repurchase costs of $350 million per quarter, according to a January presentation. Lenders can be forced to repurchase a loan, called a putback, if data backing it including borrower income or home values proves incorrect.

Read more here

Share

Jamie Dimon Admits JPM Made Too Many Mistakes In Housing

JPMorgan CEO on housing: We made too many mistakes

Justin T. Hilley

jamie dimonIn a letter to shareholders JPMorgan Chief Executive Jamie Dimon admits that his bank contributed to the collapse of the American housing industry, but says that progress is being made to rectify the errors.

“We were one of the better actors in this situation — but not good enough,” Dimon says. “We made too many mistakes.”

Dimon tells shareholders that his bank participated in the disaster by originating mortgages that wouldn’t have been given a decade earlier (“and won’t be given a decade later”). When delinquencies and foreclosures grew dramatically, his bank was “ill-prepared operationally to deal with the extraordinary volume of troubled mortgages and upset borrowers.”

“Our servicing operations left a lot to be desired,” he adds. “There were too many paperwork errors, including affidavits that were improperly signed because the signers did not have personal knowledge about what was in the affidavits but, instead, relied on the company’s processes. However, the information in the affidavits was largely accurate – i.e., the borrower, in fact, was in default, we did have the mortgage and so on.”

Gearing up to deal with its problems meant overcoming the poor systems JPMorgan inherited in acquiring Bear Stearns andWashington Mutual. In addition, there
 were numerous government modification and refinancing programs and multiple changes to these programs to contend with, Dimon says, some of which involved extensive and hard-to-complete paperwork.

Dimon also points out that early on in the crisis, JPMorgan stopped dealing with mortgage brokers, some of whom, he claims, “underwrote the worst of the mortgages and probably mis-sold mortgages more than most.”

Read more here

Share

Hey JPMorgan Chase, If You Keep Calling Me, NAMBLA Is Going to Love You

Donations To NAMBLA Seem Appropriate Since Chase Has A History Of Financially Molesting People

Harasing calls from Chase

 

 

 

 

April 3, 2012

Dear Jamie Dimon,

I know you’re a busy guy like me, so I will make this letter short and to the point.

Three years ago, I did an investigation for a client who had a loan being serviced by Chase Home Finance.  I did the report and handed it to her attorney in April of 2009.  I have not spoke to this client since then.

Since that time, I have received 15 calls a week on my cell phone from JPMorgan Chase asking for this client.  I have to continually tell the person calling me that they have the wrong number for this client and to remove me from their database.  Of the hundreds of Chase customer service people I have spoke with and who appear to be calling from a far off land, nearly all of them have assured me my phone number would be removed from the file.  The removal of my name has not happened and this morning alone I have received two more calls from JPMorgan Chase asking for this client.

Since your employees that call me apparently lack a command of the English language, I am providing you with the phrase, “Quit Calling Me” in several languages that would cover nearly all of your employees:

German: Ruft mich verlassen!

Greek: κλείστε μου τηλεφωνείς (kleíste mou tilefoneís)

Spanish: Deja de llamarme!

Italian: Smettere di chiamarmi!

French: Quitter m’appeler!

Hindi: मुझे फोन छोड़ने के (mujhē phōna chōṛanē kē)

Portugese: Parar de me chamar!

Swahili: Kuacha simu mimi!

Tagalog: itigil ang pagtawag sa akin

Now your employees have no excuse to keep calling me.

Since being nice has gotten me nowhere and wasted a lot of my time, I’m going to attempt to give you some incentive and hopefully motivation to remove me from your database once and for all.

Since JPMorgan Case and the companies it has acquired have a history of financially molesting homeowners, I have decided that it would be appropriate to donate $10 cash in your name and JPMorgan Chase’s name to the pro-pedophilla group, NAMBLA, the National Man/Boy Love Association for every phone call I receive from JPMorgan Chase about this client from this day forward.

If you’re unfamiliar with NAMBLA, I have attached a link below that will enlighten you to their cause:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association.  Just be clear and fair, NAMBLA should not be confused with the North American Marlon Brando Look Alikes.

I’m sorry if this incentive to the institution you run may seem juvenile but it appears to be the only way to get JPMorgan Chase’s attention since your employees seem to love my website, www.mfi-miami.com.   I get at least 100 vists a week from JPMorgan servers.

Sincerely,

Steve Dibert

President, MFI-Miami

 

 

 

Share

Oh, Oh, Oh, Jamie’s Cryin’ Part 4

JPMorgan Chase’s Jamie Dimon: Anti-Banking Sentiment ‘A Form Of Discrimination’

Alexander Eichler, Huffington Post

jamie Dimon ready to fight

JPMorgan Chase Jamie Dimon

Jamie Dimon, the head of JPMorgan Chase, would like to make it clear that he is not that kind of banker.

“I’ve disagreed right from the beginning of this blanket blame of all banks,” Dimon said in an interview with Charlie Gasparino of the Fox Business Network Tuesday. “I don’t like that. I think that’s just a form of discrimination that should be stopped.”

Dimon, who has been CEO of JPMorgan Chase since 2005, didn’t get specific about whom he’d rather not be lumped in with. He seemed, though, to be trying to draw a distinction between his own company — which accepted a bailout from the Troubled Asset Relief Program, but is generally seen as having weathered the financial crisis better than many other major firms — and banks that needed a greater degree of government assistance during and after the meltdown.

But Dimon’s critics may not be persuaded by his argument. After all, JPMorgan Chase received $25 billion through the U.S. Treasury under TARP and at least $3 billion from the Federal Reserve in 2008 — the same year that Dimon took home about $19.7 million in salary, stock and options. Dimon’s compensation later climbed to $23 million in 2010 and 2011, as JPMorgan overtook Bank of America to become the nation’s largest bank by assets.

Pay packages on that scale are unlikely to endear Dimon to his detractors, of which he has many.The Occupy Wall Street movement has demonstrated at Dimon’s speaking events and organized marches outside JPMorgan Chase buildings. Politicians – including President Obama – have said that the lopsided concentration of wealth in America is contributing to the country’s economic woes.

Even so, when Gasparino brought up the Occupy movement, Dimon struck a diplomatic tone, discussing the protests in language that was almost identical to comments he made in November.

“There are parts I agree with and there are parts I don’t,” Dimon told Gasparino. “It is fair for the average American to say that the major institutions of America let me down. That’s true. And it is fair, generically, to say that it was predominantly Wall Street and Washington… I think once you go beyond that, and say all politicians, all banks, all bankers — that’s terrible. I don’t accept that.”

Read more here

Share