60 Minutes Digs Into The Lehman Collapse

Update: A statement from Ernst and Young: Lehman’s bankruptcy occurred in the midst of a global financial crisis triggered by dramatic increases in mortgage defaults, associated losses in mortgage and real estate portfolios, and a severe tightening of liquidity.

We firmly believe that our work met all applicable professional standards, applying the rules that existed at the time. Lehman’s demise was caused by the global financial crisis that impacted the entire financial sector, not by accounting or financial reporting issues.

It’s hard to overstate the enormity of the 2008 collapse of Lehman Brothers. It was the largest bankruptcy in history; 26,000 employees lost their jobs; millions of investors lost all or almost all of their money; and it triggered a chain reaction that produced the worst financial crisis and economic downturn in 70 years.

Yet four years later, no one at Lehman has been held responsible. Steve Kroft investigates the collapse of Lehman Brothers: what the SEC did and didn’t know about the firm’s finances, the role of a top accounting firm, and why no one at Lehman has been called to account.

The following script is from “The Case Against Lehman” which originally aired on April 22, 2012. Steve Kroft is the correspondent. James Jacoby and Michael Karzis, producers.

On September 15, 2008, Lehman Brothers, the fourth largest investment bank in the world, declared bankruptcy — sparking chaos in the financial markets and nearly bringing down the global economy. It was the largest bankruptcy in history — larger than General Motors, Washington Mutual, Enron, and Worldcom combined. The federal bankruptcy court appointed Anton Valukas, a prominent Chicago lawyer and former United States attorney to conduct an investigation to determine what happened.

Read more here

Share

Former Lehman CEO Gets Fired From Legends Securities

Fuld Says He’s Not Built For Street Life

Fox Business via NY Post

Dick FuldFormer Lehman Brothers CEO Dick Fuld, who ran one of the largest Wall Street firms before its 2008 collapse, decided to end his two-year tenure at Legend Securities amid mounting regulatory scrutiny concerning his role at the small brokerage firm, FOX Business Network reported yesterday.

The problem for Fuld centered on regulators’ continued questioning of how much business he was generating at the firm and Fuld’s inability to obtain brokerage licenses from state regulators, according to people with direct knowledge of the matter.

Anthony Fusco, the CEO of Legend Securities, would neither confirm nor deny the circumstances behind Fuld’s departure. Fuld didn’t return telephone calls or an e-mail placed through his attorney.

Fuld is one of Wall Street’s most controversial players. Known as the “gorilla” for his tough management style, he spent nearly 30 years in the business, all of them at Lehman Brothers, rising to the position of CEO as he built the firm into one of Wall Street’s largest. But Lehman’s September 2008 collapse, and his role in the firm’s demise, remains a stain on his record.

Lehman’s bankruptcy sparked the broader collapse of the US financial system. Many blame Fuld for the firm’s business model that focused on taking big risks in real estate.

Read more here

Share

Lehman Bankrutpcy: ‘Repo 105,’ Bank’s ‘Accounting Gimick,’ Was Like ‘A Drug,’ Emails Show

Ryan McCarthy, Huffington Post

The arcane “accounting gimmick” employed by Lehman Brothers as the firm failed in 2007 and 2008, was, in fact, like “a drug” propelling the bank to conceal the true nature of its financial health, according to bankruptcy documents released yesterday.

As news organizations pour through the 2,200 documents released by Anton Valukas, the examiner in charge of sifting through the most expensive bankruptcy in history, new details have surfaced about possible criminal actions among Lehman executives.

An executive referred by Lehman execs as the firm’s “balance sheet” czar –who later went on to become the firm’s COO — The New York Timesnotes, likely had knowledge of the firm’s highly creative accounting maneuvers. Here’s the NYT:

“I am very aware … it is another drug we r on,” Herbert McDale wrote in an April 2008 e-mail cited by the examiner’s report. At other times, he is described as calling for a limit to the number of Repo 105 transactions.

At the center of the controversy is a technique called “Repo 105,” under which Lehman was able to move $50 billion off of its balance sheet in the second quarter of 2008 alone, MarketWatch reports. Here’s more from Market Watch:

[Repo 105 is] essentially a type of secured loan and is booked that way in the accounts — leading to an increase in both assets and liabilities.

Lehman’s trick was to use a clause in the accounting rules to classify the deal as a sale, even though it was still obliged to repurchase the assets at a later date. That meant the assets disappeared from the balance sheet, and it could use the cash it received to temporarily pay down other liabilities…. [Repo 105] was crucial for maintaining the group’s credit rating as rating agencies and investors began to focus more on leverage and demanded lower risk.

Here’s the NYT with another seemingly incriminating email:

In a series of e-mail messages cited by the examiner, one Lehman executive writes of Repo 105: “It’s basically window-dressing.” Another responds: “I see … so it’s legally do-able but doesn’t look good when we actually do it? Does the rest of the street do it? Also is that why we have so much BS [balance sheet] to Rates Europe?” The first executive replies: “Yes, No and yes. :)

Read more here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/12/lehman-bankrutpcy-repo-10_n_496463.html

Share

Lehman Brothers’ former heads criticised for lapses

A report into the collapse of Lehman Brothers criticises senior executives and auditor Ernst & Young for serious lapses that led to the firm’s collapse.

The report says Lehman was insolvent for weeks before it went bankrupt, sparking a global financial meltdown.

It accuses management of “actionable balance sheet manipulation” and using accounting tricks to hide debts.

Ernst & Young said that its last audit of Lehman was “fairly presented” according to accounting rules.

The collapse of the 158-year-old investment bank in September 2008 was the world’s largest bankruptcy.

Wall Street, the City of London, and the US and UK governments tried to organise a rescue, fearing – rightly – that Lehman’s failure would set off a chain reaction around the globe.

Possible claims

Friday’s 2,200-page forensic analysis into what went wrong says there could be grounds for legal action against former executives.

Lawyer Anton Valukas, who led the inquiry, stops short of saying that there was systematic wrong-doing at the firm.

Read more here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8563604.stm

Share