Ally Financial expresses regret over foreclosure issues

Kerri Panchuk, Housing Wire

Mortgage servicers rushed to defend their platforms Thursday after federal regulators sent consent orders to 14 companies saying they would need to revamp their foreclosure processing procedures.

MetLife Inc. (MET: 44.21 +0.09%) said meeting all applicable decrees continues to be a focus of the company, but added that MetLife Bank services only one percent of the U.S. home mortgage market and “has not experienced the high volume of foreclosures that many servicers have experienced.”

The bank added that “MetLife Bank has never issued and does not own nontraditional mortgage products such as pay-option ARMs and subprime loans, which have the highest rate of default.”

Ally Financial Inc. (GJM: 23.80 +0.04%) said it “deeply regrets” an error uncovered in the firm’s processing of certain foreclosure affidavits, according to a statement from the lender.

The Detroit-based financial services firm made that statement after it signed a consent order from the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.instructing mortgage servicers to review and revamp foreclosure processes.

Read more here

Share

The Russian Mafia Did It! I swear.

Back in August, I posted a story about how a title company in suburban Denver claimed the Russian Mafia hacked a wire transfer for $277,000 when they were transferring funds from them to JPMorgan Chase to pay off a client’s mortgage. Now the story is in the Denver Post.  The homeowners are now on the hook for the $277,000 and have lost their house because the title company wasn’t insured.    I find this story hard to believe because all mortgage transactions are wired through the federal reserve database as dictated in the Patriot Act.  -Steve

Homeowners stuck if refinance money is stolen

David Magoya, Denver Post

Tim and Kim Canning of Parker did what tens of thousands of other Coloradans do each year: They refinanced their home, showed up at the closing, signed the papers, and that was that.

So they thought.

But the $277,000 that was to be sent from the bank that refinanced the Cannings’ home to pay off the old mortgage was stolen along its electronic journey, the target of organized cybercriminals out of Eastern Europe or perhaps Russia, according to people familiar with the case who refused to be identified because of the ongoing investigation.

What seemed an innocuous transaction got twisted into a two-year nightmare that’s all but ruined the couple’s credit, unnerved their patience and has them staring at the possible foreclosure of their dream home without ever having missed a single mortgage payment.

Worse still, what’s happening to the Cannings could happen to anyone — and it has. The Colorado Division of Insurance, which regulates the title industry, said in a report to the legislature this month that “recently there has been an uptick in reported thefts,” though it did not quantify the trend.

And the title company that handled the closing — Classic Title Agency in Aurora — isn’t insured for the theft because state law doesn’t require it, even though title companies handle billions of dollars in real estate transactions yearly.

“Sure, we can go after the title company for the money, but that’s like squeezing a turnip,” Kim Canning said. “And for the banks, $277,000 is like nickels, but for us it’s a world turned upside down.”

Classic Title’s president, Ryan Rodenbeck, did not return calls seeking comment.

Though the couple paid for a title policy as part of the refinancing process in 2009 — most consumers do this and don’t even know it doesn’t actually cover them — the bank that loaned them the funds is the one protected, not the Cannings.

When the money was stolen, the original holder of their mortgage wasn’t paid off — in this case Bank of America — so the Cannings suddenly found themselves with two mortgages on the same house.

And both banks wanted to be paid, though the Cannings thought they only had one mortgage, the new one, so that’s the one they paid.

It wasn’t long before Bank of America’s late-payment notices showed up in the mail, the telephone calls started and the foreclosure notices appeared on the front door.

“We just thought it was a paperwork problem,” Kim Canning said, having explained to Bank of America that they’d refinanced the note and the papers must be hung up in the mail. “We were getting delinquent notices and I was shredding them. That’s how clueless I was.”

Then came the news: Their money — actually it was MetLife’s money, the holder of their new mortgage — had been stolen from Classic Title’s escrow account at Chase Bank, along with nearly $1 million in the account that made up eight other real estate deals.

Read more:Homeowners stuck if refinance money is stolen – The Denver Posthttp://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_17165330?source=rss#ixzz1ByDZPfjO

Share

Fed Shoulders AIG Loan Losses of $450Million to Ease Sale to MetLife

By Hugh Son

March 11 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve Bank of New York and American International Group Inc. agreed to shoulder as much as $450 million in losses tied to the insurer’s Japan real estate bets as part of the sale of a division to MetLife Inc.

MetLife won an accord to split most declines on $1 billion in commercial mortgages included in the $15.5 billion purchase of the AIG unit, according to a MetLife regulatory filing and the company’s chief financial officer. A corporate vehicle owned by the Fed and New York-based AIG will use MetLife stock gained in the sale to pay for future real estate losses, reducing the assets left to repay taxpayers, said two people with knowledge of the arrangement.

AIG’s Japan mortgage holdings were deemed a “more troubled asset” by MetLife, which is also indemnified from losses on one of the U.K. businesses it will acquire in the purchase of American Life Insurance Co. AIG said March 8 it is divesting Alico, which operates in more than 50 countries including Japan, to pay down bailout debts on a $60 billion Fed credit line.

“You have to ask yourself, ‘does the American taxpayer have any hope of getting their money back any other way besides selling this business?’” said William Cohan, a former JPMorgan Chase & Co. banker and author of “House of Cards,” about the financial crisis. An agreement for one side to retain some risk is typical in deals “when the buyer and seller have a difference of opinion about an asset,” he said.

Read more here:  http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-11/fed-shoulders-aig-loan-losses-to-ease-sale-of-unit-to-metlife.html

Share