Fed Governor Says Fed Will Punish Mortgage Servicers

Raskin says Fed will fine mortgage servicers

Dave Clark, Reuters

Federal Reserve Governor Sarah Bloom Raskin on Saturday said the Fed must impose monetary penalties on banks who entered into an April agreement with regulators over how to fix problems in their mortgage servicing businesses.

“The Federal Reserve and other federal regulators must impose penalties for deficiencies that resulted in unsafe and unsound practices or violations of federal law,” Raskin said in remarks to the Association of American Law Schools. “The Federal Reserve believes monetary sanctions in these cases are appropriate and plans to announce monetary penalties.”

Raskin did not say when the penalties will be announced.

She said that “appropriately sized” penalties would “incentivize mortgage servicers to incorporate strong programs to comply with laws when they build their business models.”

Mortgage servicers, many of which are large banks, collect home loan payments and manage issues like foreclosures.

The servicing issue burst into public view last year when government agencies began investigating bank mortgage practices, including the use of “robo-signers” to sign hundreds of unread foreclosure documents a day.

In April, 14 mortgage servicers, including Bank of America (BAC.N) and JPMorgan Chase (JPM.N), entered into a settlement with the Fed, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the now defunct Office of Thrift Supervision on steps that have to be taken to correct and improve their servicing practices, such as providing borrowers with a single point of contact for questions.

As part of the agreement, these mortgage servicers have hired consultants to review foreclosures that took place in 2009 and 2010 to see if any were improper.

Read more here

Share

Details of Mortgage Settlement Between Banks and AGs Begin to Emerge

Massimo Calabresi, Time Magazine

Iowa AG Tom Miller

The never-ending negotiations between the 50 state attorneys general (minus a few big ones) and five major banks over penalties and standards for past, present and future mortgage servicing are finally ending, and some details are beginning to emerge from sources familiar with the deal. The big number is the $25 billion that the banks will commit to three categories of the settlement: $5 billion in cash payments, mostly to the states, $3 billion in refinancing for underwater mortgages, and $17 billion in principal reduction. Here’s the breakdown:

Of the $5 billion, $1.5 billion will go to people who have been foreclosed on and were abused in some way during the process. The claims are nearly instantaneous–”we don’t read anything, it’s check the box,” says one state AG negotiator. But the payments are also small: $1,500 to $2,000. Now, the vast majority of people who lost their homes over the last several years probably would not have been able to make their payments even if the banks had been behaving well. For them a no-questions-asked $2,000 check from the bank for the poor treatment they received in the process may be fair. On the other hand, those who were unfairly evicted may be insulted by the small amount. But no one taking the payment would be giving up any rights to bring cases against the banks for wrongful eviction or other claims they may have. The federal regulator with oversight of the issue, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, has sent out 4.5 million forms to potentially wrongfully evicted families; processing those claims will be paid for by the banks.

Around $2.75 billion of the $5 billion in cash the banks are coughing up will go to state programs for foreclosure mitigation efforts like legal aid hotlines, mediation between homeowners and banks and counseling. Some $750 million to the federal government for its foreclosure mitigation programs.

The $3 billion for refinancing underwater loans targets a limited population: only those who are current on their payments and who have been current for several months. The Obama administration has launched its own less-than-ambitious program in this regard. Mortgage refis tend to help those who need it least–particularly if they’re limited to people who are current on their payments. Refis also only reduce interest payments, not the actual value of the underlying loan.

Read more here

Share

Ocwen buys $15B in Chase mortgage servicing rights

Ocwen finacial,mortgage fraud,mortgage auditJon Prior, Housing Wire

Ocwen Financial Corp. (OCN: 12.99 -0.61%) bought the mortgage servicing rights to 82,000 subprime mortgages from JPMorgan Chase (JPM: 32.74 +0.61%) with an unpaid principal balance of $15 billion, according to a Securities and Exchange Commission filing Wednesday.

Ocwen will pay $950 million for the MSRs, of which $625 million the servicing giant will finance. The deal represents MSRs on 2% of the entire JPMorgan mortgage servicing portfolio. The transaction is expected to close Jan. 1, 2012, but it phases of it could close before then.

The Florida-based company is the largest mortgage servicer of subprime loans in the U.S.

Ocwen bought Saxon Mortgage Services from Morgan Stanley (MS: 15.86 +0.63%) in October. In June, itacquired Litton Loan Servicing from Goldman Sachs(GS: 99.50 -0.17%). And in September 2010, Ocwen purchased HomEq Servicing from Barclays Capital(BCS: 10.97 +2.43%).

Read more here

Share

Regulator defends Bank of America deal with Fannie Mae

Rick Rothacker, McClatchy Newspapers via the Kansas City Star

Bank of America Corp.’s sale of mortgage servicing rights to Fannie Mae, a transaction that spurred a congressional inquiry last week, “made sense for both companies,” the regulator of the government-controlled mortgage giant told reporters Monday.

“We are certainly concerned about ensuring that these higher-risk mortgages are adequately and appropriately serviced, and this was an arrangement that helped to realize that goal,” Edward DeMarco, acting director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, said after remarks at a mortgage conference sponsored by the N.C. Bankers Association.

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, last week called the sale a possible “back-door bailout” for the Charlotte-based bank, which is working to shed mortgage-related liabilities and meet new capital standards. Issa sent a letter to DeMarco asking him to provide documents on the transaction and to explain the agency’s decision-making process.

“Congress and the American people deserve a full explanation for what appears to be yet another bailout paid for by taxpayers benefitting businesses that made bad business decisions,” Issa said in a statement.

Fannie Mae reportedly paid $500 million for the right to service the mortgages. Bank of America has not disclosed the purchase price or the buyer.

Bank of America spokesman Dan Frahm said the bank periodically sells mortgage-servicing rights or transfers mortgage-related assets to third parties. “This is a commonly accepted, industry-wide practice that many mortgage loan servicers, including Bank of America, have engaged in for many years,” he said.

In this case, he noted, the third-party purchaser already held the exposure to possible losses on the loans. Bank of America only serviced the mortgages.
Read more here

Share