Pennsylvania Activists Want Foreclosures Stopped

Claim Paperwork Problems Are Robbing people Of Due Process

Timothy McNulty, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Pennsylvania foreclosuresHousing activists are calling on Pennsylvania banks and sheriffs to temporarily halt all home foreclosures, saying a paperwork error could save thousands of people their homes.

The state Superior Court on Jan. 30 ruled in favor of three women facing foreclosure who claimed they were not notified, as required by law, that they could have a face-to-face meeting with their mortgage holders to try to resolve outstanding payments.

The Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency issued more than 100,000 such “Act 91″ forms from 1999 through 2008 that did not contain that notification, their lawyer Michael Malakoff said.

That means they, too, could get relief from courts. Another of his pro-bono clients, Kathy Todd of Lincoln Place, was due to go through a sheriff’s sale two weeks from now before it was halted due to the decision.

“It’s a huge relief for me to know I’m not going to lose my house,” she said at a Downtown news conference called by Action United, a nonprofit advocating for low-income residents.

The community group is trying to publicize the decision by a three-member Superior Court panel so that others going through the foreclosure process are made aware of the matter, as well as lenders and sheriffs around the state.

Pending the appeal of the decision to the full Superior Court — which was filed Feb. 13 by lenders Beneficial, HSBC and J.P. Morgan Chase — the housing group says officials should put a halt on all foreclosure actions.

“Since the Superior Court has now ruled that this Act 91 letter is wrong … the foreclosures that have happened in the past are a problem and for sure no more foreclosures should go forward if that deficient letter is in people’s files,” said Maryellen Deckard, Action United’s lead Western Pennsylvania organizer.

“I think it would be a win-win for the city, the sheriff’s office and the homeowners — as well as the banks — to stop the process until the law becomes settled,” Mr. Malakoff said.

In a separate interview, Allegheny County Sheriff William Mullen said his office has been following the legal wrangling but has no plans to halt foreclosure actions until court rulings are final.

If the courts continue to rule the Act 91 letters were deficient “there will be a lot of cleanup work to do. There are a lot of things to look at before we make the final call,” he said.

The sheriff launched a mortgage conciliation initiative

Read more here

Share

Robo-signing Causes 100k Backlog of Foreclosures In NJ

NJ Has Backlog of Up to 100K Foreclosures

Stacie Servetah, Bloomberg

New Jersey must work through a backlog of 50,000 to 100,000 unprocessed foreclosures because of delays caused by an investigation into how lenders handled the filings, said Richard Constable, acting commissioner of the state Community Affairs Department.

Foreclosures slowed to about 10,000 last year from 50,000 in 2010 and 150,000 two years ago after claims of “robo- signing” — unverified documents sped through the system — spurred an investigation by state attorneys general at the end of 2010, Constable said today at a meeting of mayors in the Statehouse in Trenton.

As many as 100,000 properties will soon come to market in New Jersey as banks resume processing foreclosure sales, Constable said. The state will work with towns to make sure that the foreclosures don’t blight neighborhoods, he said.

New Jersey has the second-highest inventory of homes in foreclosure after Florida, with 6.4 percent of all dwellings with a mortgage in the process, according to data released today by CoreLogic Inc., a Santa Ana, California-based data real estate information company. Nationally, 1.4 million homes, or 3.4 percent of those with a mortgage, were in foreclosure as of December.

Read more here

Share

NJ Lawmaker Has Unique Foreclosure Plan

Rescuing N.J. foreclosures: Lawmaker has proposal with potential

Star-Ledger Editorial

New Jersey Foreclosure PlanForeclosures proliferated like so many mushrooms in the wake of the housing and mortgage collapse. About 150,000 houses are in some stage of the foreclosure process in New Jersey. Vacant and boarded up, these houses are a blight on their neighborhoods, an invitation to vandalism and crime, and a drag on property values. Families evicted from those houses still need affordable places to live.

Meanwhile, towns across the state are sitting on nearly $300 million in housing trust fund dollars, accumulated from private developer fees. Many towns choose to do nothing because of uncertainty over affordable housing regulations, in flux since 2004. Others have been hostile to building anything.

Sen. Raymond Lesniak (D-Union) has an idea that ties those elements together and makes a lot of sense. He will introduce a bill this week to create a Foreclosure Relief Corp. within the state’s housing and mortgage finance agency. The new entity would use those socked-away trust fund dollars to buy foreclosed houses, which would then be converted to low- and moderate-income housing. Towns would get credit toward affordable housing obligations. Lenders who participate would get credit under the Community Reinvestment Act, which promotes investment in cash-starved communities. Lesniak predicts his plan could create as many as 30,000 new affordable homes in New Jersey.

Read more here

Share

Future of foreclosures in N.J. hinges on state Supreme Court decision

Sarah Portlock, Star-Ledger

florida foreclosures,mortgage fraud,mortgage audit,florida mortgage timelineIn the nearly five months since the state Supreme Court effectively allowed six of the country’s biggest banks to begin filing foreclosures again, attorneys and court officials have been expecting a flood of new filings to hit the courts.

Except it hasn’t happened. Foreclosure filings are down 83 percent as of October this year, compared with the same time period last year, according to court figures, and there are at least 100,000 cases either pending in the system or waiting to be submitted.

Attorneys involved in the work in New Jersey point to at least one reason for the significant delay: a court case that has reached the state Supreme Court, with oral arguments on Wednesday.

The case, US Bank National Association v. Guillaume, is important because the court is asked to determine who must be named as a point of contact on the document that initiates the foreclosure process, known as the Notice of Intent to Foreclose. The state Fair Foreclosure Act requires identifying the lender and its contact information. But because the original lender has often bundled and sold the loans to investors, the current lender lists the servicer, a third party that collects monthly payments and dispurses it to the mortgage holder. In this situation, the lender’s attorney argued it was unnecessary to name his client on the notice because the servicer had been assigned the mortgage rights.

Attorneys for the homeowners, Maryse and Emilio Guillaume, said listing the servicer is not sufficient, should the homeowner want to work out a solution and stay in the house, and any foreclosure judgment without the lender having been named should be voided.

Read more here

Share