Does R-I-C-O Spell Relief For BofA Homeowners?

Joel Sucher, American Banker

While shareholders queue up for a seat at the annual Bank of America extravaganza on Wednesday and the forces of Occupy get ready to mount major protests, a small group of lawyers plots its own campaign to take on what they call the “predatory mortgage banking cartel.”

They are pained at the lack of real regulatory enforcement actions in the wake of the financial meltdown, and angry about how easy it’s been for the megabanks – B of A, in particular – to “get over” on the American public, continuing a pattern of foreclosure behavior despite tongue-lashings by the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Housing and Urban Development.

So, how do they spell relief for this fraud-induced indigestion? R-I-C-O.

Yes, RICO, that iconic legal strategy developed in the 1970s – one with teeth – that spelled calamity for the bosses of the Genovese and Gambino crime families, restored some semblance of order to mob-run Teamster Local 560 in New Jersey, and sent the immensely popular mayor of Providence Rhode Island, Vincent “Buddy” Cianci, to the can for running his office as a financially self-serving criminal enterprise. But the case that took it beyond the boundaries of common thugdom was RICO’s successful prosecution of Wall Street junk bond peddler, Michael Milken. While controversial, the case emphasized the expansive nature of the statute in pursuing corporate crime, and the fact that RICO provides for both criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for financial damages, has this group of attorneys intrigued.

So, how might B of A qualify as a likely target? It’s definitely an “enterprise,” one of the criteria of a RICO prosecution. According to several lawyers, there’s a pattern of activities, mainly surrounding B of A’s 2008 acquisition of Angelo Mozilo’s Frankenstein, a/k/a Countrywide Financial, that provide potential prosecutorial fodder insofar as securities fraud and consumer protection violations are concerned.

Read more here

Share

Goldman Sachs fined $22 million over ‘huddles’

Ronald D. Orol, MarketWatch

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. settled charges with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday, agreeing to pay a $22 million fine over allegations that the Wall Street bank didn’t have policies to prevent analysts from sharing nonpublic information with the firm’s traders.

The exchanges took place in weekly “huddles,” where Goldman’s research analysts met to provide “their best trading ideas” to the firm’s traders and later passed them on to a select group of “top clients,” the SEC said.

“Despite being on notice from the SEC about the importance of such controls, Goldman GS -3.75%  failed to implement policies and procedures that adequately controlled the risk that research analysts could preview upcoming ratings changes with select traders and clients,” said Robert Khuzami, the SEC’s director of enforcement.

The agency said the “huddles” practice took place between 2006 and 2011, and involved sales personnel. At the meetings, analysts discussed short-term trading ideas and traders discussed their views on the markets.

In 2007, according to the SEC, the New York-based investment bank began a program known as the “Asymmetric Service Initiative,” where analysts shared information and trading ideas from meetings with some investor clients.

The SEC noted that in 2003 Goldman paid a $5 million penalty to settle charges that, among other violations, it failed to set up and enforce written policies to misuse material nonpublic information obtained from outside consultants about 30-year U.S. Treasury bonds. Goldman settled the proceeding without admitting or denying the findings.

Read more here

Share

Flagstar Goes Under The Microscope Again

This Time For Securities Fraud

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential securities fraud at Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. (“Flagstar” or the “Company”) (NYSE: FBC).

(Logo:http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20120119/MM38856LOGO )

The investigation is focused on allegations made in a complaint filed February 24, 2012 by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) in the United States District Court for the Southern District ofNew York. DOJ alleges that for more than a decade, Flagstar had been improperly approving thousands of residential home mortgage loans for government insurance.

The same day that the DOJ complaint was filed, Flagstar agreed to a settlement whereby the Company would pay $15 million within 30 days after court approval of the settlement, and would make additional payments totaling an additional $117.8 million as soon as Flagstar meets certain financial benchmarks. The Company also agreed that it would repay $266.7 million that Flagstar received as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program.

The investigation focuses on whether the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by failing to disclose that: (1) since January 2002 Flagstar routinely delegated key underwriting functions to staff employees who were not experienced underwriters; (2) Company underwriters falsely certified that they had themselves reviewed all of the loan documents and had exercised due diligence; (3) Flagstar’s underwriters repeatedly endorsed ineligible loans for FHA insurance but falsely certified to the Department of Housing and Urban Development that the loans were eligible for such insurance; and (4) Flagstar set daily quotas for its underwriters and paid these employees substantial incentive awards for exceeding their daily quotas.

Request more information now by clicking here: www.faruqilaw.com/FBC

Take Action
If you purchased Flagstar securities and would like to discuss your legal rights, visitwww.faruqilaw.com/FBC. You can also contact us by calling Richard Gonnello or Francis McConville toll free at 877-247-4292 or at 212-983-9330 or by sending an e-mail to rgonnello@faruqilaw.com orfmcconville@faruqilaw.com. Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Flagstar’s conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential matter.

FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP
369 Lexington Avenue, 10th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Attn:  Richard Gonnello, Esq.
rgonnello@faruqilaw.com
Francis McConville, Esq.
fmcconville@faruqilaw.com
Telephone: (877) 247-4292 or (212) 983-9330

SOURCE Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP

Share

Will banksters get away with it?

Danny Schechter, Al-Jazeera

Hats off to Matt Taibbi for staying on the Wall Street crime beat, asking in his most recent report in Rolling Stone: “Why Isn’t Wall Street in Jail?”

“Financial crooks,” he argues, “brought down the world’s economy — but the feds are doing more to protect them than to prosecute them.”

True enough, but that’s only part of the story. The Daily Kos called his investigation a “depressing read” perhaps because it suggests that the Obama Administration is not doing what it should to reign in financial crime. Many of the lawyers he calls on to act come from big corporate law firms and buy into their worldview.

Kos should be more depressed by the failure of the progressive community to focus on these issues, and not pressing the government to do the right thing.

There is much more to this story. It’s also more about institutions than individuals, more about a captured system that enables and covers up crime and, then, deflects attention away from the deeper problem.

Ten problems

You could see that when television host Bill Maher pressed Taibbi to name the biggest Wall Street crooks, on his weekly political comedy show, he didn’t fully understand what we are really up against.

Here are ten of well-planned but flawed factors that help explain the procrastination and rationalisation for inaction. The government is not just to blame either. Several industries working together, through their firms associations, and well-paid operatives, collaborated over years to financialise the economy to their own benefit.

Personalising bad guys makes for good TV without offering a real explanation.

When financial institutions and services became the dominant economic sector, they, effectively, took over the political system to fortify their power. It was a done incrementally, over years, with savvy, foresight and malice.

First, many of those who might be charged with financial crimes and fraud invested in lobbying and political donations to insure that tough regulations and enforcement were neutered before the housing bubble they promoted took off.

After hundreds of bankers were jailed in the wake of the Savings and Loan crisis, financial fraudsters pushed for weakened regulations, guaranteeing that their colleagues wouldn’t be jailed in when the next crisis hit.

In effect, their deregulation strategy also deliberately ”decriminalised” the environment to make sure that practices that led to high profits and low accountability would be permissible and permitted. What was once illegal soon became “legal”.

No enforcement

The cops and watchdogs were taken off the beat. Anticipating and then dissolving restraints, they engineered a low-risk crime scene in the way the Pentagon systematically prepares its battlefields. This permitted illicit practices, to be encouraged by CEOs in a variety of control frauds to keep profits up so that the executives could extract more revenue.

Today’s proposed Republican cutbacks of the funding of regulatory bodies aims to undercut recently passed financial reforms. One Commissioner of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission said if the budget is slashed, “there would essentially be no cop on the beat…we could once again risk another calamitous disintegration.” He added, according to a New York Times report, “the process will mean nothing, squat, diddley … if we get cut we’re going to be in a world of hurt.”

Read more here

Share