Ex-lawyer charged in $143G swindle

James Tinley, New Haven Register

A former city lawyer has been arrested in the theft of more than $143,000 while handling the refinancing of a client’s home mortgage in 2007.

Morris I. Olmer, 81, of Belleveue Road, was arraigned at Superior Court on a single count of first-degree larceny.

He is accused of pocketing $143,530.35 instead of paying off the original lender when a Hamden client refinanced a mortgage, according to the arrest warrant affidavit.

Olmer’s client was then on the verge of foreclosure when the mortgage was paid off by the Client Security Fund. All practicing lawyers pay into the state fund to aid victims of attorney misconduct.

Olmer, a former city alderman who had practiced law for more than 50 years, had his law license suspended for six months in February 2007 in an unrelated mortgage scheme. He resigned as a member of the Connecticut bar in July 2008, according to state judicial records.

Olmer is accused of swindling his client in January 2007.

Bank records show Olmer cashed checks from the misappropriated money for personal expenses, to run his law office and even to give his secretary a $5,000 car loan. She paid back $2,325, according to the arrest document.

The criminal charge came when two complaints were filed with the Statewide Grievance Committee by the owner of the Hamden home and another client. Those complaints were forwarded to the office of the chief state’s attorney for prosecution.

http://www.nhregister.com/articles/2010/02/27/news/new_haven/a1_–_bad_lawyer_0227.txt

Share

Bogus foreclosure claim not isolated

Tom Lyons, Sarasota Herald-Tribune

The way a Sarasota man almost lost his home after bogus claims by out-of-town foreclosure attorneys made a good front-page story.

But some aspects of William Berta’s story are not all that unusual.

It may be rare that Berta got a judge to overturn a foreclosure sale on his Sarasota homestead by asserting he was never served with foreclosure papers. As you may have read in Monday’s Herald-Tribune, the foreclosure attorney claimed Berta could not be found and therefore his house was abandoned. That despite the fact Berta is a local business owner who was easily findable.

Still, if that were an isolated glitch, I might not be doing a column. But there’s much evidence, as the Florida Bar has confirmed, that some bulk-rate foreclosure firms are seriously cutting corners. And why not?

They can usually file sloppy documents with unverified and false claims and get away with it, because most foreclosures are not contested. Usually, nobody even skims through the documents.

A recent court ruling says judges don’t need to. The checking is up to homeowners.

That has led to filings so ridiculous that I thought anti-foreclosure lawyer April Charney was kidding when she e-mailed a recent find from Lee County. It is a template, a fill-in-the-blanks foreclosure document, that foreclosure-mill lawyers filed in court as a real one, with almost nothing filled in.

Read more here: http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20100223/COLUMNIST/2231020/-1/NEWSSITEMAP?p=all&tc=pgall

Share