Federal Judge Upholds MFI-Miami Discovery of Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Tax Dodging Scheme

Steve Dibert, MFI-Miami

On Friday, March 23, 2012, Judge Victoria Roberts of the United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan upheld discoveries by MFI-Miami made public last year stating that the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) were misleading the state of Michigan and the County Register of Deeds offices across Michigan by claiming state tax exemptions reserved for government agencies on foreclosure sales in the state of Michigan

In Oakland County, Et Al v. Federal Housing Finance Agency, Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Case No. 11-12666), Judge Roberts re-affirmed the September 2011 U.S. District Court of Nevada ruling determining Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were not government agencies. She cited, Nevada v. Countrywide Home Loans, 812 F.Supp 2d 1211, 1216-18 (D.Vev. September 16, 2011).

Judge Roberts ruled that a transfer tax is an excise tax and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are not exempt from federal excise taxes and that they are required to pay the Michigan Transfer Tax when they transfer the ownership of a property out of their name.

The arguments used by Oakland County came from several investigations conducted by MFI-Miami in 2010 and in the spring of 2011. MFI-Miami estimates that since 1998, nearly $1.2 billion has been lost due to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the banks claiming this exemption on both state and county level.

In May 2011, MFI-Miami’s findings were presented in detail to the Michigan Association of Register of Deeds (MARD) by MFI-Miami President, Steve Dibert and Michigan Attorney William Maxwell (P35846).  In addition, the presentation to MARD detailed how banks and mortgage servicers were also claiming these exemptions on properties transferred from them to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

“The money owed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to the counties and the state only accounts for about 20-25% of the tax revenue owed,” explained MFI-Miami President Steve Dibert, “The rest is owed by the banks who also took the exemption.” 

Ingham County Register of Deeds, Curtis Hertel, Jr. has also filed suit. Hertel v. Bank America N.A., Et al (Case No. 11-687-C2).  This case more closely resembles litigation envisioned in the presentation to MARD given by Attorney Maxwell and Steve Dibert because it specifically names the banks and the foreclosure mills namely Trott & Trott and Orlans Associates.

“Naming the foreclosure mills as defendants was important because they were the ones responsible for filing the paperwork with counties on behalf of their mortgage servicer clients,” explained Steve Dibert, “As attorneys, they should have known better.” 

Also see:

Michigan Politicians Turn Blind Eye To Illegal Fannie & Freddie Foreclosures Performed By Trott & Orlans

Did Two Prominent Michigan Democrats Throw Michigan Kids Under The Bus?

 

Share

Michigan Politicians Turn Blind Eye To Illegal Fannie & Freddie Foreclosures Performed By Trott & Orlans

Attorneys Need To Name Them As Co-Defendants In Foreclosure Lawsuits

Steve Dibert, MFI-Miami

Over the past year, I’ve been writing about the shenanigans going on over at Michigan’s largest foreclosure mills, Trott & Trott and Orlans Associates in regards to robo-signing and notary fraud.  MFI-Miami has now discovered something that calls into question the legitimacy of every Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac foreclosure they have performed in the state of Michigan over the past five years.

You would think that with nearly 50 years of foreclosure and real estate law under their belts, both Linda Orlans and David Trott would know that how they conduct foreclosures on behalf of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac appears to be illegal under Michigan law but then again, these are the same two law firms who have essentially written a foreclosure version of the Kama Sutra with the number of documents they have filed with Register of Deeds offices across Michigan containing the fraudulent signatures of Marshall Isaacs, Ellen Coon, Marcy Ford, and Kenneth Kurel.   Also, we shouldn’t forget the nearly $1.2 Billion in Michigan Real Estate Transfer Taxes they allegedly helped their clients defraud from Michigan school children by claiming Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are government agencies.

The Con

“White collar crime is more brutal than violent crime. The actions of one or a few corrupt public officials and corrupt businessmen affect the livelihoods of thousands of people. Treat them with the same disdain as we do treat serial killers because white collar criminals are economic predators.”    -Sam Antar

Foreclosure mill

A Foreclosure Mill lobbyist swooning a naive member of the Michigan Legislature

So how are two of the largest foreclosure mills in Michigan pulling off this never ending heist with an estimated value in the tens of millions of dollars a year?  More importantly, how are they doing it right under the noses of lawmakers and the public?

It’s simple, they use one of the oldest tricks in the book, vanity and they play both the public and Michigan politicians for suckers.    They fit the profile of a white collar criminal as former Ponzi Scheme Operator now whistleblower, Sam Antar describes in his blog, “White collar criminals use a combination of charm and deceit to achieve their objectives.” 

The foreclosure mills also bet on the fact that most people in Michigan won’t fight their foreclosures due of the cost involved with Michigan being a non-judicial foreclosure state.  Therefore, no one will notice what they were doing.

Both David Trott and Linda Orlans also took advantage of the political climate in Michigan.   One of the side affects of Michigan’s harsh term limit law  which caps House members to 3 2-year terms and  2 4-year terms for members of the Senate, is that every eight years all institutional memory is wiped clean.  This means there are no experience legislators who understand how to draft legislation.   So these elected officials turn to lobbyists.  That’s right, Lobbyists actually write the legislation for members of the Michigan Legislature and as David Trott has proven in the past, he is all to volunteer.

David Trott, Linda Orlans and to a lesser extent, Randall Miller, (whose sister coincidentally is Democratic State Representative Lisa Brown), have figured out how to influence decadent judges and the simple minded politicians of Michigan who are ignorant of the complexities of mortgage finance with “friendly visits”,campaign cash and trips.  Both Linda Orlans, David Trott and the attorneys in their firm have given over $100,000 to the Michigan Republican Party,  Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette and Michigan Secretary of State Ruth Johnson. Last October, Ruth Johnson raised an estimated $50,000 at a fund raiser at Linda Orlans’ home after being informed of the notary fraud being perpetrated at Lind Orlans’ law firm.

Here’s a perfect example of the ignorance of the political leadership in the Michigan Legislature on the financial crisis.  Last May,  Republican House Banking Chair, Marty Knollenberg stated at public hearing with a MERS representative that he had no idea who or what MERS was.

Joe DiSano, a political consultant with Main Street Strategies in Lansing, Michigan puts it this way,

“In the post-term limit world, lawmakers are spoon fed  legislation by lobbyists.  The lobbyists write the legislation and even write the talking points for the legislators to sell the legislation to the public.

 The majority of State Senators and State Representatives in Lansing are morons with no clue to the damage they are doing.  Most of them have no idea they are getting played by lobbyists and special interests. What’s even more dangerous are the dozens who don’t care they are being manipulated.  

Many of these elected officials actually think lobbyists are their friends.”  

Here’s how these law firms conspire with the mortgage servicers who hire them to steal people’s homes.  First, there is a misconception that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac hire these law firms to perform the foreclosures, they do not, the servicer hires them.  However, they do approve which law firms the servicer can retain.   As soon as the homeowner closes on his or her mortgage, the mortgage is recorded in the office of county Register of Deeds generally with MERS being named on the mortgage as the lender’s nominee.  The note is then sold to a Fannie Mae or a Freddie Mac investor off the books depending on which agency is insuring the debt.   The mortgage then stays in the name of the originating lender on record with the county Register of Deeds.

Once the mortgage servicer is ready to initiate the foreclosure,  the note is then temporarily assigned to the mortgage servicer from Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac because Faannie Mae and Freddie Mac guidelines forbid Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from foreclosing in their own names.  Again, the assignment from Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac is done off the books with the mortgage being assigned from MERS to the current mortgage servicer showing MERS as the original mortgagee.

Here are two different assignments on Fannie Mae files MFI-Miami has worked on.  One is allegedly signed by celebrity robo-signer Marshall Isaacs of Orlans Associates assigning the mortgage from MERS to GMAC Mortgage so GMAC could initiate a foreclosure.  The original mortgagee on this particular file was actually Quicken Loans.  The other assignment is done by lessor known robo-signer Marcy Ford of Trott & Trott. This assignment shows the assignment being assigned to BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP from MERS.  The original mortgagee on this file was also Quicken Loans.  Notice there is no mention of Fannie Mae’s name anywhere on either one of these assignments.

Fannie Mae Article Scans

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guidelines specifically say that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are the owners of the respective notes regardless if it’s in their respective portfolio or not.  Unlike most Mortgage Backed Securities which have separate Trustees and Insurance Providers, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac act fulfills both responsibilities.  Therefore, both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac contend that if they insure it, they are considered the owner.

As you can see below, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac specifically instructs the servicer’s attorney to assign  the mortgage into the name of the servicer.  Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guidelines specifically say that the mortgage is to be assigned into the servicer’s name and that both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will assign “Temporary Ownership” of the note to the servicer.

On May 23, 2008 Fannie Mae published Fannie Mae Announcement 8-12, reaffirming Fannie Mae’s policy.

Fannie Mae Note Holder Notice 2008

Freddie Mac has a similar policy as stated in Freddie Mac Guideline 66.17:

The Servicer must instruct the foreclosure counsel or trustee to process the foreclosure in the Servicer’s name.

If an assignment of the Security Instrument to Freddie Mac has been recorded, then the Security Instrument must be assigned back to the Servicer before the foreclosure counsel or trustee files the first legal action. Refer to Section 66.18 for an explanation of first legal action.

To have the Security Instrument assigned back to the Servicer, the Servicer must submit a completed assignment with Form 105, Multipurpose Loan Servicing Transmittal, to Freddie Mac (see Directory 9). Freddie Mac will execute the assignment and return it to the Servicer within seven Business Days of receiving the documents.

If the Servicer is foreclosing on a Mortgage registered with the Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. (MERS), the Servicer must prepare an assignment of the Security Instrument from MERS to the Servicer and instruct the foreclosure counsel or trustee to foreclose in the Servicer’s name and take title in Freddie Mac’s name according to the requirements of Section 66.54. The Servicer must record the prepared assignment where required by State law. State mandated recordings are non-reimbursable by Freddie Mac, are not considered part of the Freddie Mac allowable attorney fees and must not be billed to the Borrower.

At the Sheriff’s Sale, an Affidavit of Purchaser and the Sheriff’s Deed is recorded showing Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac purchasing the mortgage from the Mortgage Servicer for the outstanding balance of the mortgage.  Below is an example of a what one looks like and again this is the handiwork of celebrity Robo-signer Marshall Isaacs and yes, he claims all three of the signatures on this foreclosure sale are his.

Fannie Mae Article Scans2

In this case, neither the Livingston County Register of Deeds or the Livingston County Treasurer have any record of a check in the amount of $444,446.97 to Livingston County or any record of this amount being exchanged between GMAC Mortgage and Fannie Mae.

Show Me The Money

Show me the money

The first time I heard an attorney argue my, “Show me the money!”  argument to a judge at a Fannie Mae eviction hearing I almost crapped my pants.  The homeowner’s attorney started channeling his inner Jerry Maguire and actually said, “Show me the money!” and repeated it.  The Northern Michigan judge, who was presiding over the case, almost began shouting it with him as the attorney from Orlans Associates looked like one of those people after they had their heart pulled from their chest by Mola Ram in Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom.

“You have to understand why things work on a starship.”-Admiral James  T. Kirk

Here’s why “Show me the money!” is important but before you can use it you need to understand how mortgage lending works and how foreclosures work in Michigan.  You need to remember, if the foreclosure mill is unable to show a transaction took place between Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac and the Servicer who is foreclosing as an owner the debt reverts back to the foreclosing party. So if Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac didn’t pay as stated on the Sheriff’s Deed, that means…? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? It means Fannie Mae  or Freddie Mac has been the holder of both the mortgage and the note all long.  

Foreclosure mills will respond to this argument by saying, “Our client is the servicer and under Michigan law, we can foreclose as a servicer.”

Everything the attorney for the foreclosure mill is arguing may be true but in foreclosure mill fashion, he’s leaving out one key detail, their client isn’t foreclosing as a servicer, they’re foreclosing as an owner of the debt.  There is a  huge difference between being the mortgage servicer and the mortgagee and this is where an understanding how the system works comes into play.

If the servicer is foreclosing as the servicer, the advertisements prior to Sheriff’s sale and the Sheriff’s Deed have to reflect they are the servicer by saying, “BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP, GMAC Mortgage or whomever the servicer is, on behalf of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac” and that would comply with Michigan law but they are not doing it that way.

As the alleged owner of the debt, the servicer/acting mortgagee is required to show a chain of ownership of the mortgage as stipulated in MCL 600.3204(3), the Michigan statute the governs how foreclosures in Michigan are conducted.  Michigan law assumes the the mortgagee and the note holder are one in the same because as any title attorney will tell you, you can’t separate the mortgage and the note:

“If the party foreclosing a mortgage by advertisement is not the original mortgagee, a record chain of title shall exist prior to the date of sale under section 3216 evidencing the assignment of the mortgage to the party foreclosing the mortgage.”

The foreclosure mills wants to give the appearance of complying with this statute by assigning the mortgage to the servicer from MERS and by stating that MERS is the original mortgagee in the mortgage assignment.  However, they never once record or disclose that Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac had an ownership interest.  They are essentially blurring the line of who actually has the legal authority to foreclose.

Attorney Jason Jenkinson of the Northern Michigan Law Center puts it this way,

“I believe that the banks involved, as well as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, have purposely blurred the lines between the note owners, note holders, mortgage servicers, and every other player involved in the process in order to foreclose on Americans as quickly as possible.”

What most people don’t realize is that foreclosure mills are more like car dealerships than they are law firms because they make their money on the volume of cases they close not the cases they litigate.  Matter of fact, they lose money on cases they are forced to litigate because they low ball their legal fees to mortgage servicers.  This is why I always encourage my clients to fight their foreclosures especially if they live in the northern two-thirds of the state.

In their mad rush for profit and pushing cases out the door, foreclosure mills like Orlans and Trott & Trott violated one of the basic rules of mortgage lending that they teach you in Mortgage 101.  You can’t separate the mortgage and the note.

For those of you who may not know this, a note is a contract whereby a party makes a promise to pay a sum of money to another party under specific terms. The note has virtually nothing to do with the property itself and mortgage is the document that attaches the note to the property in a form of a lien. remember a mortgage in and of itself is NOT a promise to pay but it does give the lender the right to take the property if the borrower goes into default and doesn’t pay under the terms of the note.

As they prepare to foreclose, the foreclosure mills as the attorneys for the mortgage servicers attempt to re-join the mortgage and the note.  This where it begins to get complicated to the point that it becomes almost impossible to do.  Most Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans during the boom years were written by corespondent lenders and lenders who are no longer in business.

What are Corespondent Lenders? Correspondent Lenders are essentially mortgage brokers who are able to close a loan using their name as the lender.   They generally have a line of credit with a major lender to help fund the loan and were allowed to hide certain fees including Yield Spread Premiums.  These mortgages were generally recorded in the county Register of Deeds with the Correspondent Lender named as the mortgagee with MERS listed as their nominee.  The problem is that within a 24 month period after the market collapsed in 2007, nearly 95% of the Correspondent Lenders in Michigan closed their doors.  When this happened, MERS lost all rights to act as their nominee.

 ”Show Me The Money!” scares foreclosure mills like Trott & Trott and Orlans Associates because it exposes them to major legal liability since they not only represent both the servicer and Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, they also filed the paperwork.

As soon as it is proven that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has been an owner of the mortgage and the note from origination through the Sheriff’s sale, the mortgage assignments assigning the mortgage from MERS to the mortgage servicer giving the servicer ownership would be considered fraudulent because Michigan law assumes mortgagee is also the holder of the note.  As are the affidavits associated with the Sheriff’s sale.

In the event a judge determines that the mortgage and note were separated and not re-attached properly, he or she could rule that the only party with authority to foreclose would be the originating lender.  There is a 75% chance the originating lender was decimated in the chaos of the financial apocalypse.  This then opens the door for the homeowner to make  to make a strong argument for a quiet title action.

 This Organization Does Not Tolerate Failure

The cool thing about this weekend being a long weekend for people who work in finance is I get to watch the really good James Bond movies with Sean Connery.   While watching “You Only Live Twice” on BBC America, I realized that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac treat the attorneys for their servicers like Ernst Blofeld treats his SPECTRE agents.  When they succeed, they get to live.  When they fail, they get eliminated.   Don’t believe me? Ask Steven Baum, Marc Ben-Ezra or David Stern.

David Trott and Linda Orlans are not too big to be brought down.  They may believe they are invincible but with more and more judges siding with homeowners in foreclosure cases and the multiple class action lawsuits being brought because of their clients’ failure to pay the Michigan Real Estate Transfer Tax, David Trott and Linda Orlans are allowing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to keep getting punched in the jaw.  It’s only a matter of time before Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac decides to put them in the tank filled with the man-eating mutant piranha.

 

 

 

Share

How To Make Mandelman’s Head Spin Around Like Linda Blair

Mandelman Says I Grilled Him Too Hard On One OF His Doer Calls To Action

A couple of weeks ago, I was in Colorado on what was supposed to be a vacation but soon turned into a business trip.  When people find out I’m traveling to a specific city, my phone starts ringing.  It’s usually lawyers who need my help on files and want to meet in person.  So two days into the trip, I decided to just go into work mode and make money while I’m there.  The only time I took off was on Saturday to go see the Rocky Mountain Roller Girls, a roller derby team I’m thinking of sponsoring.

So while I’m watching these ladies elbow each other, I get a call about a woman in Massachusetts that Martin Andelman was trying to help.  So Sunday I call Martin and ask him a bunch of questions about the foreclosure and where it stands.  Naturally, Martin has no clue what I’m talking about and I could tell his head was spinning like Linda Blair in the movie, The Exorcist.   However, to Martin’s credit he’s journalist with a communications background not a mortgage or foreclosure background.  Next time I’m in LA, I will have to stop and give him a Mortgage 101 class.

It all worked out though because One West agreed to give Lisa Ferrecchia who is a Thalidomide Baby a loan modification that would keep her in her house permanently with out the need for me to call One West.  My conversation with Martin must have made an impression because he blogged about it when he wrote about Lisa getting her loan mod from One West.  Here is the blog below:

OneWest Bank DOES IT for Lisa in Massachusetts! 

It all started early last Saturday morning when I got a call about a homeowner in Massachusetts scheduled to lose her home to foreclosure sale in just two days…

Now, I don’t mind telling you that I had just posted a DOERS ALERT the day before, and to be honest they’re all a lot of work and I really didn’t want to have to write another one the very next day… I was exhausted and looking forward to sleeping for the next couple days.

The client’s name was Lisa Ferrecchia, who I was told was one of the thalidomide babies. At the time, I did’t know if that meant she was part of a sister singing trio… you know… The Thalidomide Babies,” or what, but I’d soon find out.

So, I read about thalidomide and OneWest Bank most of the day and then started writing a DOER ALERT, which was finally ready to post at about 5:30 PM on Sunday afternoon.  I was beyond tired and feeling kind of awful, if you must know.  I hadn’t been outside of my study for yet another weekend straight… my wife wasn’t saying anything, and my daughter was saying she missed me.  But what could I do?  I mean, seriously?  Lisa Ferrecchia’s home was to be sold the very next day at 3:00 PM in Massachusetts.

Plus, in Massachusetts, do you know how they do it?  They auction the home off right on the soon to be ex-homeowner’s front lawn, for all to see.  I’ll tell you what… that is some 17th century nonsense right there.  As in… Me thinketh she is a witch!  Aye, a witch!  Might as well be making the homeowner walk around with a scarlet ‘F’ on his or her clothing.  I figured that Lisa had probably spent a lifetime seeing people stare at her, and the thought of her home being auctioned off in front of her neighbors… well… that just was not going to happen.  Not today.

I had spoken to attorney Glenn Russell early on Saturday, and told him to have a skeletal bankruptcy filing ready just in case.  I had just spent the whole weekend behind closed doors in my study typing and posting at 5:35 PM on Sunday, I wasn’t at all sure my DOERS would DO it in time… or even could DO it in time.  And if that was the case… why the heck did I just blow the whole weekend with my family… again.  I was conflicted and unsure of everything.

To make matters even worse…  and I wouldn’t normally share this publicly… but Steve Dibert of MFI Miami called me on Sunday evening… he was in Denver for something foreclosure-related.  He had read my DOER ALERT post and asked me what I was doing about Lisa Ferrecchia.  I said I posted a DOER ALERT and my DOERS would handle it.  He asked if I had called Glenn Russell and if Glenn was going to file a TRO, etc. etc. to stop the next day’s sale. He asked a bunch of other technical legal questions until I had a headache.

I said there wasn’t time for any of that, but my DOERS would handle it.  He wasn’t buying any of it.  I said, don’t worry… I’m sure it’ll be fine.

And he replied: “Dude, I think your nuts.  I’ll call Glenn and find out  what else can be done.”  He hung up.

“Oh, ye-of-little-faith-shithead,” I thought to myself.  

We all know what happened next, right?  OneWest Bank’s CEO emailed me late on Sunday night saying that he’d look into the situation the next morning… and the next morning OneWest contacted Lisa… told her that the sale had already been postponed… and that they’d do everything they could to get her a loan modification that would allow her to keep her home.  I wrote to tell everyone the good news, and said that I was certain that OneWest Bank would do exactly what they had promised.  Of course, not everyone was sure whether I was kidding… I was right… or I was a fruit loop.

One West said that they would let Lisa know by today… Tuesday, February 7, 2012.  And so here we are…

 

Share

MERS Tells Schneiderman His Lawsuit Is Garbage

Steve Dibert, MFI-Miami

Below is a press release issued by MERS in response to the lawsuit filed by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman last week naming MERS as a co-defendant for defrauding the people of the state of New York.  Naturally, like every other press release MERS publishes you have to take it with a grain of salt because their press releases tend to be as accurate and unbiased as Leni Riefenstahl’s pro-Nazi “documentary”, Triumph of the Will from 1934.

Setting the Record Straight

Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) takes its role as a mortgagee very seriously. The MERS® System is an important part of the mortgage industry and the MERS business model has been consistently validated in all 50 states. All of the activities of MERSCORP and MERS are in compliance with state and federal laws. We are confident that as people understand more about MERS and the role we play, they will see that MERS adds great value to our nation’s system of housing finance in ways that benefit not just financial institutions, the broader economy and the government, but—most of all—homeowners.

AG Schneiderman Claim #1: Defendants have improperly brought New York foreclosure proceedings in MERS’ Name

FACT: The right to bring a foreclosure action is determined by the Plaintiff’s relationship to the mortgage loan, which is whether the entity bringing the action is the holder of the note or authorized by the holder of the note to bring a foreclosure action. MERS was authorized by the note holder to bring foreclosure actions in its name, and the borrower agreed that MERS may be the entity who may foreclose on the property in the event of a default. That being said, since July 2011 MERS no longer acts as foreclosing entity. In addition, MERSCORP never received a fee or made any money on foreclosures initiated in MERS’ name.

AG Schneiderman Claim #2: MERS Certifying Officers, including defendant servicers’ employees and agents, have submitted false, deceptive and often legally invalid documents in New York foreclosure proceedings

FACT: When MERS is the mortgagee and is not the entity foreclosing, MERS executes an assignment of a mortgage that transfers all of the interests in the mortgage to the entity that is foreclosing prior to the commencement of the foreclosure. The courts have held that MERS may assign its interests, as a mortgagee, and that such assignments are valid.

AG Schneiderman Claim #3: The use of MERS certifying officers by defendants has confused and deceived homeowners and the courts.

FACT: It is perfectly proper for MERS, as the mortgagee, in order to fulfill certain acts required of the mortgagee, to appoint signing officers (or agents) to act on MERS’ behalf. To act as a principal for its signing officers is not a deceptive trade practice. There is no requirement under New York law that a principal must disclose whether its agents are employed by another entity. These agents authorized to act on behalf of MERS are not employees of MERS, but employees of the loan servicers or sub-servicing companies. Signing officers are duly authorized to perform their responsibilities on behalf of MERS who is the mortgagee – in compliance with applicable laws – and to sign their own names and to use the titles “vice president” and “assistant secretary” of MERS.

AG Schneiderman Claim #4: MERS and defendant servicers through their use of MERS have concealed important information from homeowners about their property and the role that MERS plays with respect to their mortgage.

FACT: MERS does not hide ownership or undermine the integrity of land records. Any mortgage holder registered in the MERS® System can easily access information related to their mortgage on our website or through a toll-free number. Federal law provides that consumers are notified for changes in investors or servicing status. In addition, county land records were not intended to identify the servicer of a mortgage or the current note holder; they are intended to provide notice to purchasers of property that there is a lien on the property and when that lien was perfected.

Share