Mold In Foreclosed Homes Putting Others At Risk

WINK – Ft Myers Beach, FL

A new foreclosure crisis: damage left behind putting other homes at risk of foreclosure, too.

Jan Swanson thought she’d live in her home the rest of her life. But a few weeks ago, she discovered something unsettling: a bad smell.

When her neighbor walked away from his condo unit, somehow, water leaked out saturating everything and leaving behind evasive mold.

“So this is what’s right next door to me,” Jan told Call for Action as she pointed out the mold growing in the home next to her.

That same wall where the mold is growing is shared by her unit.

Jan told WINK NEWS she worries,

“It will eat up this townhouse since I have the greatest connection with the townhouse behind me that flooded, mine is going to be the first one to go.”

Once the mold enters her home, Jan says she’ll have no choice, but to walk. “It’s kind of an overwhelming loss,” said Jan, “With the economy I’m really not working. I haven’t had a full time job since July and now I’m looking at losing my property and it’s depressing.”It’s hard for code enforcement to hold anyone responsible.

Read more: http://www.winknews.com/Call-for-Action/2010-06-01/Foreclosed-homes-putting-others-at-risk#ixzz0pz1mFkGT

Share

How Bank of America’s Mortgage Write-Down Program Works

By Nick Timiraos, Wall Street Journal

Don’t call us, we’ll call you—that was the message on Wednesday from Bank of America executives who announced the bank’s new effort to modify mortgages by cutting loan balances.

Under the program, Bank of America will reduce certain loans by up to 30% in order to lower monthly payments for borrowers facing foreclosure. While banks have selectively used principal write-downs to modify loans that they own, Bank of America’s approach could represent the beginning of broader efforts by banks to add write-downs as a more common tool in their loan-modification arsenal.

Here’s how it works: only borrowers who had loans from Countrywide Financial, which Bank of America acquired in mid-2008, will be eligible. And only the riskiest loans will qualify: subprime loans, “option adjustable-rate” mortgages that have low initial monthly payments but that can adjust sharply higher, and certain prime loans that have a fixed interest rate for the first two years before starting to adjust annually.

The program is also limited to customers who have missed at least two consecutive payments, who can demonstrate that a financial hardship prevents them from making payments at the current level, and whose loan balance is at least 120% of the estimated home value.

Bank of America will go through its loan book to see which loans might qualify for reductions (while checking property values to see which ones are far enough under water), and then the bank will reach out to those who may be eligible. “Our customers do not need to take any actions at this time,” said Jack Schakett, a credit-loss mitigation executive.

Why all the qualification restrictions? For starters, banks and policy makers have long worried that they could up end the housing market if they offer principal write-downs too widely. Borrowers who are current but who owe more than their homes are worth, known as being “under water,” might stop paying to get a better deal. So it makes sense to start with a narrow pool of borrowers, particularly one that already has sky-high default rates.

Another reason: Bank of America is offering these modifications as part of a settlement reached Wednesday with the commonwealth of Massachusetts. The settlement is fairly detailed in prescribing what kinds of modifications Bank of America has to take with its Countrywide loans. (In an interview, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley said she pushed for principal reductions in the settlement because she didn’t want any bank to be “modifying a loan for the sake of modifying it, and finding two months, or six months, or a year later that it’s still going to be foreclosed on without getting to the root of the problem.”)

http://blogs.wsj.com/developments/2010/03/24/how-bank-of-americas-mortgage-write-down-program-works/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed

Share

Mass AG Pressures BofA To Do Principal Reductions On Mortgages Up To 30%

By JAMES R. HAGERTY And NICK TIMIRAOS, Wall Street Journal

Under pressure by Massachusetts prosecutors, Bank of America Corp. said Wednesday it would reduce mortgage-loan balances as much as 30% for thousands of troubled borrowers, in what could presage a wider government effort to encourage banks to offer debt reduction to ease the mortgage crisis.

The plan is one of the boldest moves yet to address the plight of millions of U.S. homeowners who are “under water,” owing more on their homes than they’re worth. It could make it easier for the Obama administration to move in a similar direction with its existing loan-modification program, although senior government officials and many bankers remain very wary of offering to cut loan balances as the main way of helping distressed borrowers.

So far, most modifications, including those under the government-subsidized Home Affordable Modification Program, involve reducing interest rates. Some also extend terms to 40 years, to shrink monthly payments.

But banks are finding that some borrowers aren’t willing to keep making even reduced payments, believing they have little hope of ever having equity in their homes and might be better off renting, and perhaps buying a less-expensive home later.

“Severely under-water homeowners are reluctant to accept a solution that does not offer some reduction in principal,” said Barbara Desoer, president of Bank of America Home Loans. “The whole purpose of the program is to get more customers to return phone calls” and make payments for trial modifications so workouts can be made permanent, she added.

Howard Glaser, a housing-industry consultant, said, “The fact that private institutions are moving in this direction makes it more palatable for the Obama administration to face criticism from homeowners who think there’s unfairness” in reducing principal for only some people.

Read more here: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703312504575141763259183050.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEFTWhatsNews

Share

Program Will Pay Homeowners to Sell at a Loss

David Streitfeld, NY Times

In an effort to end the foreclosure crisis, the Obama administration has been trying to keep defaulting owners in their homes. Now it will take a new approach: paying some of them to leave.

This latest program, which will allow owners to sell for less than they owe and will give them a little cash to speed them on their way, is one of the administration’s most aggressive attempts to grapple with a problem that has defied solutions.

More than five million households are behind on their mortgages and risk foreclosure. The government’s $75 billion mortgage modification plan has helped only a small slice of them. Consumer advocates, economists and even some banking industry representatives say much more needs to be done.

For the administration, there is also the concern that millions of foreclosures could delay or even reverse the economy’s tentative recovery — the last thing it wants in an election year.

Taking effect on April 5, the program could encourage hundreds of thousands of delinquent borrowers who have not been rescued by the loan modification program to shed their houses through a process known as a short sale, in which property is sold for less than the balance of the mortgage. Lenders will be compelled to accept that arrangement, forgiving the difference between the market price of the property and what they are owed.

“We want to streamline and standardize the short sale process to make it much easier on the borrower and much easier on the lender,” said Seth Wheeler, a Treasury senior adviser.

The problem is highlighted by a routine case in Phoenix. Chris Paul, a real estate agent, has a house he is trying to sell on behalf of its owner, who owes $150,000. Mr. Paul has an offer for $48,000, but the bank holding the mortgage says it wants at least $90,000. The frustrated owner is now contemplating foreclosure.

Read more here:  http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/08/business/08short.html?src=sch&pagewanted=all

Share