Romney says banking reform hurting housing market in Florida

Adam C. Smith, Tampa Bay times

Mitt RomneyMore than four in 10 Florida homeowners are underwater on their mortgages. President Barack Obamahas not done much to help them, and it doesn’t sound like Mitt Romney has any serious plan in store either. His main idea? Repeal Wall Street reform.

“Bankers have been very slow in renegotiating the mortgages, helping people go through the process, short sales and so forth that allow these products, these homes, to be taken out of the market so they can be bought by new investors,” Romney said in a Political Connections interview airing today on Bay News 9.

“Government has made it harder for the banks to do it. The Dodd-Frank (Wall Street) legislation has scared particularly community banks in such a way that they’re just paralyzed. They’re not taking action to help people get their mortgages renegotiated and let people either stay in their home or have the home ultimately go back in the hands of new investors that will turn it around and ultimately bring home values back up.”

Check out the full interview at 11 a.m. and 8 p.m. on Bay News 9.

Read more here

Share

Homeowner Activists Will Be Crushed Under Their Own Weight

Richard Zombeck, Huffington Post

Homeowner activists will be crushed under the sheer weight of their gigantic egos; 11 million blogs, websites, and Facebook pages; intellectual dishonesty; Internet turf wars; and a stranglehold on information — leaving homeowners sifting through debris for decades.

Since 2009, which by most people’s naive assessment is when the housing crisis and foreclosure fiasco began, the Internet has become littered with self-proclaimed mortgage experts and homeowner activists doing little more than drawing attention to themselves and pointing to their manufactured biographies and made up resumes. A vast majority of these bloggers do little to help homeowners and, in many cases, are doing irreparable harm with histrionics, inane screeching, disparate calls to action, and ignorant advice for struggling and desperate homeowners.

Every once in a while someone will pop up in the news or on a blog to take personal credit for having exposed “robo-signing” or for having coined the term “mortgage servicing fraud.” The media has been all too accommodating and eager to present these clowns as “citizen heroes” without a shred of research into their backgrounds, expertise, or credibility. As a result, these re-branded former traders, mortgage brokers, and, in some cases, convicted felons are allowed to pass themselves off as concerned citizens. In actuality, much of the mortgage mess was being discussed long before what many consider ground zero – as early as 2005 in some cases. (See: ML-Implode,MSFraud, and GetDShirtz.)

In an era of technology that promotes the sharing of information at lightning speed, the lack of unity and collaboration among bloggers is staggering and an affront to logic. Informing, educating, and helping homeowners has taken a back seat to turf wars over Internet traffic and self-adulation. Many of these site owners and bloggers seem less concerned with providing actual relief to homeowners than they are with boosting their ratings and agenda. One has to wonder if their newly found purpose in life could be jeopardized should an actual solution become miraculously available.

“It is frustrating and difficult to watch as the people who have risen to the forefront of this movement battle each other for turf in the marketplace of ideas,” says Vermont Trotter ofprotectamericasdream.com. “All this does is sow confusion into the network, leaving the homeowner confused and his efforts dispersed and unfocused. ‘Collaborate or Die’ isn’t just a slogan; it is the reality we are facing. The other side collaborates; we know that. It’s time we did too.”

In the meantime, a large majority of bloggers litter their sites with irrelevant articles and wild speculative theories, and plaster public documents with their personal watermark as if to expect a finder’s fee. Some promise do-it-yourself solutions from someone who may have attended a weekend seminar and published a PDF. Millions more simply repost random crap, violate copyright laws, and slap ads in every corner of their site’ hoping to get rich one nickel at a time.

“Many of these activists think that because they went to a 5-hour foreclosure seminar, that somehow makes them an attorney or mortgage expert who is qualified to give legal advice,” says Steve Dibert, of MFI-Miami, “This is like saying that anyone who watched Speed Racer cartoons in the 1970s would qualify for pole position at the Indianapolis 500. Not only do activists promote incorrect and discredited information, but it could be considered unlicensed practice of law.”

The worst offenders are the owners and authors of well-trafficked sites whose egos have grown with the number of readers. They moderate comments and forum posts in the same way Fox News edits its commentators.

While comments and forums can go off the rails and devolve into inane and irrelevant discussions without moderation, for the most part they add value to the discussion and the flow of information. Readers and bonified experts may question a theory, correct factual inaccuracies, challenge the author’s motivation, or even add to the author’s article by providing additional insight and information. Unfortunately, it’s usually the site owner moderating the comments and posts who prefers praise for their prose over intelligent discussion and, as a result, many of these comments, particularly ones that may actually add to the value of the article, don’t see the light of day. It’s as if the author’s feelings were hurt for not having come up with the idea himself. In the end, the reader is left with a soapbox speech of half-truths and misleading information followed by applause and comments from adoring fans who are no less ignorant than the author.

Martin Andelman of Mandelman Matters and a Home Preservation Network contributor is one of the more consistent and outspoken bloggers on this issue. He and I share a common sentiment with several others: get this done and put it behind us. Neither of us planned on getting attention this way. Being insulted and lambasted by other activists supposedly on the same side is not what you shoot for when you’re making a five year plan.

“I never delete comments unless they’re racially motivated or hateful,” Andelman says., “I have readers on my site that are a lot smarter than me and when I write something it’s to get people talking. I want people to think about what I wrote and point out something I missed. I don’t do this to be ‘right’.”

Last year Van Jones was quoted as saying, “You move from anger to answers. You move from pointing out the problem to pointing out the solutions.” An inspiring sentiment, but with no follow-through is meaningless. I’ve spoken to several activists and well established bloggers over the past year who have reached out to Jones (myself included) to no avail — it seems everyone really does want to do this on their own — or at the very least taken direction from President Obama on the lack of follow through when it comes to this issue.

In Iceland, people hurled rocks at Parliament and were rewarded with a nationwide reduction in mortgage principal. In Spain, hookers collectively refused to service bankers until they loosened lending standards. The Greeks started their own barter system, bypassing the banks. In Cairo, tens of thousands of Egyptians gathered in one place at the same time to protest their outrage, making OWS look like a campus sit-in. In France, if you threaten to take away a federal holiday, people set fire to cars and hurl mailboxes through plate glass windows. In fact, International Monetary Fund Chief, Christine Lagarde had more to say about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac than any of our elected U.S. officials combined, but the best this country can come up with is eleven million blogs of re-posted crap?

This country has some very bright, motivated, innovative, and passionate people. If they started working together rather than hoping for the number one slot on American Idol, something might get done.

Without collaboration on all fronts this movement, like any movement, will collapse under its own weight. The divisiveness, infighting, and turf wars have made it easy for the ones who created this mess to run roughshod over the American people and the laws that were meant to protect them.

The “cause”, as it were, is severely disjointed and incomprehensibly divided by many wanting the same thing — relief for homeowners and justice for those who were harmed.

As Vermont Trotter, a colleague and contributor to HPN, says all too frequently, “Do what you do, but do it together.”

Author’s Note: This blog post was, in fact, a collaborative effort. As with many pieces I’ve written, I rely on others who know more than me for guidance, advice, and facts. Thanks go out to all of them who contributed to this piece in one way or another:

While comments and forums can go off the rails and devolve into inane and irrelevant discussions without moderation, for the most part they add value to the discussion and the flow of information. Readers and bonified experts may question a theory, correct factual inaccuracies, challenge the author’s motivation, or even add to the author’s article by providing additional insight and information. Unfortunately, it’s usually the site owner moderating the comments and posts who prefers praise for their prose over intelligent discussion and, as a result, many of these comments, particularly ones that may actually add to the value of the article, don’t see the light of day. It’s as if the author’s feelings were hurt for not having come up with the idea himself. In the end, the reader is left with a soapbox speech of half-truths and misleading information followed by applause and comments from adoring fans who are no less ignorant than the author.

Martin Andelman of Mandelman Matters and a Home Preservation Network contributor is one of the more consistent and outspoken bloggers on this issue. He and I share a common sentiment with several others: get this done and put it behind us. Neither of us planned on getting attention this way. Being insulted and lambasted by other activists supposedly on the same side is not what you shoot for when you’re making a five year plan.

“I never delete comments unless they’re racially motivated or hateful,” Andelman says., “I have readers on my site that are a lot smarter than me and when I write something it’s to get people talking. I want people to think about what I wrote and point out something I missed. I don’t do this to be ‘right’.”

Last year Van Jones was quoted as saying, “You move from anger to answers. You move from pointing out the problem to pointing out the solutions.” An inspiring sentiment, but with no follow-through is meaningless. I’ve spoken to several activists and well established bloggers over the past year who have reached out to Jones (myself included) to no avail — it seems everyone really does want to do this on their own — or at the very least taken direction from President Obama on the lack of follow through when it comes to this issue.

In Iceland, people hurled rocks at Parliament and were rewarded with a nationwide reduction in mortgage principal. In Spain, hookers collectively refused to service bankers until they loosened lending standards. The Greeks started their own barter system, bypassing the banks. In Cairo, tens of thousands of Egyptians gathered in one place at the same time to protest their outrage, making OWS look like a campus sit-in. In France, if you threaten to take away a federal holiday, people set fire to cars and hurl mailboxes through plate glass windows. In fact, International Monetary Fund Chief, Christine Lagarde had more to say about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac than any of our elected U.S. officials combined, but the best this country can come up with is eleven million blogs of re-posted crap?

This country has some very bright, motivated, innovative, and passionate people. If they started working together rather than hoping for the number one slot on American Idol, something might get done.

Without collaboration on all fronts this movement, like any movement, will collapse under its own weight. The divisiveness, infighting, and turf wars have made it easy for the ones who created this mess to run roughshod over the American people and the laws that were meant to protect them.

The “cause”, as it were, is severely disjointed and incomprehensibly divided by many wanting the same thing — relief for homeowners and justice for those who were harmed.

As Vermont Trotter, a colleague and contributor to HPN, says all too frequently, “Do what you do, but do it together.”

Author’s Note: This blog post was, in fact, a collaborative effort. As with many pieces I’ve written, I rely on others who know more than me for guidance, advice, and facts. Thanks go out to all of them who contributed to this piece in one way or another:

  • Martin Andelman, Mandelman Matters
  • Matt Weidner, mattweidnerlaw.com
  • Nancie Koerber, Project Reconomy
  • Jack Wright, MS-Fraud
  • Vermont Trotter, Protect America’s Dream
  • Mike Dillon, Stellionata Consulting
  • Steve Dibert, MFI-Miami
  • Pamela Joye, Pamela Joye Photography

Follow Richard Zombeck on Twitter: www.twitter.com/zombeck

Share

Angry Over The Lack Of Banker Convictions? Blame OJ Simpson

Steve Dibert, MFI-Miami

Since I started MFI-Miami, I have heard from thousands of people who are appalled by the fact that no one has been convicted in the financial crisis for mortgage servicing fraud, robo-signing, filing false documents, foreclosure fraud, etc.  However, contrary to what the loony mortgage activists and armchair foreclosure experts will tell you it’s not because of some mass conspiracy with the banks, the government or even the Illuminati.

It’s about money and how much it would cost the various government agencies to convict nearly 100 billionaires.  After all, justice is not free and someone has to pick up the tab.  The federal government and the states, like homeowners who are in foreclosure, have to make the tough call about rolling the dice.  Do they spend tens of millions of dollars fighting for the convictions of billionaire bankers and run the risk of being publicly humiliated or do they go after the one homeowner with no money who overstated his income on his mortgage application?  Prosecutors weigh the monetary cost  to the taxpayers for a conviction against the likelihood of a conviction.  I call this the OJ Simpson Litmus Test.

The OJ Simpson Litmus Test

OJ Simpson Bankster convictionsMost people don’t know that while OJ Simpson was on trial for murdering his wife and Ron Goldman back in the mid 1990s, there was another trial going on in the courtroom next door.  Like OJ Simpson, a black man was accused of murdering two people.   The difference was, this black man had a public defender for a lawyer while OJ Simpson had a multi-million dollar legal dream team assembled by Kim Kardashian’s late father, Robert Shapiro (who now pawns his website for legal forms on TV) and famed criminal defense attorney, F. Lee Bailey (who has since been disbarred in two states).

OJ Simpson was acquitted and until his conviction for criminal conspiracy,kidnapping, assault, robbery, and using a deadly weapon in 2008, spent the next 13 years drinking mojitos, playing golf and picking up bar hoes in Florida while the guy in the courtroom next door went to San Quentin and everyday clutches a bar of soap in the shower as if his life depends on it.

The Simpson acquittal was an embarrassment for a lot of people and almost cost former LA District Attorney, Gil Garcetti his re-election in 1996.  One of the main reasons the prosecution lost was due to his legal team being outsmarted and outmatched at every turn by Johnnie Cochran and Bailey.

What most people don’t understand about the legal profession is that there are two types of attorneys that go work at a prosecutor’s office.  The smart and ambitious ones go there to gain trial experience where the rest go there because their performance in law school didn’t attract the attention of any high power law firms.  The smart ambitious attorneys tend to leave and form their one firms after about ten years and use their experience to become skilled litigators demanding top dollar.

Wall Street lawyers tend to have excelled in Ivy League law school and got noticed by the big law firms representing the major players in finance or the law firms hire the aforementioned prosecutors.

The finance industry takes the same attitude I do when it comes to good attorneys and that is, I can’t have enough of them.  Like the finance industry, I am willing to pay top dollar and train good lawyers in the intricacies of mortgage finance to get the results I think my clients are entitled to.  The only difference is financial companies have hundreds of millions of dollars at their disposal to train these attorneys.

Because of this, state or federal prosecutors fear a criminal case against the banks would be the OJ Simpson murder trial on steroids.  Prosecutors would be outmatched and smarted by attorneys who have two things prosecutors don’t have, the ability to simplify complex financial practices to a jury of twelve people and clients willing to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to cast reasonable doubt.  After all, a criminal case is not about guilt or innocence, it’s about proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

OJ Simpson started a trend by the wealthy in this country of spending whatever it cost to produce that reasonable doubt.  So next time you want to bitch to your congressman or to a member of your state legislature because they lack the testicular fortitude to demand justice,  send a  letter to OJ Simpson instead.  Here’s his address:

OJ Simpson C/O

Lovelack Correctional Center

1200 Prison Rd,

Lovelack, NV 89419

 

Share

U.S. adds muscle to financial fraud investigations

Aruna Viswanatha, Reuters

An Obama administration task force probing misconduct that fueled the financial crisis is increasing its ranks, adding five financial analysts and 10 new federal prosecutors spread across the country, according to a senior Justice Department official.

The increased staffing reflects a new push by the administration to aggressively pursue cases against firms and individuals who contributed to the 2007-2009 financial crisis, especially ahead of the November election.

The U.S. Justice Department has so far brought few cases against high-profile targets since the crash.

The department closed criminal investigations without bringing charges against firms whose names are closely tied to the 2008 crash, including AIG and Countrywide.

Individual Wall Street players have largely escaped prosecution, after the Justice Department lost its first criminal case against two former Bear Stearns hedge fund managers in 2009.

U.S. enforcement authorities have asked for patience, saying financial crisis cases are complex and though the behavior may look bad, it doesn’t always amount to outright fraud.

Read more here

Share