Schneiderman Sues Major Banks Over Alleged MERS Fraud

Loren Berlin, Huffington Post

NY AG Eric SchneidermanThree big banks were hit on Friday with yet another lawsuit related to wrongful foreclosures. Democratic New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman filed suit against Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase and Wells Fargo for deceptive and fraudulent use of a private database used to register mortgages, according to a Friday press release from his office.

Schneiderman has been outspoken in urging the Obama administration to hold the nation’s largest financial institutions accountable for their role in the foreclosure crisis, notably hesitating to join a larger nationwide case against the country’s five largest banks for mortgage fraud. States now have until Monday, according to the Iowa attorney general’s office, to decide to join that deal.

The New York attorney general has yet to announce whether New York will participate in the deal because of concerns that joining the settlement would make it impossible for him to file his own, state-based lawsuits against the banks, said sources close to the negotiations who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The decision to bring this lawsuit on Friday indicates that the larger nationwide settlement is now more to Schneiderman’s pleasing, said a source familiar with the discussions.

“If the deal terms had been decided six months ago, a state couldn’t have pursued this kind of lawsuit,” said the source. “The fact that Schneiderman has filed this case suggests that the terms of the deal have changed since then.”

Last week Schneiderman was named one of five co-chairs of a new task force announced by President Barack Obama to investigate fraud related to bonds backed by mortgage loans.

The Friday suit positions Schneiderman to go after another piece of the mortgage securitization system that’s been blamed for foreclosure fraud: the system that banks use to facilitate the creation of mortgage backed securities. Banks use the Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, or MERS, to register mortgage loan ownership. Before the creation of the system in 1995, registration took place at local courthouses, slowing down the process of bundling individual mortgages into securities. More than 70 million mortgages have been registered with MERS, according to a press release from Schneiderman’s office.

The Friday lawsuit claims that the system led to fraudulent foreclosures, undermined the state’s process for reviewing foreclosure cases and made it difficult for homeowners to access mortgage-related documents, said Schneiderman in the press statement.

Read more here

Share

Unrecorded Paid Mortgages Popping Up On Title Work Like A Herpes Outbreak

Foreclosure From Old Mortgages ‘Most Egregious Manifestation’ Of Broken Housing Market

Michelle Conlin, Reuters

ForeclosuresIn July 2009, Roy and Sheila Bowers refinanced the mortgage on their suburban ranch home in Topeka, Kansas. The couple wanted to take advantage of the low interest rates that were all the rage at the time.

Roy, a truck driver, and Sheila, a former hotel housekeeping supervisor, knew their new loan from Wells Fargo would enable them to save $198.86 a month – a nice chunk to help with gas and groceries.

But what the Bowers never imagined was that their old loan, the one Wells Fargo told them was paid off, would resurrect itself, trashing their credit report, scotching their son’s student loans and throwing the whole family into foreclosure. All, they say, even though they didn’t miss a single mortgage payment.

The Bowers aren’t alone.

More and more, homeowners say that mortgages they thought were dead and buried are springing back to life, sometimes haunting them all the way into foreclosure.

“It’s the most egregious manifestation of an industry that’s seriously broken,” said Ira Rheingold, a lawyer who is the executive director of the National Association of Consumer Advocate.

Diane Thompson, an attorney with the National Consumer Law Center, says she has defended hundreds of foreclosure cases, and in nearly all of them, the homeowner was not in default. “The record-keeping on the part of the mortgage servicers is not to be trusted.”

The problems grew from a lot of sloppy recordkeeping that began during the housing boom, when Wall Street built a quick-and-dirty back-office operation to process mortgages quickly so lenders could sell as many loans as possible. As the loans were later sold to investors, and then resold around the world, the back office system sidestepped crucial legal procedures.

Now it’s becoming clear just how dysfunctional and, according to several state attorneys general, how fraudulent the whole system was.

Depositions from “affidavit slaves” depict a surreal, assembly-line world in which the banks and their partner firms hired hair stylists, fast-food kids and Wal-Mart floor workers, paying them $10 a day, to pose as bank vice presidents, assistant secretaries and corporate attorneys.

These “robosigners” became a national sensation in the fall of 2010 when it was revealed that they faked titles, forged documents and backdated affidavits so they could make up for the bypassed procedures and foreclose on properties.

They passed around notary stamps as if they were salt. They did all of this, they testified, without verifying a single word in any of the documents – as is required by law.

Read more here

Share

Wells Fargo agrees to pay restitution to mortgage borrowers

Consumer Protection Division alleges deceptive marketing of loans

Lorraine Mirabella, The Baltimore Sun

Wells Fargo reaches deal on Option-ARMsUnder an agreement announced Thursday by the Maryland Attorney General’s Office, Wells Fargo has agreed to make loan modifications and pay nearly $1 million in restitution to customers of two lenders acquired by the bank.

The office’s Consumer Protection Division, which reached the agreement with Wells Fargo, said lenders Wachovia and Golden West Financial used deceptive marketing in offering consumers adjustable-rate home loans.

Wells Fargo will pay $940,056 to borrowers with “Pick-a-Payment” mortgages written by Wachovia and Golden West who lost their homes in foreclosure, the agreement says. Wells Fargo acquired the two lenders in 2008.

So far about 250 borrowers in Maryland with “Pick-a-Payment” mortgages are known to have lost their homes to foreclosure, but that number could grow, said David Paulson, a spokesman for the Attorney General’s Office.

In addition to the agreement in Maryland, Wells Fargo has signed similar pacts with attorneys general in 11 states.

“Wells Fargo is further helping at-risk Wachovia ‘Pick-a-Payment’ customers who may be eligible to earn principal forgiveness by making on-time mortgage payments,” said Tom Goyda, a vice president and spokesman for Wells Fargo Home Mortgage.

The agreement says Wachovia and Golden West offered borrowers a choice of several types of mortgages, including 30-year fixed-rate loans.

Read more here

Share

Sloppy seconds: Feds Probe $150 Million Double Billing Scheme By Banks

Catherine Curan, NY Post

John Stumpf, CEO of Wells Fargo and others may start feeling the heat from the feds for double billing homeowners

Federal investigators are looking into allegations that banks have wrongly pocketed tens of millions of dollars from troubled homeowners by double-billing for mortgage escrow fees, The Post has learned.

Exactly how much in phony profits the banks may have pocketed from this alleged practice is not known, but an analysis by The Post of bankruptcy cases in 2011 shows it could range higher than $150 million for just the new cases filed this year.

The problem has gotten so out of hand that lawyers and accountants at the New York City office of US Trustee — charged with protecting the integrity of US bankruptcy courts — are poring over local Chapter 13 bankruptcy cases for evidence of wrongdoing.

The federal investigators were tipped to the alleged practice by metro area bankruptcy lawyers. Cases specifically involved Wells Fargo and GMAC Mortgage, but lawyers say most banks had double-dipped.

“It seems prevalent, and it’s a moneymaking machine,” David Shaev, a Manhattan bankruptcy defense lawyer, said of the banks’ double-dipping.

Westchester bankruptcy defense lawyer Linda Tirelli says 75 percent of her clients face escrow double-billing by their lender or mortgage servicer, for amounts up to $2,800.

Here’s how the double-dipping scam can be pulled off.

Many homeowners opt to pay part of their property taxes and homeowners insurance with their mortgage every month. The funds are then put into an escrow account and used to periodically pay the taxes and insurance.
Read more here:

 

Share